Spider-Man: Clone SagaIf it is a total reboot, what would you call the 2017 movie?
*ducks*

Spider-Man: Clone SagaIf it is a total reboot, what would you call the 2017 movie?
Marvel has started shying away from straight-up origin films, so I don't think we have anything to worry about there.I hope they just use Spider-Man, I don't feel like going through the origin yet again.
They should do what they did in the 94 animated series, have the character be a little more heroic by trying to take down the Man-Spider.Maybe we can get a Spidey vs. Punisher movie now.
Ugh, no thanks. Punisher is a terrible character, violent and joyless. He's little more than a thug with a gun.
But, then you get the questions like "Where was Spider-Man during the battle of New York?"
"Why hadn't SHIELD tracked down Peter and put him on "The Index?"
"If the existence of the Hulk was public knowledge, then why did Pete have to work so hard to convince Captain Stacy that Conners' transformation was possible?"
Besides, as has been brought up before, Garfield was out anyway, Marvel deal or no.
The Wall Street Journal is reporting they heard from a source that Spidey will indeed appear in Civil War. Newsarama article. I know that was what most people have been assuming, but it's still nice to have unofficial confirmation.
^ Now way! The title should be Spectacular Spider-Man!
If they're going a "light reboot" / "implied continuity" direction, I think they'd be more likely to indirectly reference elements from the Raimi films, which more people saw and liked.
The point of various Spider-Man titles is to have new books in the stores every week rather than waiting an entire month.
Regarding this deal, is there anywhere where it says Peter will be used (or even the same actor will be used) in Marvel and Sony movies? Is it possible that Marvel movies will use Miles Morales instead of Peter Parker?
Neither company makes this deal to use one of the also ran Spider-men as the lead. It'll be Peter cause that's the general audience draw, it's as simple as that.Regarding this deal, is there anywhere where it says Peter will be used (or even the same actor will be used) in Marvel and Sony movies? Is it possible that Marvel movies will use Miles Morales instead of Peter Parker?
^ Now way! The title should be Spectacular Spider-Man!
I know you linked the cartoon there, but what was the point of the Spectacular comic series? What did it bring over Amazing?
The point of various Spider-Man titles is to have new books in the stores every week rather than waiting an entire month.
Regarding this deal, is there anywhere where it says Peter will be used (or even the same actor will be used) in Marvel and Sony movies? Is it possible that Marvel movies will use Miles Morales instead of Peter Parker?
Except going with the Raimi films means having a film series where Green Goblin is dead, Doc Ock is dead, and Venom and the symbiote are dead.
Would Marvel really want a universe where three major villains are unusable due to them being dead?
I'd love to see a Miles Morales Spidey movie someday... but not for the Spidey who's going to be crossing over and interacting with other Marvel characters. That one just has to be Peter Parker.
Except going with the Raimi films means having a film series where Green Goblin is dead, Doc Ock is dead, and Venom and the symbiote are dead.
Would Marvel really want a universe where three major villains are unusable due to them being dead?
True, but personally I think it would be worth it to see Toby Maguire return as a slightly older version of the character. I know a lot of people here couldn't stand him, but I thought he captured the geeky, boyish enthusiasm of the comic character so much better than Garfield (and that's even without having as many one-liners), and think it would be fun as hell to watch him geeking out over the Avengers as well.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.