• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Misconceptions about TOS

That Vulcans have sex once every seven years.
There was this mistake in the old comic book where Joanna McCoy has a Vulcan fiancé. A racist Bones says to her she will only be touched by her husband all seven years.
When we see Spock's parents in Journey to Babel or Spock himself with the Romulan commander, we don't seen any sign of a Vulcan chastity.
 
But the term The Original Series is on official release of the DVD sets, both the original versions and remastered versions. So its not a misconception, it is an official title, at least when it comes to the DVD release. It also just happens to be convenient to refer to it as TOS, on boards like this or in conversations.

Sometimes titles do get changed after the fact. Like TOS's pilot episode. Its working title was "The Cage," but by the time it went into production it was officially titled "The Menagerie," and that was its official title for decades, even after it was expanded into a 2-parter of the same name. But 1981's Star Trek Compendium called it "The Cage" as a convenience to differentiate it from the 2-parter, and when it was released on home video, it was released under that title for the same reason, and that's how it's been officially known ever since.

Much the same was the case with some early Doctor Who serial storylines. Originally the individual episodes had their own titles and the titles for the overall serials were sometimes unclear. The decisions about what blanket titles to use for many of the early serials were only made decades after the fact.
 
In TOS he seldom actually disobeyed orders (I can think of maybe only once, "Amok Time", and even then he's just trying to stretch them rather than break them per se).

He did something very similar in "The Galileo Seven" where Commissioner Ferris orders him to depart the system and he obeys ...without going to warp.
 
This is a huge misconception played up even moreso by the JJtrek films.

Which was started with Star Trek II/III.
Yep, the films began to drift from what had been established in TOS. By TUC they even openly play up the cliches and caricatures.

It can be a sobering experience to watch the films--original and JJ--then watch TOS to see how it was in its prime.
The original movies humanized Kirk Spock and McCoy, made them more relatable. In TOS sure they would go on about loneliness, fear and prejudice but that was always in relation to their job as officers. The movies helped us to get to know them as people finally, with Kirk's aging, the son he never knew, Spock's death, and etc.
 
But the term The Original Series is on official release of the DVD sets, both the original versions and remastered versions. So its not a misconception, it is an official title, at least when it comes to the DVD release. It also just happens to be convenient to refer to it as TOS, on boards like this or in conversations.

Sometimes titles do get changed after the fact. Like TOS's pilot episode. Its working title was "The Cage," but by the time it went into production it was officially titled "The Menagerie," and that was its official title for decades, even after it was expanded into a 2-parter of the same name. But 1981's Star Trek Compendium called it "The Cage" as a convenience to differentiate it from the 2-parter, and when it was released on home video, it was released under that title for the same reason, and that's how it's been officially known ever since.

Much the same was the case with some early Doctor Who serial storylines. Originally the individual episodes had their own titles and the titles for the overall serials were sometimes unclear. The decisions about what blanket titles to use for many of the early serials were only made decades after the fact.

David Gerrold's 1973 edition of The World of Star Trek identifies the pilot as "The Cage" on page 130. That's probably where using the pre-production title originates. Although I am not 100% sure.
 
Which was started with Star Trek II/III.
Yep, the films began to drift from what had been established in TOS. By TUC they even openly play up the cliches and caricatures.

It can be a sobering experience to watch the films--original and JJ--then watch TOS to see how it was in its prime.
The original movies humanized Kirk Spock and McCoy, made them more relatable. In TOS sure they would go on about loneliness, fear and prejudice but that was always in relation to their job as officers. The movies helped us to get to know them as people finally, with Kirk's aging, the son he never knew, Spock's death, and etc.
Meh.
 
The original movies humanized Kirk Spock and McCoy, made them more relatable. In TOS sure they would go on about loneliness, fear and prejudice but that was always in relation to their job as officers. The movies helped us to get to know them as people finally, with Kirk's aging, the son he never knew, Spock's death, and etc.

I don't really agree with this, at all.

So much of Spock's character was about him being an outsider. Kirk, while more tethered to his job, also suffered numerous personal tragedies. Edith Keeler in the past and his brother on Deneva.

The characters were definitely very human in TOS.
 
David Gerrold's 1973 edition of The World of Star Trek identifies the pilot as "The Cage" on page 130. That's probably where using the pre-production title originates. Although I am not 100% sure.

But since the Compendium was a reference book and used that title in its formal episode guide, I think that codified the usage. I'm not saying it was never used before then, but it became consistently used after then. And of course it was the home video release under that title that locked it in for good, much as the DVD releases codified the usages of The Original Series and The Animated Series as subtitles to the two shows originally entitled Star Trek.
 
Which was started with Star Trek II/III.

I think 2 established that he had a bit of a rebellious flair, especially in his youth. 3 was the most renegade he ever was and it was for a good reason, plus it had serious repercussions. I can't think of any time in real history when a flag officer has been demoted back to Colonel/Captain or whatever. That's literally reversing a presidential decision.

But in case the "demotion" serves as a narrative device to close the arc started in The Wrath of Khan and gets Kirk back in the captain's chair now that he's come to terms with his age.

In universe, it's intended as a reward for saving the planet. I'm sure if some flag officer ever saves the entire world/country he/she will immediately be granted whatever demotion/promotion he/she wants. haha
 
While TWOK's aspirations were never as lofty as TMP, I never thought of the film as being middle of the road or nonsensical. From an emotional standpoint, it's the only mature film in the series, as Kirk and company have to face some of the very same real issues that people in the audience face, as opposed to the trumped up "fate of the galaxy" or "coming to terms with my human/vulcan/robot limitations" sorts of emotions the other films offer. It's the only film that really humanizes the characters in a way that is understandable to many.

TWOK works as both a popcorn movie, with the space battles, and as an attempt to actually have a drama, with ideas and themes never really dealt with in ST, let alone space opera in general. Aging, failed relationships, "accidental" children, and the like. In 1982, this was practically unheard of in science fiction. For a lot of people, that signaled a move toward a sort of maturity that ST hadn't had since its first season.

TMP is, perhaps, the only real "film" of the series, but it substitutes rather two-dimensional characterizations for the pretense of a far more important story. In this, it too often bogs down under its sense of self-importance. It works more or less but on a different level. What so many people found off-putting about it was not just the slow pacing but the fact that no one really behaved very much like any person they knew. McCoy was about the only character who seemed to have emotional dimension, and most of his scenes were reduced to the cliches we would expect.

I don't know that TWOK is where the idea of the renegade Kirk surfaced. For starters, there's nothing concrete that says he was such. We get Carol's "never a boy scout" line and McCoy's informing Saavik that Kirk beat the no-one scenario. Then Kirk acknowledges that he reprogrammed the simulator. That could be taken as Kirk nodding to his rebellious youth, or we could just as easily have a wisftul 50-something Kirk simply reminiscing about adding a few lines of code to a computer program, without any of the rebellion implied by the scene. The swaggering Kirk started to appear in the later second season and was more common by the third, as Shatner played him with much more bombast. Even the Kirk in TMP has that swagger in scenes, and the notion of him swiping command out from under Decker's feet suggest he will go around the rules if necessary, even if technically he is playing within them. The odd thing is that the more respectful, first-season Kirk is reflected in the animated series, which seems to take place after the episodes of the live show.
 
People on this board talk about Kirk's womanizing patterns as if it were a myth. I disagree. Consider the number of significant past love interests of his that we saw (or heard mention of), just within the series (in no particular order):

1. Janice Lester -- Turnabout Intruder
2. Ruth (unknown last name) -- Shore Leave
3. Areel Shaw -- Court Marshall
4. Janet Wallace -- The Deadly Years
5. The Blonde lab technician he almost married (who may or may not have been Carol Marcus) -- Where No Man has Gone Before
6. Count Carol Marcus separately here, in case she's *not* the blonde lab technician from #5

This list isn't even counting the women he meets and falls in love with in the space of a single episode (examples being Rayna, or Edith Keeler). Or the women he was "involved" with when he wasn't himself (Miramanee, Janice Rand. Granted Rand wasn't consensual so she probably shouldn't be counted here.).

For respectability purposes, I specifically don't count the women he was "using" for a larger purpose, such as Marlena Moreau or Sylvia.

A list like that, how can you say that Kirk was *not* a womanizer? True he never schlepped anybody green, but that's beside the point here, I think.
 
Last edited:
While TWOK's aspirations were never as lofty as TMP, I never thought of the film as being middle of the road or nonsensical. From an emotional standpoint, it's the only mature film in the series, as Kirk and company have to face some of the very same real issues that people in the audience face, as opposed to the trumped up "fate of the galaxy" or "coming to terms with my human/vulcan/robot limitations" sorts of emotions the other films offer. It's the only film that really humanizes the characters in a way that is understandable to many.

I question the assumption that ordinariness is equivalent to maturity. Just because a theme is conveyed allegorically rather than in a literal and overt way, that doesn't make it childish. It may look that way to the casual observer, but that's just the protective camouflage that writers like Serling and Roddenberry used to cloak their adult or subversive messages in a form that network censors would mistake for superficial kid stuff.

There are certainly other Trek films in which characters deal with real, human issues. In TMP, Kirk had to overcome his own ego and desire for control in order to become a more effective leader, and Spock came to a life-changing epiphany about the error of denying the value of his emotions. TSFS was about the willingness to sacrifice for the sake of a loved on. TVH was a statement about conservation, part of a movement that's had a positive impact on the real world, since humpback whales are no longer endangered. TUC was an allegory for the end of the Cold War and the importance of setting aside old fears and enmities in order to move forward. GEN was about facing mortality and loss, just as much as TWOK was. And so on.


TWOK works as both a popcorn movie, with the space battles, and as an attempt to actually have a drama, with ideas and themes never really dealt with in ST, let alone space opera in general. Aging, failed relationships, "accidental" children, and the like. In 1982, this was practically unheard of in science fiction.

Rare in mass-media science fiction, perhaps, but mass-media SF has never been more but a fraction of the genre as a whole, and has generally been much more limited and superficial than prose science fiction. Generally the state of the art in mass-media SF is 20 years behind what's in the literature. Although TOS was ahead of the usual curve because it had participation from some of the top prose-SF authors of the era, like Matheson, Sturgeon, Spinrad, and Ellison -- writers who were taking SF in more sophisticated, literary directions at a time when most mass-media SF was still rehashing the tropes of pulp magazines from decades earlier.


What so many people found off-putting about it was not just the slow pacing but the fact that no one really behaved very much like any person they knew.

That reaction has always puzzled me. The whole point of the story was that the characters had been apart for years and had lost their way, and needed to find themselves again. Acting out of character was part of the story, the problem they needed to overcome. Which only reaffirmed their relationships, because it showed they aren't really complete or at their best except when they're together.


I don't know that TWOK is where the idea of the renegade Kirk surfaced. For starters, there's nothing concrete that says he was such. We get Carol's "never a boy scout" line and McCoy's informing Saavik that Kirk beat the no-one scenario. Then Kirk acknowledges that he reprogrammed the simulator. That could be taken as Kirk nodding to his rebellious youth, or we could just as easily have a wisftul 50-something Kirk simply reminiscing about adding a few lines of code to a computer program, without any of the rebellion implied by the scene.

Yes, as I said, it was really more TSFS that established the "renegade" idea by having him steal the ship. By itself, the Kobayashi Maru anecdote could simply be a youthful indiscretion; it took the subsequent movie to establish that it might be part of a pattern.


The swaggering Kirk started to appear in the later second season and was more common by the third, as Shatner played him with much more bombast. Even the Kirk in TMP has that swagger in scenes, and the notion of him swiping command out from under Decker's feet suggest he will go around the rules if necessary, even if technically he is playing within them. The odd thing is that the more respectful, first-season Kirk is reflected in the animated series, which seems to take place after the episodes of the live show.

I don't see how swagger or bombast is evidence of breaking the rules. Captain Styles in TSFS was so full of swagger that he literally carried a swagger stick, but he was also clearly a stickler for the rules and a symbol of the authority that Kirk was defying. (Indeed, the swagger stick is traditionally a symbol of authority in the military.) Swagger and bombast, as a rule, are more often associated with the authority figures that anti-authority heroes are pitted against.


People on this board talk about Kirk's womanizing patterns as if it were a myth. I disagree. Consider the number of significant past love interests of his that we saw (or heard mention of), just within the series (in no particular order):

1. Janice Lester -- Turnabout Intruder
2. Ruth (unknown last name) -- Shore Leave
3. Areel Shaw -- Court Marshall
4. Janet Wallace -- The Deadly Years
5. The Blonde lab technician he almost married (who may or may not have been Carol Marcus) -- Where No Man has Gone Before
6. Count Carol Marcus separately here, in case she's *not* the blonde lab technician from #5

This list isn't even counting the women he meets and falls in love with in the space of a single episode (examples being Rayna, or Edith Keeler). Or the women he was "involved" with when he wasn't himself (Miramanee, Janice Rand. Granted Rand wasn't consensual so she probably shouldn't be counted here.).

All of which is par for the course for TV heroes in the 1960s-80s. Even a sensitive guy like MacGyver had a similarly huge number of old flames and love interests of the week, because that's just how episodic TV works. Kirk was downright chaste compared to someone like Napoleon Solo or Jim West.

Heck, look at The Six Million Dollar Man. The great love of Steve Austin's life was Jaime Sommers, right? But Jaime was actually the second old flame introduced in the second season; just six episodes earlier, we'd met another "Lost Love" (the episode title) whom he'd proposed marriage to but who'd turned him down because she didn't want to compete with his astronaut training. She was never heard from again and totally forgotten by the time Jaime rolled around. Steve has another romance three episodes after "Lost Love," and seduces a woman during an undercover job in the episode after that. Then the 2-parter "The Bionic Woman" comes along, and Steve and Jaime are about to get married, but then she dies (temporarily), and yet Steve has another romance in the very next episode!

So yeah, Kirk had a lot of romantic interests, but that doesn't make him a womanizer (in the sense of a man who aggressively pursues superficial sexual conquests), it just makes him the lead character of an episodic television show. A TV hero can be deeply sensitive and sincere and devoted to his romantic interest in a given episode, cherish her as the greatest love of his life, and then have that entire relationship erased from memory in the very next episode because that's how TV storytelling worked in those days, with each episode being its own distinct reality that only occasionally acknowledged the existence of other episodes.


True he never schlepped anybody green, but that's beside the point here, I think.

I think you mean "shtupped." To schlep is to carry a difficult burden.


...TOS's fan base consisted predominantly of women...
What are you basing that assertion on?

Nonfiction books and articles by members of first-generation Trek fandom such as Bjo Trimble, Joan Winston, Sondra Marshak & Myrna Culbreath, etc. Actually I may have misspoken; the fanbase as a whole may have been about equally male and female, but it was the female fans such as Trimble and Winston who were the most vocal and active in organizing the first conventions and publishing the first fanzines. The overwhelming majority of fanfic authors in first-generation Trek fandom were female; the first volume of Bantam's The New Voyages fanfic anthology doesn't include a single story by a male contributor. And of course first-generation fandom produced women who have remained important to the Trek community to this day, such as Paula Block and Margaret Clark.
 
So yeah, Kirk had a lot of romantic interests, but that doesn't make him a womanizer (in the sense of a man who aggressively pursues superficial sexual conquests), it just makes him the lead character of an episodic television show. A TV hero can be deeply sensitive and sincere and devoted to his romantic interest in a given episode, cherish her as the greatest love of his life, and then have that entire relationship erased from memory in the very next episode because that's how TV storytelling worked in those days, with each episode being its own distinct reality that only occasionally acknowledged the existence of other episodes.
I agree that sometimes in a 1 hour show its expedient to have an old love appear so you don't have to explain everything and have Kirk stupidly fall in love in 4 hours (with a deadly crisis on) like he did in "Requiem for Methuselah".
However its not the old girlfriends that make me consider Kirk a womaniser. Its that he uses his sexuality (to various levels of success) to seduce Alien Princesses, to pick up Miranda in "Is There in Truth No beauty", is spoken of by the Admirals secretary in "The Menagerie". But its not every episode, not every woman but its quite a lot.

...TOS's fan base consisted predominantly of women...
What are you basing that assertion on?

Nonfiction books and articles by members of first-generation Trek fandom such as Bjo Trimble, Joan Winston, Sondra Marshak & Myrna Culbreath, etc. Actually I may have misspoken; the fanbase as a whole may have been about equally male and female, but it was the female fans such as Trimble and Winston who were the most vocal and active in organizing the first conventions and publishing the first fanzines. The overwhelming majority of fanfic authors in first-generation Trek fandom were female; the first volume of Bantam's The New Voyages fanfic anthology doesn't include a single story by a male contributor. And of course first-generation fandom produced women who have remained important to the Trek community to this day, such as Paula Block and Margaret Clark.

Its funny that on this TOS board I see 99% men and on another board I used to frequent it might have been 75% men.
Yet when I went to a special screening of the HD Menagerie a couple of years ago there were about 90% women in attendance.
Am I being sexist to suggest that women are more likely to organise fandom and write fanfic while men are more likely to go online?
I wonder if anyone knows, I'm sure Paramount and CBS would be interested in the ratio. Maybe the Facebook fans are more of a real-life indication.
 
David Gerrold's 1973 edition of The World of Star Trek identifies the pilot as "The Cage" on page 130. That's probably where using the pre-production title originates. Although I am not 100% sure.

But since the Compendium was a reference book and used that title in its formal episode guide, I think that codified the usage. I'm not saying it was never used before then, but it became consistently used after then. And of course it was the home video release under that title that locked it in for good, much as the DVD releases codified the usages of The Original Series and The Animated Series as subtitles to the two shows originally entitled Star Trek.

The World of Star Trek also has an episode guide, which is where the first pilot is identified as "The Cage." How did the Star Trek Companion identity the episode?
 
I agree that sometimes in a 1 hour show its expedient to have an old love appear so you don't have to explain everything and have Kirk stupidly fall in love in 4 hours (with a deadly crisis on) like he did in "Requiem for Methuselah".

I do wish someone during the production of that episode had had the presence of mind to go through that script and replace "four hours" with "four days." It would've worked so much better.


However its not the old girlfriends that make me consider Kirk a womaniser. Its that he uses his sexuality (to various levels of success) to seduce Alien Princesses, to pick up Miranda in "Is There in Truth No beauty", is spoken of by the Admirals secretary in "The Menagerie". But its not every episode, not every woman but its quite a lot.

As with most things in life, it's not a black-and-white question but a matter of degree. The point is not that he never pursued women at all -- the point is that the extent to which he did so has been exaggerated to the point of caricature, and many things that were not examples of womanizing have been mistaken as such because of the stereotype -- e.g. some fans believing that Kirk really had a fling with Helen Noel when it was actually a fantasy sequence, or believing that Kirk pursued Lenore Karidian just for the sake of pursuing her rather than as a calculated stratagem. Yes, he had the kind of recurring romantic entanglements that were impossible for a television protagonist of the era to avoid having -- it was routine practice for networks to insist that male leads not have steady love interests so that they'd be free to have flings with guest actresses of the week -- but that doesn't mean he was some shallow Lothario who was obsessively seducing every woman he saw. If anything, by the standards of TV heroes of his era, he treated women with an unusual degree of respect and caring. Kirk was a feminist's dream in comparison to a misogynistic wolf like Napoleon Solo.


Its funny that on this TOS board I see 99% men and on another board I used to frequent it might have been 75% men.
Yet when I went to a special screening of the HD Menagerie a couple of years ago there were about 90% women in attendance.
Am I being sexist to suggest that women are more likely to organise fandom and write fanfic while men are more likely to go online?

It's more of a generational shift, I think. TOS attracted male and female fans about equally and inspired great passion in the female fans, but once TNG and the others came along, they brought in a fanbase that was predominantly male. And it's the writers too. In the '70s and '80s, there were a lot of fan-turned-pro female writers doing Trek novels -- Marshak & Culbreath, Kathleen Sky, Sonni Cooper, A.C. Crispin, Diane Duane, Melinda Snodgrass, Jean Lorrah, Janet Kagan, Della Van Hise, Margaret Wander Bonanno, Barbara Hambly, Majliss Larson, J.M. Dillard, Diane Carey, Carmen Carter -- but in recent years, the stable of Trek novelists is mostly male aside from Kirsten Beyer and Una McCormack. There were some others we don't hear from much anymore, like Judith Reeves-Stevens, Christie Golden, and Heather Jarman, but the ratio has definitely shifted more toward males since the TNG era.



The World of Star Trek also has an episode guide, which is where the first pilot is identified as "The Cage."

But it doesn't have an actual entry for the pilot as a separate episode. It just has an entry for "The Menagerie" with a footnote saying that it was adapted from a pilot called "The Cage." The Compendium was the first reference work to actually list the pilot as a separate entity from the 2-parter, to have both an entry for "The Cage" as a self-contained pilot episode and an entry for "The Menagerie" later in the book.

Besides, World's episode list was just a minor part of a book that was about other stuff. The Compendium was an encyclopedic work that, for many, would've been seen as the definitive episode guide. It was the book that other works would likely refer to when they wanted to make lists. So it would've been more influential. It was clearly influential, because it was the first reference work to list the episodes in production order rather than airdate order, and that became the standard practice in all reference works, syndication runs, and home video releases in subsequent years, until the DVD box sets inexplicably reverted to airdate order.


How did the Star Trek Companion identity the episode?

I'm not aware of a book by that name. If you mean Bjo Trimble's Concordance, it had no separate listing for the pilot, only for the 2-parter "The Menagerie," and no behind-the-scenes discussion of that episode's origins.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top