What if, instead of a women, the Doctor comes back as one of his old faces? Either recast to be basically on of the older Doctors, or one of the actual actors coming back as the Doctor. Like say, Paul McGann as the 8th and 13th Doctors.
Yes she will, and yes, I'm ready for it.
I'd be surprised if the next Doctor was a woman. Wouldn't matter to me if it was. After all, all that matters is getting the best actor or actress for the part.
My bigger worry would be if the current writing staff could manage to write a solid, Doctor story without dragging down the story to focus on the Doctor's new gender. It shouldn't matter, the Doctor is the Doctor; like any other regeneration, you just write the Doctor. But I'd be a bit concerned about them focusing on the novelty of what had happened.
Well, if Moffatt will be writing it, you know there will be a cheap gag of the week. Look, he didn't stop that "Doctor? Doctor Who?" for a long time.
Didn't we already have that with Matt Smith? Good riddance to all that silliness.Personally I think an outrageously camp male doctor would have been pretty good, it'd be unique to the show and a more interesting take on the show.
I would love to see McGann as the Doctor in whatever way TPTB could manage, whether on TV or in webisodes. Considering how perfectly he nailed the role in the TV movie and in the webisode 17 years later, it's a damn shame he never got his chance to be the Doctor in a series. I've no idea if he was disappointed, but a lot of fans certainly were.Tom Baker's 'revisiting a few old faces' line in DOTD paved the way for this (I think there was talk of recasting Patrick Troughton as the seventh Doctor at a time).What if, instead of a women, the Doctor comes back as one of his old faces? Either recast to be basically on of the older Doctors, or one of the actual actors coming back as the Doctor. Like say, Paul McGann as the 8th and 13th Doctors.
But it's hard to see the benefit, unless, for example, ratings had plunged and they felt that the return of a Tennant or Smith would revive fortunes. Which would beg the interesting dilemma - would they play the role as per their previous incarnation or would they do an entirely new take on it?
McGann would be the more interesting choice. But my preference is still to have a series of specials or web series with him playing Eight. I'd like to see more about this little-seen Doctor than have Paul play a new incarnation. I still think it would be a good way of keeping the series on air if the incumbent wanted to take a year off. Do a series of specials like in Tennant's final year - but with McGann instead of 12/13/14 whoever.
They already overdo this sort of thing. It used to be that other than a couple of humorous, self-deprecating lines about ears or noses, that was all. They just got on with the stories and didn't dwell on the actor's age, facial features, accent, or anything else.I think they'd have to focus on the novelty of it, for a while at least, in the same way they mentioned Smith's youthfulness or Capldi being Scottish, it would be kinda weird if they didn't.I'd be surprised if the next Doctor was a woman. Wouldn't matter to me if it was. After all, all that matters is getting the best actor or actress for the part.
My bigger worry would be if the current writing staff could manage to write a solid, Doctor story without dragging down the story to focus on the Doctor's new gender. It shouldn't matter, the Doctor is the Doctor; like any other regeneration, you just write the Doctor. But I'd be a bit concerned about them focusing on the novelty of what had happened.
The problem is not overdoing it, first couple of stories and an occasional mention fine, but if there's a cheap gag week in week out the concept will fail.
He does often complain about never having been a GingerIrish Woman, with bright Ginger hair, as the next Doctor. That should make the fanbase freak out.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.