• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Baggage you wish Star Trek could be free of?

In any case, you have to appeal to the masses to make the show successful. Networks will simply not continue to air a show with low ratings in this day in age. If Star Trek only caters to the diehards then Star Trek will die.
 
What I'd like to be rid of: The idea that Star Trek is somehow above the 'unwashed masses.'

Can't the people who trot out that line remember a time where they were only just introduced to Trek? Everyone had a period where they didn't care less about Trek, and everyone had their jumping off point that hooked them. Trek was not born with a fanbase. If the series aimed to cater purely to fans from the get-go, there would be a lot less people posting here today.

We also need to get over the idea that this reaction is somehow 'new' for the latest films. I remember a bunch of adults sneering at 12-year-old me on IMDB, purely because I said NEM was the only Trek movie I'd seen at the time. 'Not a true fan! Not real Star Trek! Just a passing fad! Blah blah blah.'

Kor said

No, according to TOS, Kirk was considered "a stack of books with legs" at the Academy. In his class, "you either think or sink."

He was also 'never a Boy Scout.' Pick your backstory, or meld them together to make your own!
 
Last edited:
NASA also doesn't have ranks like Admiral, it doesn't have uniforms, aside from spacesuits, it doesn't make subordinates call their superiors "sir", they don't have insignia on their clothes to denote their position, if you disobey an order you'll probably just get fired, you won't get thrown in the brig or brought up on charges and court martialed. NASA doesn't have an academy with cadets, people who work for NASA don't stand watch or have to be the officer of the deck. There isn't a "special forces" division, they don't put the prefix USS in front of their craft, they don't operate from "bases".......and so on and so on. Guess which kinds of organizations have all these things and many more that star fleet features????
Police forces generally have all of this.


The coast guard which is directly the best example have alot of this as well.

Ignoring the fact that nasa is bound to develop a military structure that is easier to reconginize as the scale of missions expands. Typical ranks, or even an academy make no sense until we have a largest number of astronaunts in space.



Starfleet is a mix of exploration, humanitarian, pure science, diplomatic, law enforcement and military.

At no point are any of these traits seen to be secondary.

That's ignoring a larger ark where starfleet seems to take the place of organized labor(unions).
 
What Star Trek 'baggage' would I lose?

Selective Star Trek fans who declare that one series, or set of movies is the 'real' Star Trek, and disparage fans who like another series or set of movies. Get over yourself.

Vulcans, Ferengi and Romulans, . They're just over-used ,and I hate big, fake rubber ears.

Enterprise destruction. - Come on, they lose the Enterprise more often than my younger brother gets his car repossessed.

Time Travel. I think other comments have accurately described how I feel. Time to ditch this plot convenience device.

The Enterprise destruction thing is dead on. When they did it in TSFS is was shocking and original. Then the A and B were both destroyed non canon the C and D bought it canon and I don't know about the E but they tried to destroy it in FC.....it's the unluckiest name in the fleet.

Since I don't read the novels, I must have missed the destructions of the A and B.

I think some people here aren't fully understanding what "baggage" means. I've read a lot of comments about specific aliens, items or events that people would drop if they were retconning or rebooting Trek. This seems like not seeing the forest for the trees.

From my point of view, baggage is something big and large that Trek has been carrying around for quite some time. Baggage is something that can be dropped without rebooting Trek. I'm talking big, sweeping concepts or tropes that people think must be in Star Trek.

Technobabble was a good example someone through out a few pages ago. Time travel. Overly white/European/North American culture and characters. Overused aliens such as the Borg. Those are all good examples of baggage that have made Trek stale.

Rebooting is different than getting rid of baggage. We could have a brand new Star Trek series set in the Prime Universe that pays attention and doesn't retcon the past Treks and still lose a lot of baggage.
Spot on very much agree with this as the OP.
 
Kor said

No, according to TOS, Kirk was considered "a stack of books with legs" at the Academy. In his class, "you either think or sink."

He was also 'never a Boy Scout.' Pick your backstory, or meld them together to make your own!
I think the stack of book with legs left with Vucanians and UESPA. ;)
 
Starfleet is a mix of exploration, humanitarian, pure science, diplomatic, law enforcement and military.

StarFleet is without a doubt a military force. All militaries throughout history have conducted exploration and humanitarian and diplomatic missions
 
Kor said

No, according to TOS, Kirk was considered "a stack of books with legs" at the Academy. In his class, "you either think or sink."

He was also 'never a Boy Scout.' Pick your backstory, or meld them together to make your own!
I think the stack of book with legs left with Vucanians and UESPA. ;)

Both could be equally accurate. Kirk can be a stack of books with legs while IN class, but "never a boy scout" when OUT of class.
 
Starfleet is a mix of exploration, humanitarian, pure science, diplomatic, law enforcement and military.

StarFleet is without a doubt a military force. All militaries throughout history have conducted exploration and humanitarian and diplomatic missions

I most definitely would not say all militaries do exploration/humanitarian/diplomatic missions (i.e. those militaries resulting from several dictatorships or violent coups over civilian rule), but your point is made.
 
I get tired of "fans" demanding what they want or don't want to see in Star Trek.

+ a whole bunch
And what do you two think this thread is about?

The coast guard which is directly the best example have alot of this as well.
The US Coast Guard is a branch of the US military.

That's ignoring a larger ark where starfleet seems to take the place of organized labor(unions).
Where please?

:)
 
For me:

Human Exceptionalism: This trope is something Star Trek beats us over the head with. Out of the hundreds of worlds in the UFP, somehow, its the Humans who lead it, and everyone wants to be human, act more human, or adopt human pop culture. Humans are new to the party, when it comes to space travel, hell, even being "enlightened." Yet somehow, humans are to be emulated by Vulcans, Andorians, etc. Every time the Enterprise encounters some super evolved energy being, that being needs to de-evolve, to be more human. I'd like to see humans want to emulate other cultures, for a change. When other cultures have been space faring for hundreds if not thousands of years, it should be the humans who are listening.

Religion: The idea that humans literally become secular over night isn't realistic. Religion is as old as humanity itself, yet somehow, it's shed by the 22nd or 23rd century, and the only religious people left are aliens? There should be Earth religions that are still prominent. I think it would be interesting to see how space travel and aliens affected Christianity, Islam, Judaism, and indigenous cultures across Earth.

Cultural homogeneity: Earth seems to have regions where countries used to be, but seems to be one unified culture. Where are the Asians and east Indians, which make up more than half the population of Earth? Also, alien cultures, like Vulcans, Romulans, and Klingons are too homogenous. Why can't there be subcultures within those cultures. The closest that came to that was the Vulcans of Enterprise.

Time Travel: An over used trope. Simply put, it should be nearly impossible to achieve, but by Voyager, it is established it becomes so common, they actually have a temporal police?
 
I most definitely would not say all militaries do exploration/humanitarian/diplomatic missions (i.e. those militaries resulting from several dictatorships or violent coups over civilian rule), but your point is made.

You are correct, not all, but many have.

Exploration: Lewis and Clark were military, most of the European explorers that sailed the oceans were military.

Diplomatic: Gen MacAuthor ruled Japan after WWII

Humanitarian: The largest humanitarian force in the world right now is the US military
 
Religion: The idea that humans literally become secular over night isn't realistic. Religion is as old as humanity itself, yet somehow, it's shed by the 22nd or 23rd century, and the only religious people left are aliens? There should be Earth religions that are still prominent. I think it would be interesting to see how space travel and aliens affected Christianity, Islam, Judaism, and indigenous cultures across Earth.

This I agree with. The only religious humans are ones who practice "Native" or "primitive" religion.
 
Religion: The idea that humans literally become secular over night isn't realistic. Religion is as old as humanity itself, yet somehow, it's shed by the 22nd or 23rd century, and the only religious people left are aliens? There should be Earth religions that are still prominent. I think it would be interesting to see how space travel and aliens affected Christianity, Islam, Judaism, and indigenous cultures across Earth.

TNG was the only Trek series that tried to say humans no longer practiced religion, and even they backtracked on that once Roddenberry was gone. Otherwise, we know human religion does exist well into the 24th century, DS9 indicated Christianity still exists, and we know from Voyager (and TNG, for that matter) that Native Americans still practice their spiritual beliefs. Even in TOS the Enterprise had a chapel on board and in Enterprise Phlox once talked about his fascination with religion and all the various religions he observed being practiced on Earth.

Now, it's true none of the main human characters in any of the series seem to be particularly religious, aside from Chakotay. But I guess that luck of the draw has placed atheists on the senior staffs of the Enterprises, DS9 and Voyager.
 
I get tired of "fans" demanding what they want or don't want to see in Star Trek.

+ a whole bunch
And what do you two think this thread is about?

The coast guard which is directly the best example have alot of this as well.
The US Coast Guard is a branch of the US military.

That's ignoring a larger ark where starfleet seems to take the place of organized labor(unions).
Where please?

:)
I apologize, in canada our coast guard is independent of hte military. Either way you get the idea.

Starfleet has alot of military based structure, however it clearly does things typical military do not do.
 
I don't mind the idea of holodecks, but they should work like they are confined in a small space and have well tested safety protocols.

Transporters I agree make escapes a lot less interesting but they are a big part of Trek aesthetic. I say keep the transporters but require a transporter fixture on both ends. No site to site transporting.

ESP is harmless if kept uncommon. Genetic engineering should have been addressed fully with all its implications and the Federation's enemies should have made better use of it.

I definitely agree, more variety of aliens, more variety of ethnic background among humans, more non-humanoid races. Though some of that is an unavoidable cost issue. I'd rather have human looking aliens than badly done prosthetics.
 
Starfleet has alot of military based structure, however it clearly does things typical military do not do.

The only difference between Starfleet and most modern militaries is that Starfleet has a larger science division. And that's more to do with them being in space than it is in indication of how military they are.

Besides, Starfleet has protocol which allow a starship captain the authority to annihilate all life on an inhabited planet. An ability like that would be given to the military before it was given to NASA or an organization similar to the Canadian Coast Guard (which doesn't even have firearms).
 
TNG was the only Trek series that tried to say humans no longer practiced religion, and even they backtracked on that once Roddenberry was gone. Otherwise, we know human religion does exist well into the 24th century, DS9 indicated Christianity still exists, and we know from Voyager (and TNG, for that matter) that Native Americans still practice their spiritual beliefs. Even in TOS the Enterprise had a chapel on board and in Enterprise Phlox once talked about his fascination with religion and all the various religions he observed being practiced on Earth.

I missed that -- what episode was that in?
 
Episodic story-telling.

I enjoy stories that are rich in continuity and played out over multiple episodes, I like serious consequences and abhor the big red reset button.

Another issue, though one much more rooted in the technical (and commercial) aspect of the franchise, is the human aliens; by which I mean the aliens that are, literally, just humans, with a vaguely defined one-note cultural quirk.

I enjoyed the "rubber-forehead aliens" in the sense that I prefer the idea that the races we meet are similar to us and, culture, rather than biology, is a much bigger source of conflict. So, that's not the problem, it's the over-abundance of aliens that have no distinguishing features whatsoever, that are the problem.

The only way I could imagine liking it is if, as with the Vulcans/Romulans/Mintakans, there were to be an implied recent genetic relationship between such aliens and humans (as in, that they're the result of lost human deep-space expeditions, breakaway colonies, or abducted populations from Earth).
 
I´d like to get rid of that kind of technobabble that is beyond of the average Trekkie (who is not an engineer or astrophysicist).

It´s difficult to make all the fancy gimmick comprehensible and technology is part of SciFi, but there is a limit.
 
TNG was the only Trek series that tried to say humans no longer practiced religion, and even they backtracked on that once Roddenberry was gone. Otherwise, we know human religion does exist well into the 24th century, DS9 indicated Christianity still exists, and we know from Voyager (and TNG, for that matter) that Native Americans still practice their spiritual beliefs. Even in TOS the Enterprise had a chapel on board and in Enterprise Phlox once talked about his fascination with religion and all the various religions he observed being practiced on Earth.

I missed that -- what episode was that in?

I forget exactly, it was one in the seventh season where Sisko and Kasidy Yates begin planning their wedding. Sisko asks if she's okay with Admiral Ross marrying them, and she says yes, despite her "Christian mother preferring a minister over a Starfleet admiral."
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top