Who Came First? - Female or Male?

[thestrangequark]

Yeah, but is it the milk that's gay or the cows?

 

[Silvercrest]

I thought Milk was openly gay while in office. BTW, do you think his killer should have used the Twinkie defense?

What?

 

[Gov Kodos]

Since that broad band of stars is 'The Milky Way' and milk comes from cows is the galaxy then gay? Are The Village People just the first step in an alien takeover?

 

[thestrangequark]

^Based on the information that I have studied, the whole universe is gay.

Thank god.

 

[Starbrow]

Based on the information that I have studied all of the information points to the fact that humans might have come from another planet which means that other forms of life would be present in the Universe if humans did in fact come from another planet.

If not then based on biology and the relative nature of what is testable...females are the ones who came first and then gave birth to male. Not because of a need for companionship but most likely for the reason that a split occurred based on a cellular mutation that took place.

There is only one pair of sex chromosomes. XX for female and XY for a male.

If the male chromosome was so different and in fact did not come from a female first then the male would never have an X as part of its chromosome makeup which coms from the female.

Male has XY (heterogametic)and female has XX (homogametic).

It's also interesting how most species of primordial humans are called Homo such as Homosapien which means that first the woman came into being and then each generation of male such as the sapiens came after her carrying her specific gene traits.

Male looks like an alternat version of a Female.

Could Male be a result of an experiment conducted on early Homosapiens?

If Males didn't excisted, then females could self reproduce - they got all the things needed for it.

 

[Silvercrest]

Yes, an experiment conducted on homo sapiens explains why the rest of the animal kingdom was male and female hundreds of millions of years earlier.

 

[scotpens]

Yes, an experiment conducted on homo sapiens explains why the rest of the animal kingdom was male and female hundreds of millions of years earlier.

Finally someone who spells Homo sapiens correctly -- except that the genus is always capitalized.

There's no such thing as a "homosapien," dammit!

 

[sojourner]

Homosapien?

[yt]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2HwmO_GZfzI[/yt]

 

[Starbrow]

Yes, an experiment conducted on homo sapiens explains why the rest of the animal kingdom was male and female hundreds of millions of years earlier.

Current animal kingdom are just leaves on a tree.

If you experiment on only 1 species, and it failes, you would waste presures time ( Dinosaur era ). You need as many test subjects as possible to get the best results.

 

[sojourner]

Yes, an experiment conducted on homo sapiens explains why the rest of the animal kingdom was male and female hundreds of millions of years earlier.

Current animal kingdom are just leaves on a tree.

If you experiment on only 1 species, and it failes, you would waste presures time ( Dinosaur era ). You need as many test subjects as possible to get the best results.

So are you saying that someone experimented on every animal species on the planet at the same time for the same result?

You should join Dryson and read a book or two before posting again.

 

[Starbrow]

Yes, an experiment conducted on homo sapiens explains why the rest of the animal kingdom was male and female hundreds of millions of years earlier.

Current animal kingdom are just leaves on a tree.

If you experiment on only 1 species, and it failes, you would waste presures time ( Dinosaur era ). You need as many test subjects as possible to get the best results.

So are you saying that someone experimented on every animal species on the planet at the same time for the same result?

You should join Dryson and read a book or two before posting again.

Y chromosome in Humans is to weak to have evolved on it's own. It had help, else why would it be loosing all of it's genes?

 

[Nerys Myk]

Source?

 

[thestrangequark]

It is cool that you're interested in genetics and evolution, Starbrow, but (and I don't mean this as an insult, just a statement) you don't seem to have even a foundational understanding of the concepts of evolution, genetics, or biology. Maybe best to check out a few books and learn what is known before wildly guessing.

 

[Gov Kodos]

Maybe best to check out a few books and learn what is known before wildly guessing.

On the Internet? Outrageous!

 

[Starbrow]

X chromosome can create a Female with you Y chromosome genes.
Y chromosome can't create a Male with out X chromosome genes.
This is why Females are the original. While Males are an abnomality that can't exist with out Female. Hence there is no balance in this " natural " evolution, that's why it wasn't natural from the begining.
By deleting the genes from Y chromosome, and rewriting the missing on to X chromosome, the nature is slowy reversing us back to the original design: Humans as Asexual Females.

 

[Gov Kodos]

I knew I was a lesbian at heart!

 

[CorporalCaptain]

I knew I was a lesbian at heart!

Am I a lesbian trapped in a man's body?

 

[Gov Kodos]

I knew I was a lesbian at heart!

Am I a lesbian trapped in a man's body?

Yes.

 

[thestrangequark]

X chromosome can create a Female with you Y chromosome genes.
Y chromosome can't create a Male with out X chromosome genes.
This is why Females are the original. While Males are an abnomality that can't exist with out Female. Hence there is no balance in this " natural " evolution, that's why it wasn't natural from the begining.
By deleting the genes from Y chromosome, and rewriting the missing on to X chromosome, the nature is slowy reversing us back to the original design: Humans as Asexual Females.

Are you just making stuff up? Like, seriously, where are you getting this from?

 

[BeatleJWOL]

Ah, he's a Voyager fan.

That explains it.



*hides*

(p.s. look at post history. we are clearly being had.)