It will be a Manufactured Soul and Disk Operating System, aka MS-DOS.
Evangelists for this kind of thing usually skip the "figuring out how it works" phase by chanting the magic word Singularity!". Kurzweil is an example.
I'm convinced that within my lifetime there will be a mind upload cult that commits suicide trying to upload themselves.I always find these threads interesting for how efficiently they deconstruct Singularity evangelism.
The problem is that the original poster doesn't seem to be interested in the actual discussion. So he might just end up posting the same stuff again in a few weeks.
RAMA's posts certainly contain a certain quasi-religious enthusiasm.
I'm convinced that within my lifetime there will be a mind upload cult that commits suicide trying to upload themselves.The problem is that the original poster doesn't seem to be interested in the actual discussion. So he might just end up posting the same stuff again in a few weeks.
RAMA's posts certainly contain a certain quasi-religious enthusiasm.
I'm convinced that within my lifetime there will be a mind upload cult that commits suicide trying to upload themselves.RAMA's posts certainly contain a certain quasi-religious enthusiasm.
If we're lucky, might just get rid of a few of them.
I would. In a heartbeat. And I would name my digital copies "Lazy Eddie", "Wavy Eddie" and "Sane Eddie." We would make a kickass fleet in STO and the Halo 5 multiplayer community would learn to fear our wrath. There's also about a million little side projects I've always wanted to tackle but never have time for; Lazy Eddie would tackle most of those.Then again, even if you could upload your mind to a computer, who'd actually want to
I would. In a heartbeat. And I would name my digital copies "Lazy Eddie", "Wavy Eddie" and "Sane Eddie."
As long as I can play Tetris while I'm uploaded I'm game.
No one understands what consciousness is, how it works or what it's "for;" the so-called "hard problem." Folks who are convinced for some reason that we're on the verge of what they call machines that are "aware" just cite the rapid growth of processing power and storage and suggest, for no good reason, that at some point conscious intelligence will somehow happen. There's no evidence for that, of course.
No one understands what consciousness is, how it works or what it's "for;" the so-called "hard problem." Folks who are convinced for some reason that we're on the verge of what they call machines that are "aware" just cite the rapid growth of processing power and storage and suggest, for no good reason, that at some point conscious intelligence will somehow happen. There's no evidence for that, of course.
I think consciousness is the process of building. I believe that a human is comprised of many singular microbial that are controlled to perform a function by what are called mitochondria.
Why would you eat and drink if you were uploaded? There's more to life than just food, especially if you were digital and no longer had any need to eat or drink. You could spend the rest eternity recreating Tron and never stop for a break since you would never get tired.Then again, even if you could upload your mind to a computer, who'd actually want to, when for all you know, the money to build a new body runs out, and your trapped, with no way to eat, drink, or otherwise enjoy your new immortality.
In other words, you'd be sort of imprisoned, and be completely dependent on people maintaining the computer and servers, because if they crash, this time, you die for good.
I am 100% convinced that the brain is a mechanism. I am also 100% convinced that you can build a replacement for it because it happens every time a person grows. I am also 99.9% convinced that this scientist will not upload his brain to a computer.Neuroscientists are 99.9% percent convinced that the brain is a mechanism, he says. It is something that computes, something that carries out functions. If you can figure out how it works, you can build a replacement for it.
First and foremost, The Daily Mail isn't exactly a bastion of truthful and ethical journalism (translation: it's a rag) and I'm leery of any story that a more reputable newspaper doesn't bother to cover. Second, who are these neuroscientists who are 99.9% certain about this? I can't find a link to any name, never mind an article or proper scientific paper. Third, I clicked on all the names listed on your third link, and only Koene himself is a neuroscientist. Not one of the other authors is a scientist; they are mostly philosophers and ethicists, so this is not a sci & tech OP so much as a philosophical one.
I'll leave the thread open for now to see if it develops any discussion suitable for this forum, but it's treading a fine line.
As an aside, I see no positives in living forever in any kind of way. Sounds incredibly egotistic to me.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.