• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Season 9/Christmas special speculation *spoilers*

Hardly a surprise, that guarantees him for the standard three year term for a Doctor.

Not sure if there's such a thing as a standard 3 year term?! Ecclestone? No. Tennant? No. Smith? Ok, 1 out of 3 so far. Capalid, not sure!

Mr Awe

Well, five out of twelve Doctors did three years (Hartnell, Troughton, Davison, McCoy, Smith) and technically Tennant only did three actual seasons, the rest of his term was spent doing specials. Most Doctors do a minimum of three years, and the ones that haven't were under extenuating circumstances, C Baker was fired, McGann's term was cut short by the 96 movie's failure to launch a series, and Eccleston turned down a second season. So yeah, I consider a three year term to be the standard for most Doctors.

What you really mean is a three year minimum, not a three year standard run.

Mr Awe
 
Who is "Tom McGann"? :cardie:

and Patrick Davison ;)

Only thing with the list is that from 9 onwards on every episode is just about equal to two classic series episodes, so that needs to be refined further.

Looking at approximately 22 minutes each (new series being double classic episode length):

Tom Baker 172 episodes
William Hartnell 134 episodes
Jon Pertwee 128 episodes
Patrick Troughton 119 episodes
David Tennant 94 episodes
Matt Smith 88 episodes
Peter Davison 69 episodes
Sylvester McCoy 42 episodes
Colin Baker 31 episodes
Christopher Eccleston 26 episodes
Peter Capaldi (so far) 24 episodes (26 if we include the upcoming xmas special)
Paul McGann 4+ episodes (90 min movie plus NOTD)

By this logic Peter Capaldi will, at the very least, have more episodes than Sylvester McCoy after the already commissioned series 9.
 
Last edited:
Although he kept silent for a long time he's been quite open in recent years about the fact that he didn't carry on because of problems with the behaviour of the people making the series.

And while it's true that it was pretty much a miracle that the first series made it to air, everyone involved was trying to invent the way to produce a type of series that the British TV industry had no real experience making, so his attitude strikes me as a bit unfair.
Not having any experience and being overworked trying to make it up as they go might excuse some levels of unprofessional behavior by production staff, but not the behavior on-set attributed to Keith Boak.
 
If Capaldi sticks around that's great. I wouldn't mind seeing McGann again though to fill in some of his back years.
 
If Capaldi sticks around that's great. I wouldn't mind seeing McGann again though to fill in some of his back years.

The Top Gear guys make other short series' between TG series', as fill in. At least BBCA runs them counter to the new TG series'.

No reason BBC couldn't do that with McGann, unless they don't feel there's the same interest level.
 
The Top Gear guys make other short series' between TG series', as fill in. At least BBCA runs them counter to the new TG series'.

No reason BBC couldn't do that with McGann, unless they don't feel there's the same interest level.
It takes a lot less time, and is cheaper, to film Top Gear than Doctor Who. If the BBC wanted "backfill" like that, they'd need to get a whole separate production team and have it running simultaneous with the "main" team.
 
It sounds to me that a combination of factors led to Eccleston leaving the franchise.

The most thorough exploration of Eccleston's departure, that I'm aware of, is in Tat Wood's About Time 7. Wood spends a good (roughly) eight pages on the theories and rumors, documents them as best he (or anyone) can, and dismisses several.

Wood's conclusion is that Eccleston was amenable to starring in the second series, but circumstances got ahead of him and the decision was ultimately taken out of his hands.
 
If Capaldi sticks around that's great. I wouldn't mind seeing McGann again though to fill in some of his back years.

The Top Gear guys make other short series' between TG series', as fill in. At least BBCA runs them counter to the new TG series'.

No reason BBC couldn't do that with McGann, unless they don't feel there's the same interest level.
I was secretly hoping that because we are getting one less episode this year that they might be saving up for one or two McGann specials. Would love it. A easter special each year filling in the missing years.
 
If Capaldi sticks around that's great. I wouldn't mind seeing McGann again though to fill in some of his back years.

The Top Gear guys make other short series' between TG series', as fill in. At least BBCA runs them counter to the new TG series'.

No reason BBC couldn't do that with McGann, unless they don't feel there's the same interest level.
I was secretly hoping that because we are getting one less episode this year that they might be saving up for one or two McGann specials. Would love it. A easter special each year filling in the missing years.

Except, we aren't really getting "one less episode" since Deep Breath was a double episode.

And really, I wouldn't hold my breath on a Paul McGann season or special or anything. In BBC's eyes, the current Doctor is the Doctor and the former Doctors are never revisited on screen unless it's for an anniversary special or a team-up episode like The Two Doctors. I wouldn't count on any team-ups this soon after Day of the Doctor either.
 
I was secretly hoping that because we are getting one less episode this year that they might be saving up for one or two McGann specials. Would love it. A easter special each year filling in the missing years.

I used to think that for the Doctor-lite episode they used to do each year that they could do a McGann story in that slot, perhaps to show an earlier confrontation between the the Doctor and the season's Big Bad. But the Doctor-lite essentially went away, and I've changed my mind on whether or not a "flashback" episode like that would be a good idea. Essentially, I've come to think that it wouldn't be; it would be a disaster with the Not-We.
 
^ Nah, it wouldn't be a disaster, at least it wouldn't have to be. You just need a framing device. Have the current Doctor reminisce about an adventure he had in a previous incarnation. Problem solved. Bonus points if the previous adventure is tied to a current arc.

Mr Awe
 
AThe thing is, with Clara anyway, they could easily insert her character into a story involving any Doctor. Having Paul McGann's TARDIS show up one day near Coal Hill and Clara run up to it only to get the "wrong" Doctor would not be out of place. He might even recongnizer her as someone with a similar name (one of the Clara fragments in his time stream) and just run off like nothing it wrong...or just have the Doctor slightly puzzled, as he didn't remember her being in this time, but she just lies to him and runs off because "adventure", and he's not as grumpy as 12.
 
AThe thing is, with Clara anyway, they could easily insert her character into a story involving any Doctor. Having Paul McGann's TARDIS show up one day near Coal Hill and Clara run up to it only to get the "wrong" Doctor would not be out of place. He might even recongnizer her as someone with a similar name (one of the Clara fragments in his time stream) and just run off like nothing it wrong...or just have the Doctor slightly puzzled, as he didn't remember her being in this time, but she just lies to him and runs off because "adventure", and he's not as grumpy as 12.
While I truly wish we could have Paul McGann stories on TV (or even just online), I doubt it would happen - it might draw people away from the Capaldi stories (if I had to choose one or the other, it would be an easy choice if they don't get rid of the liar). Of course they could always time it so one was airing while the other was on hiatus, but that would make sense.
 
Clara... just get rid of her! Let her adopt the kid Danny sent back. Either the kid will take Danny's last name or Clara will be pregnant with Danny's baby and eventually Orson Pink will exist as he's meant to. But let her be gone, hopefully with a reasonably happy ending, never to return. The Doctor needs a new Companion.

According to Moffat, Orson is a cousin or somesuch to Danny; he's not descended from Danny and Clara, and if fans assumed otherwise it's because he was being deliberately vague about the relationship in "Listen."
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top