Further, with the Borg as the villain, what's the end game? Are they all destroyed? Or, is it a conflict with a small group of Borg separated from the hive, and they foreshadow an eventual run-in with the entire collective in the future? Would an ending like that be the best way a movie celebrating fifty years of Trek could end? On the realization that Starfleet will have to remilitarize and divert its resources to build ships and weapons systems even more powerful than the Vengeance in order to be ready for the Borg in a few decades? Go out on a dark and foreboding note like that?
I don't think the Borg in the Abramsverse need to be so overpowering like they were in the Prime timeline. I think they are ripe for reinvention. You can do a story about technology run amok. Heck, you could plop the Enterprise down in a story about a world fighting the Borg offshoots from "Regeneration". I don't think Starfleet would have to remilitarize from a single instance on a far off world anymore than Starfleet began an instant militarization after "Q, Who?". Sure they did research, but the whole organization didn't flip a switch into being monsters and I think this Starfleet would be even more aware of the perils of overreacting to an outside force after what happened with Admiral Marcus.
You could do some nice character work with a Kirk forced into a decision he simply doesn't want to have to make. The eradication of a world's population (shades of "Operation: Annihilate!"). Is it heavy for a 50th Anniversary? Probably. But I really don't want them trying their hand at comedy, the results haven't been very good so far.
Fun adventure doesn't have to be slow and tedious. It can fit the length. It also doesn't have to lack action. While not great, Star Trek V proved it could be done. With good writing we could have a great Adventure film.
Star Trek IV didn't have a villain so to speak,...
First Contact is garbage. Why would anyone want to be happy with it?Please no. Can't we just have First Contact and be happy with that?
First Contact is garbage. Why would anyone want to be happy with it?Please no. Can't we just have First Contact and be happy with that?
First Contact is garbage. Why would anyone want to be happy with it?Please no. Can't we just have First Contact and be happy with that?
Maybe this bridge in "Parallels" is the 24th century Abramsverse. It seems to have that "Apple Store" vibe.
http://img2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb.../14/Enterprise-D_bridge,_parallel_reality.jpg
I love First Contact, but the TNG movies looked like big screen TV episodes.
I love First Contact, but the TNG movies looked like big screen TV episodes.
Maybe this bridge in "Parallels" is the 24th century Abramsverse. It seems to have that "Apple Store" vibe.
http://img2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb.../14/Enterprise-D_bridge,_parallel_reality.jpg
Considering the Abramsverse 1701 is already significantly larger than the Prime Enterprise D, and the Abramsverse is already capable of building the even larger Vengeance, I don't see why the Abramsverse Enterprise D would be the same size as its Prime Universe counterpart.
2. Even if it were the nu-1071-D, where is there any indication of the ship's scale? After all, the Vengeance bridge is the same size as the nu-E's, but the ship is clearly bigger. And, one would expect more compactness in 70+ years of design evolution. Why wouldn't a 24th century starship have about 5 people on the bridge?
I love First Contact, but the TNG movies looked like big screen TV episodes.
First Contact would be in my top 5.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.