A lot of folks on this site have signatures that can be seen with every post made. Question: has you sig ever drawn any or more attention than an occasional remark whether positive or negative.
Some years ago I had a sig that read: Star Trek: 1964-1979. Let's get back to space adventure, strange new worlds and the final frontier. Contemporary Trek has failed. Or something like that. It drew me a lot of flak in discussions, particularly that last part I think which was often thrown back at me as having a closed mind to anything new.
I stuck to my guns for quite awhile, but eventually dropped the last sentence. Sometime later I dropped the rest except for the Star Trek: 1964-1979 part. And for awhile now I've had the sig you can see at the bottom of this post.
So has your sig ever drawn any unusual attention? And maybe you can share the thinking behind your choice of signature. Note it doesn't have to be Trek related.
Some years ago I had a sig that read: Star Trek: 1964-1979. Let's get back to space adventure, strange new worlds and the final frontier. Contemporary Trek has failed. Or something like that. It drew me a lot of flak in discussions, particularly that last part I think which was often thrown back at me as having a closed mind to anything new.
I stuck to my guns for quite awhile, but eventually dropped the last sentence. Sometime later I dropped the rest except for the Star Trek: 1964-1979 part. And for awhile now I've had the sig you can see at the bottom of this post.
So has your sig ever drawn any unusual attention? And maybe you can share the thinking behind your choice of signature. Note it doesn't have to be Trek related.