Well. I said I'd form my opinions based on the evidence, and the pilot and interviews gave me the impression that the show was going for a Nolanesque realism. After the evidence of this episode, I don't know what to make of the show anymore. Some of the cast were still going for a serious, naturalistic tone, but others, like the child abductors, Jada Pinkett-Smith, and Carol Kane, gave the campiest performances I've seen in a Batman production since the Schumacher movies. It's a bizarre clash, like even the producers don't know what kind of show they're making. And the campy parts really made me doubt that this show has a future. It's a throwback to a style of comics-based storytelling that I think audiences have outgrown.
And the script was awful. No trace of subtlety or subtext, everyone just saying outright what they thought or felt in the most prosaic and blatant terms possible, or else in ridiculously broad terms like Fish's line about killing Falcone with her bare hands and teeth. If this is Bruno Heller's approach to dialogue, it deeply disheartens me about this series. Although I did note that Ben Edlund is on board as a producer, which is more encouraging.
The second half wasn't as bad as the first. It was nice to finally discover that Camren Bicondova can actually talk as well as just strike poses, and she did a pretty good job. And Bruce is the most intriguing and effective character on the show -- the scene with him at the end was the one part of the writing I actually found effective, and Mazouz is doing an excellent job. Alfred is not coming off nearly as well, however.
It says something that the most satisfying performances on this show are coming from the teenagers. Honestly I'm not sure how much more of Pinkett-Smith's scenery-chewing I can tolerate.