Well, the trio of "The Gloria Scott", "The Musgrave Ritual" and "A Study in Scarlet" come pretty close...Heck, Arthur Conan Doyle never wrote "Sherlock Holmes Begins."![]()
Although we had to wait for Chris Columbus and Barry Levinson to give us Young Sherlock Holmes. (Which, of course, is out of continuity because it has Holmes and Watson meeting before ASIS.)
I don't doubt that there have been badass women in every time, but how many of them have been upper-crust Brits like Carter?
That's the point -- since they've been overlooked by history, we can't know for sure how many there were. But every bell curve has its outliers, so I'd say there's a reasonable chance that the number is above zero.
After all, how many WWII American soldiers were skinny nobodies turned into supersoldiers by Vita-Rays (TM)? Adventure fiction rarely focuses on typical individuals.
Anyhow, moving on, I don't mean to demand an origin story for her or anything, but I do stand by my point that we still know next to nothing about her as a character, and that she could therefore use some more depth next season, much as May and Skye have gotten.
Sure -- definitely there's room for deepening her and the other characters. But I resist the idea that she needs to have her skills explained and justified, as if she were some kind of anomaly. The point of the show is that there's no reason why she shouldn't be able to function on the same level as her male colleagues, if not more so because of her years working with the elite Howling Commandos to battle Hydra. It's not like women have undergone some fundamental evolutionary change in the past 80 years. Women like Peggy have always been around; they just haven't always gotten the credit that an equally capable man would've gotten. That's what the show dramatizes. So I feel that if the show turned around and started acting like it had to justify how a woman like Peggy could exist in that era, it would undermine the message of the series.