^
You're funny. You expect real science from a science fiction show about an immortal alien obsessed with the British Isles that flies around in a blue police phone box. That spins as it flies. Like a Christmas ornament you can spin with your fingers. Um, okay.
Making this a bit personal, I see.
The Doctor is "obsessed" with the British Isles because it's a British TV show. It makes sense to emphasize the UK, just as American shows tend to emphasize American stuff and for Canadian shows to emphasize Canada, and for collaborative shows like
Highlander/
Highlander: The Raven to set some episodes in France since a French production company had a part in bringing the show to TV.
It was explained back in
An Unearthly Child why the TARDIS looks like a Police Box. As for why it spins, I just chalked it up to the same reason why some other ships/space stations spin: it's how they have artificial gravity so the people inside aren't floating around in zero-g.
I don't necessarily expect real science from Doctor Who. But I don't expect outright fantasy that doesn't make even the tiniest smidgen of sense. I expect that when the show trots out science, that it be at least somewhat plausible, or have a damn good reason for why it isn't. Saying "because it's alien" isn't good enough. That's just like saying "because it's magic."
I picked 1973 as a random Classic Who year. Anything pre-2005 would suffice for you guys (who hate the nuSeries but continue to watch it just so you can hate it....interesting), but I picked something from the 70's since that's the decade that inspires the most love-fests.
That's a rather presumptuous line of reasoning. I dislike nuWho because so much of it is poorly-written fantasy drivel that doesn't even try to make any sense, plus all the stuff with the companions' love lives and family angst makes me think that I'm watching "General TARDIS" instead of Doctor Who.
I don't watch it so I can hate it. I watch it because I want to find something good about it... but it's not easy to do, because there's not much to find. I've seen Christopher Eccleston in other things, and he's pretty good. There were some good stories in his run - especially the Dalek one where the Doctor mentions the Time War. I haven't seen David Tennant in anything else, but have been considering watching his Hamlet DVD. Matt Smith... I never want to see him or his version of the Doctor again. Ever. As for Capaldi, I don't hate his Doctor. I hate the writing and the companion he's been saddled with.
Clara was the 50th Anniversary companion. Her story arc totally makes sense to me as the girl who saved the Doctor, traveling through his entire timestream, and who now will likely be his apprentice. She is a companion that connects the past to the present, CELEBRATING the show's history. Becoming the successor to Susan, in a way. If not the Doctor's granddaughter, then someone who is very close to him and has influence on his life, and he on hers. I fail to see what's wrong with that.
Well, Jo Grant was the 10th Anniversary companion, along with the U.N.I.T. team of the Brigadier, Yates, and Benton. The 20th anniversary companions were Tegan and Turlough, along with Susan, Jamie, Zoe, the Brigadier, Liz Shaw, Mike Yates, Sarah Jane, K-9, and Romana II. It was great to see all of them, but none of them were ever considered special enough to be The Super-Companion Of All Time.
What really disgusted me about this Clara Oswald, Supercompanion was how she was retconned into Classic Who. "Oh, you thought the Doctor and his companions got out of their sticky situations by themselves and solved the problems in their episodes? Nope, they weren't smart enough to do that, it was really SuperClara who saved everyone! And to make that perfectly clear, we're going to do some creative editing and delete one companion from
Castrovalva and insert SuperClara there instead! Because it totally makes sense that a woman who can't figure out how to use a laptop is obviously better suited to solve a mathematical logic problem than a companion who really is a mathematically-gifted person!"
Clara was never in any of the Classic stories. If they wanted a real bridge between Classic and nuWho, they should have had Paul McGann in the anniversary special, instead of John Hurt.
The Doctor wouldn't bother with companions if he could do it all alone and not turn into Mr. Grumpypants in the process. What's wrong with a companion like Clara who is special to him and he to her?
What's wrong with the show and its character dynamics evolving? It's been 50 years, after all.
There's nothing wrong with the Doctor having a companion he considers special. All the Doctors have had companions to whom they were good friends. But in Classic Who, those companions didn't eat the damn show!
This show is no longer Doctor Who. It's Doctor Who and Clara (or Clara and Doctor Who) in their little soap opera where they routinely lie and deceive each other. That's not Doctor Who. It's not even how nuWho started. Eccleston's Doctor didn't run around lying to people, and when Rose crossed the line, she didn't get insta-forgiveness, either.
The show has been evolving... backwards. Asking people to accept such crap as the Moon really being an egg, and that nonsense with the trees, and changing the reasons why things happen/unhappen isn't the mark of a science fiction series that has adult viewers (which the BBC should damn well be aware of by now). It's the mark of a TV show that thinks its primary audience is made up of 8-year-olds who read Grimm's fairy tales and think it's scientific.