• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Should the Borg be the villain in Trek 3?

borg for Trek 3


  • Total voters
    198
Status
Not open for further replies.
Further, with the Borg as the villain, what's the end game? Are they all destroyed? Or, is it a conflict with a small group of Borg separated from the hive, and they foreshadow an eventual run-in with the entire collective in the future? Would an ending like that be the best way a movie celebrating fifty years of Trek could end? On the realization that Starfleet will have to remilitarize and divert its resources to build ships and weapons systems even more powerful than the Vengeance in order to be ready for the Borg in a few decades? Go out on a dark and foreboding note like that?

I don't think the Borg in the Abramsverse need to be so overpowering like they were in the Prime timeline. I think they are ripe for reinvention. You can do a story about technology run amok. Heck, you could plop the Enterprise down in a story about a world fighting the Borg offshoots from "Regeneration". I don't think Starfleet would have to remilitarize from a single instance on a far off world anymore than Starfleet began an instant militarization after "Q, Who?". Sure they did research, but the whole organization didn't flip a switch into being monsters and I think this Starfleet would be even more aware of the perils of overreacting to an outside force after what happened with Admiral Marcus.

You could do some nice character work with a Kirk forced into a decision he simply doesn't want to have to make. The eradication of a world's population (shades of "Operation: Annihilate!"). Is it heavy for a 50th Anniversary? Probably. But I really don't want them trying their hand at comedy, the results haven't been very good so far.

I could go for something like that. Just not too heavy. I like the idea of technology run amok v. Trek technology, because Trek has always tended to take a positive view of technological advances and the utilitarianism of technology. That technology stripped the Borg of their humanity was another terrible thing about them.

Edited to add, though. I would be worried about one thing. The Borg are more or less one trick ponies once you get to know them. We've seen their schtick. So, if they're ripe for reinvention in the Abramsverse, why not reinvent them all the way into something completely new? Maybe solve the entire Borg civilization problem by making them a species indigenous to one planet, exhibiting a lot of what made the Borg awesome Trek opponents, but with some twists? Maybe they are androids similar to Data. Maybe the debate about how to deal with them has to do with recognizing them as sentient or not. Are they just machines that can be summarily wiped out, or real beings?
 
Last edited:
Fun adventure doesn't have to be slow and tedious. It can fit the length. It also doesn't have to lack action. While not great, Star Trek V proved it could be done. With good writing we could have a great Adventure film.

But precisely: STV *was* not great -- it bombed at the box office, which just goes to prove my point. Given the amount invested in production, studios will take absolutely no chance on such a venture.

Star Trek IV didn't have a villain so to speak,...

Trek IV was successful because it broke the mould and "boldly went" where no Trek had gone before. It was neither a "bad guy" movie, nor a "cerebral exploration" movie. What made it successful was that it was funny and made fun of itself. It also put the audience "in" the movie, by having it in 20th century America.
 
Last edited:
Remember the TNG episode Parallels? And Riker from the universe where the Borg defeated everyone? What if an older Kirk from a universe where Kirk and company did fight the Borg instead of Picard interferes and the Borg invade this universe earlier than expected?

Maybe too Doomsday Machine-ish but it could work, You get old Kirk. Shatner gets a meaty role. You get the Borg. You get both Shatner and Nimoy.

This was always a great moment.

Riker_gone_mad.jpg
 
First Contact is an entertaining movie. I don't think it holds up very well these days though, it looks very dated. More so than Generations even. I loved it at the time but it looks very cheap, almost quaint next to modern movies.
 
Maybe this bridge in "Parallels" is the 24th century Abramsverse. It seems to have that "Apple Store" vibe.

http://img2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb.../14/Enterprise-D_bridge,_parallel_reality.jpg

Considering the Abramsverse 1701 is already significantly larger than the Prime Enterprise D, and the Abramsverse is already capable of building the even larger Vengeance, I don't see why the Abramsverse Enterprise D would be the same size as its Prime Universe counterpart.

I love First Contact, but the TNG movies looked like big screen TV episodes.

Generations and Insurrection certainly are, and admitted by-product of being written by writers more familiar with TV, or with Generations, directed and produced by people more familiar with TV as well. First Contact and Nemesis feel more like movies.
 
Maybe this bridge in "Parallels" is the 24th century Abramsverse. It seems to have that "Apple Store" vibe.

http://img2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb.../14/Enterprise-D_bridge,_parallel_reality.jpg

Considering the Abramsverse 1701 is already significantly larger than the Prime Enterprise D, and the Abramsverse is already capable of building the even larger Vengeance, I don't see why the Abramsverse Enterprise D would be the same size as its Prime Universe counterpart.

1. I was joking, considering it preceded the Abramsverse by almost 20 years.

2. Even if it were the nu-1071-D, where is there any indication of the ship's scale? After all, the Vengeance bridge is the same size as the nu-E's, but the ship is clearly bigger. And, one would expect more compactness in 70+ years of design evolution. Why wouldn't a 24th century starship have about 5 people on the bridge?
 
2. Even if it were the nu-1071-D, where is there any indication of the ship's scale? After all, the Vengeance bridge is the same size as the nu-E's, but the ship is clearly bigger. And, one would expect more compactness in 70+ years of design evolution. Why wouldn't a 24th century starship have about 5 people on the bridge?

Well, it was the same size as all the other Enterprise Ds when they started popping in. I would think an Abramsverse Enterprise D would drastically dwarf the whole group of them.
 
^ Maybe, maybe not. Enough time had passed, new production people other than the TV regulars for ST 2-6 allowed them to look and feel different. The TNG movies are TNG episodes: same writers, production, etc.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top