• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Antonia

Yes. Because we didn't care about Kirk leaving Antonia - and Kirk didn't seem too bothered either - it weakened the narrative of the Nexus being this wonderful awful addictive place that was so difficult to leave.
 
There's so many mixed messages about the Nexus in the movie.

Guinan says it's addictive (like crack, presumably) and almost impossible to leave once you're in there, and Soran is desperate to return there because it's the only place he can find true happiness. Yet, Picard and Kirk each come to the realisation that the Nexus is patently false with disarming ease (Picard a little quicker than Kirk, it must be said), and left there and went back to Veridian III in a microsecond.

As a concept in a TV episode, ala the space device in "The Inner Light", I think good things could've been done with the Nexus. But the movie doesn't do any of them, because by the point they finally get into the Nexus, they've haven't got a lot of time left to resolve the plot and roll the credits. So they just kind of fumble the play. :p
 
Did the Generations people (i.e. Berman, Braga, etc.) ever explain why they went with Antonia instead of Edith Keeler, Janet Wallace or any other of the established love interests for Kirk?

I would've thought having Edith Keeler at the top of that hill would've been a powerful moment.

Made doubly so by Kirk's decision to walk away, making it more sorrowful and heroic.

What if Kirk's last words weren't, "Oh, my." but "Edith..."

Damn.
I think Kirk would have realized sooner or later that Edith Keeler was dead, partly because of him.

Janet Wallace had an old man fetish.

And Antonia... well, I had never heard of her before.


I have it on good authority that they thought of Carol Marcus for a while but changed their minds.
 
They didn't even have to show Joan Collins...they could've easily CGI'd her in the distance, no different from how Antonia was presented.

I doubt they could've used Collins' likeness without her permission. There are rules against that sort thing.

Well, maybe the Nexus "wants" its inhabitants to never leave? And to do so, it makes them forget who they are as much as possible... Ergo, it takes vague, emotional desires (family, an earthy, work-filled retirement) and creates scenarios based on those tones rather than facts or specific memories. The Nexus thus doesn't care about Edith Keeler or Picard's interest archeological history, and it certainly doesn't want its captures thinking very much, or brushing up against an uncanny valley effect.

I like this idea. A clever extrapolation from the facts the movie presents to us.

Personally, I've long been of the opinion that Antonia (and Kirk's temporary retirement) were both imaginary. I think she was someone that Kirk might've met in passing or never got to be introduced to who became a symbol of a great "might have been" in Kirk's life.

Sort of like this monologue from Bernstein in Citizen Kane:

"A fellow will remember a lot of things you wouldn't think he'd remember. You take me. One day, back in 1896, I was crossing over to Jersey on the ferry, and as we pulled out, there was another ferry pulling in, and on it there was a girl waiting to get off. A white dress she had on. She was carrying a white parasol. I only saw her for one second. She didn't see me at all, but I'll bet a month hasn't gone by since that I haven't thought of that girl."

Could Antonia be Kirk's Minuet?;)
 
The thing is, the Nexus wasn't reality. Picard realized it, then Guinan's "echo" showed up to reinforce it. Kirk realized it wasn't real when his horse didn't hesitate at the jump.

I think the whole point is that our Captains' realities were stronger than the pull of whatever the Nexus offered.

EDIT: I don't get why people would prefer to stick a cameo into something that clearly, from my point of view, would be fanwank and therefore unnecessary.

It wasn't the horse that hesitated (If it did, it could have killed them both), it was Kirk that felt apprehension each time, but not this time.
 
It means you're stating the obvious: In the movie, Kirk says, "The day I told her I was going back to Starfleet." That implies he had left or semi-retired or retired?

When was that in the timeline, you think?

During TOS? Prior to TMP? Obviously it was after TMP.
Still not sure why you think this need to pointed out.

It's ok. Don't worry about it. :)
Well, that's a load off. I had begun to loose sleep and drink heavily.
 
You guys are forgetting something. Just before Kirk sees Antonia on the hill waiting for him, he makes the jump over the brook that he admits he used to do all the time and which scared him every time. As he tells Picard, it doesn't scare him this time. Kirk realizes it isn't real. Kirk realizes too that Antonia is not real.

Kirk however knows Edith was real. He also knows that he had to let her die to save the future of mankind. To have Edith in the Nexus would seem to me to be the shiny bow ribbon on the big bright neon sign in the Nexus saying "HAHA SUCKER! NONE OF THIS SHIT IS REAL!" and for Kirk, that isn't enough of a way of life for him. If the Nexus is supposed to be utter contentment, then yes Edith being there could certainly and believably fufill that function. However, contentment for Kirk isn't in being with the love of his life. Why not Miramanee? Why not Carol? The scene as it plays out reveals not that Antonia was the "joy he coudl wrap himself up in a blanket with," but perhaps rather Kirk being there, ready when Picard needs him to help and to make a difference one more time -- that's Kirk's contentment. To matter.

We see it all through the beginning of the film, that he's dead weight to the crew of the Enterprise-B, despite being celebrated. It's why he jumps to action when the crisis with the Lakul starts, and it's why he's willing to go below decks to play Jenga with the engine parts or whatever the hell he does to save the day. And it's why he decides to go back with Picard to try to stop Soran, even though "the odds are against us and the situation's grim."

Generations has a lot of problems with its script and story, but Antonia is not one of them.
 
Last edited:
Yes. Because we didn't care about Kirk leaving Antonia - and Kirk didn't seem too bothered either - it weakened the narrative of the Nexus being this wonderful awful addictive place that was so difficult to leave.

Yep, that was my point. We're beaten over the head with the fact that the Nexus is so addictive that you'll never want to leave it (Guinan), and if you do, you'll do anything to get back (Soran). And yet Picard and Kirk find it very easy to leave and never come back. This is the biggest flaw of all in the film.

The only way this would actually work is if Picard never really left the Nexus. His meeting with Kirk, return to the real world, defeating Soran, FC, INS, NEM, and all the rest never actually happened, and it's all just a Nexus-induced fantasy.
 
The only way this would actually work is if Picard never really left the Nexus. His meeting with Kirk, return to the real world, defeating Soran, FC, INS, NEM, and all the rest never actually happened, and it's all just a Nexus-induced fantasy.
that would also explain why we don't see Picard and Co helping Spock out in his mindmeld flashback :D
 
The assumption is that Kirk retired sometime between TMP and TWOK. It would make a little sense. Admiral Kirk loses command of the Enterprise again, decides to leave Starfleet this time instead of say behind a desk. Yet something calls to him to go back even if it is to the Academy. At least he can still take rides on Enterprise.

In a world he decides to stay retired with this woman, things change. Perhaps he was responsible for at least part of the Genesis Project and without him, they wouldn't get the funding so USS Reliant never goes to Ceti Alpha V. Khan doesn't get his revenge, Spock doesn't die, the Enterprise stays in service in some capacity. David doesn't get killed by Klingons. Of course there is the whole Whalesong problem, but if Spock is still Captain of the Enterprise, even as a training ship, he would have figured out the solution with or without Kirk. And Enterprise would be more suited to getting some whales than that Bird of Prey. Enterprise-Spock save the day and Kirk goes on riding his horses.
Captain spock (on a new ship not Ent A) would deal with sybok possibly without having the ship hijacked (as his ship would've been fully functional). Then overseen the peace stuff with the Klingons (maybe the outcome would've been similar) the Ent B gets its launch without Kirk (or Spock). Don't manage to save anyone. Guinan and Soran remain in the nexus. (which would mean the federation would be destroyed by the Klingons)


I would assume Enterprise under Spock would remain in service after her training crews as she's not have been damaged. A year later (assuming Excelsior didn't blow herself up testing the transwarp drive) Starfleet sends Enterprise with a trainee crew out to Nimbus III were the matter is solved due to the ship being fully functional from the start.

Enterprise remains in service until around the time of Khitomer-Praxis. One assumes that somehow the plot is foiled by Captain Spock or Captain Sulu (or even Captain Chekov assuming he gets promoted on USS Reliant by then). Enterprise is retired and a new USS Enterprise is launched as an Excelsior-class vessel (perhaps without an "-A"). The Nexus thing may or may not happen as is.

History presses on. Captain Picard eventually takes command of a new Galaxy-class starship. Perhaps named Enterprise. But would it be the NCC-1701-C/D Probably not. It might have a regular number like NCC-71811
 
Yes. Because we didn't care about Kirk leaving Antonia - and Kirk didn't seem too bothered either - it weakened the narrative of the Nexus being this wonderful awful addictive place that was so difficult to leave.

Yep, that was my point. We're beaten over the head with the fact that the Nexus is so addictive that you'll never want to leave it (Guinan), and if you do, you'll do anything to get back (Soran). And yet Picard and Kirk find it very easy to leave and never come back. This is the biggest flaw of all in the film.

The only way this would actually work is if Picard never really left the Nexus. His meeting with Kirk, return to the real world, defeating Soran, FC, INS, NEM, and all the rest never actually happened, and it's all just a Nexus-induced fantasy.

Except Picard's life, especially in Nemesis, with Shizon and Data's death, is pretty depressing.
 
Except Picard's life, especially in Nemesis, with Shizon and Data's death, is pretty depressing.
Little did you know, that's what he's really into. :evil:

Well. That, and this:

23gxtw6.jpg
 
We're beaten over the head with the fact that the Nexus is so addictive that you'll never want to leave it (Guinan), and if you do, you'll do anything to get back (Soran). And yet Picard and Kirk find it very easy to leave and never come back. This is the biggest flaw of all in the film.
Well, okay, but it's also quite easily explained away - Picard and Kirk made conscious decisions to leave the Nexus, whereas Guinan and Soran were ripped out, and the trauma of the latter method is incomparably worse than the former process. (But they wouldn't know that; they'd only know how awful it was for them.) One could, if one were so inclined, make a crude analogy to different forms of sex, which I won't spell out any further. Fan apologism? Sure, guilty as charged... and it's a finding I can live with. ;)
 
It should have been Carol Marcus, IMO. And I suspect the reason they invented a new lost love instead of using someone known, was the same penny-pinching that led to Nick Whatshisname being changed to Tom Paris, or T'Pau becoming T'Pol in ENT.
 
It should have been Carol Marcus, IMO. And I suspect the reason they invented a new lost love instead of using someone known, was the same penny-pinching that led to Nick Whatshisname being changed to Tom Paris, or T'Pau becoming T'Pol in ENT.

Carol, Edith, Janet, ANYONE would've been better than Antonia.

Greg explained it so much better than I did.
 
Meh. All it means is that Kirk had another love interest later in life. Hardly unbelievable, and also at the same time also not universe shrinking, either. I'm ok with that.
 
Meh. All it means is that Kirk had another love interest later in life. Hardly unbelievable, and also at the same time also not universe shrinking, either. I'm ok with that.

It's believable, it's just not very interesting. The result is an audience who doesn't really care about the scene they're watching. If they'd brought out Rand, Carol, Edith, then the fans would have been more invested in the scene.
 
The movie wasn't about appealing only to fans though. Sure, it's a nice little bone to throw our way, but the point of the scene isn't that this is the love of Kirk's life. The point of the scene is that he realizes none of it is real. Had it been Edith, he absolutely would have known it was all an illusion. Had it been Rand, Carol or someone else (Ruth?), maybe it could have worked, but it's a lot of trouble to go to for something only a minor contingent of the overall viewership of the film would have really been able to appreciate.

Besides, I like the idea that there were still other love interests for Kirk after Carol.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top