"...Your last so-called World War."

Discussion in 'Star Trek - The Original & Animated Series' started by JonnyQuest037, Aug 22, 2019.

?

Was World War III the same thing as the Eugenics Wars?

  1. Yes

    12 vote(s)
    41.4%
  2. No

    17 vote(s)
    58.6%
  1. MAGolding

    MAGolding Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2015
    Let us remember what is actually said.

    The Eugenics Wars did not happen from 1992 to 1996. The only statement about the era of the Eugenics Wars is:

    This indicates that probably the entire "last world war"/Eugenics Wars happened during a longer or shorter part of the mid-1990s. The mid 1990s would be roughly the period from 1993.333 to 1966.666 - in the calendar used in "Space Seed".

    So the Eugenics Wars should have lasted for minutes, or hours, or days, or weeks, or months, or years, and were probably entirely within the period of 1993.333 to 1996.666 SS ("Space Seed" calendar). But it is possible that the earliest parts of the Eugenics Wars were before 1993.333 SS and/or the latest parts of the Eugenics Wars were after 1996.666 SS.

    What did happen from 1992 to 1996 was the reign of Khan "Midnightian" Singh, as I like to call him.

    More than a quarter of Earth should mean either more than a quarter of Earth's entire surface, land and sea, or else over a quarter of the entire surface area of Earth, or over a quarter of the total human population of Earth. It is not specified how Khan acquired rule over more than one of the nations that existed in our timeline when the script was written. It isn't stated whether Khan gained power in one huge country or many small countries in the Star Trek universe, whether violently or peacefully, legally or illegally.

    So over forty countries were seized by young supermen in coups in 1993. More than a quarter of the Earth (Khan's realm) plus more than forty nations should add up to a large proportion of the total Earth ruled by those supermen.

    And apparently they eventually began to attack each other.

    After Khan was identified:

    So apparently Khan didn't attack any other countries during his rule, and so became, by unspecified methods, the ruler of a vast preexisting country or empire in 1992 instead of conquering a bunch of countries over several years until 1992. Khan was attacked by other powers, maybe countries ruled by other supermen, or countries not ruled by supermen, or by rebels, or by a combination, and was the last of the tyrants to be overthrown.

    At the dinner:

    So apparently there was a struggle against the supermen dictators as well as struggles among them.

    So the superior ambition of the supermen is the reason why some of them attacked Khan. And note that when the wars were over the surviving normal humans apparently believed that all of the augments were dead. Every super man, super woman, and super child among them. This indicates that the war to end tyranny was also a war to exterminate all tyrants and potential tyrants.

    In TNG "A Matter of Time" Picard said:

    So Picard compares Khan to Hitler. I doubt if Kirk & would have remembered good things about Khan if they thought Khan was as evil as Hitler. So apparently the opinions about Khan have changed in about 90 years between TOS and TNG, and something which Khan did is now considered in the era of TNG to be much more evil than Kirk & Co. considered it to be in the era of TOS.

    This sounds like ICBMs with nuclear warheads were used and that entire countries were devastated. Possibly entire tiny countries like Antiqua and Barbuda, or Andorra, or Singapore, or maybe entire vast countries like the USA, Brazil, Russia, China, India, etc. Total casualties could have been millions, tens of millions, hundreds of millions, or billions.

    And I can imagine that possibly Khan detected missiles heading toward his realm - Khantopia, or Khanistan, or whatever it was called - and pushed the button to retaliate with missiles of his own. And perhaps Picard, unlike Kirk & Co., can't forgive Khan for doing so.

    There is evidence about which wars were on the list of Earth's world wars which Spock studied (possibly in some Why Humans are Inferior class on Vulcan):

    In "City on the Edge of Forever":

    So the Second World War in Kirk's history books is similar to the one in our history. But possibly different:

    This suggests to me that in the alternate universe of Star Trek some evil time traveler or alien went to Germany in the early 1930s and convinced the Nazi leadership before they even came to rule Germany (and possibly separately convinced the leaders of the German armed forces) that atomic weapons carried by shorter range missiles and even ICBMS were necessary for Germany to win the next war, probably using a lot of future evidence and/or alien technology to convince them. Or maybe using some sort of mind control.

    So the Germans atomic bomb and missile programs would then work together to build atomic bombs that would fit on their rockets, and rockets powerful enough to carry the bombs to distant continents, unlike as in our alternate universe. And the time traveling or alien person or persons who interfered with Earth history in the alternate universe of Star Trek must have changed the way the Nazis did things.

    In Patterns of Force":

    So in the alternate universe of Star Trek Nazi Germany is known by historians to have been a highly efficient state, unlike in our alternate universe where Nazi Germany is known by historians to have been very inefficient, which helped prevent a Nazi victory in Would war II in our timeline.

    In "Bread and Circuses" a partial list of world wars from Earth history is given:

    The First World War in this list should be roughly equivalent to our World War I, the Second World War in this list should be roughly equivalent to our World War II (it was identified with it by Kirk in "City on the Edge of Forever"), and the Third World War in this list would be sometime after World War II and it is entirely unspecified who fought against who where and why.

    Note that Spock says that only "six" million died in their version of World War I, "only" eleven million died in their version of World War II, and "only" thirty seven million died in their version of World War III.

    Note that about nine to eleven million military personnel died in our World War I with about eight million civilians, thus making our deaths about 1.5, 1.8333, 2.8333, or 3.1666 times as many as in the alternate universe of Star Trek. So I deduce the World War I in the alternate universe of Star Trek was much smaller than in our universe.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_I_casualties

    Note that about fifty to fifty six million people, military and civilian, were killed in our World War II with about nineteen to twenty eight million more deaths from war-related famine and disease for a total of about sixty nine to eighty four million, or else fifty to fifty five million civilian deaths plus twenty one to twenty five million military deaths for a total of about seventy one to eighty million deaths. These figures make our deaths about 6.2727, 6.4545, 7.2727, or 7.6363 times as many as the "mere" eleven million in the alternate universe of Star Trek. So I deduce the World War II in the alternate universe of Star Trek was much smaller than in our universe.

    And it seems to me that in the 1960s when "Bread and Circuses" was written, people feared that World War III might cause many times as many as the "mere" thirty seven million deaths in the World War III in the alternate universe of Star Trek, and possibly happened earlier than the late 1960s, possibly so early that there were far fewer weapons of mass destruction available and far fewer deaths than would have happened in the 1960s.

    Was the World War III of "Bread and Circuses" Earth's last world war? Spock did mention "your first three world wars", strongly implying there has been at least one more by their time. And in "Space Seed":

    One possibility is:

    1) Star Trek's First World War happens close to the time of our First World War, but is much smaller.
    2) Star Trek's Second World War happens close to the time of our Second World War, but is much smaller.
    3) Star Trek's Third World War happens some time after the Second World War, and is also known as the Eugenics Wars. Whole populations are bombed out of existence, but those are the populations of relatively small countries, so the total fatalities are "only" thirty seven million. This happens in the 1990s of the "Space Seed" calendar, and is Earth's last world war.

    Another possibility is:

    1) Star Trek's First World War happens close to the time of our First World War, but is much smaller.
    2) Star Trek's Second World War happens close to the time of our Second World War, but is much smaller.
    3) Star Trek's Third World War happens some time after the Second World War, - the who, what, when, where, why, and how are almost totally unknown. The total fatalities are thirty seven million.
    4) Star Trek's Fourth World War happens some time after the Third World War, and is also known as the Eugenics Wars. Whole populations are bombed out of existence, so the total fatalities may be millions, tens of millions, hundreds of millions, or even billions. This happens in the 1990s of the "Space Seed" calendar, and is Earth's last world war.

    Another possibility is:

    1) Star Trek's First World War happens close to the time of our First World War, but is much smaller.
    2) Star Trek's Second World War happens close to the time of our Second World War, but is much smaller.
    3) Star Trek's Third World War happens some time after the Second World War, - the who, what, when, where, why, and how are almost totally unknown. The total fatalities are thirty seven million.
    4) One or more other world wars happen after Star Trek's Third World War and before Star Trek's "Latest" World War. Nothing is known about them.
    5?) Star Trek's "Latest" World War, numbered as the Fifth World War or higher, happens some time after the earlier World Wars, and is also known as the Eugenics Wars. Whole populations are bombed out of existence, so the total fatalities may be millions, tens of millions, hundreds of millions, or even billions. This happens in the 1990s of the "Space Seed" calendar, and is Earth's "latest" world war.

    These are possibilities suggested by data in in TOS.

    Continued:in post number 42:
     
    Last edited: Aug 28, 2019
  2. MAGolding

    MAGolding Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2015
    Post number 41 continued.

    But in Star Trek: First Contact the Enterprise follows a Borg ship back in time to Earth:

    And a minute later:

    So the date of this Third World war would have been about 2053 in the calendar used in Star Trek: First Contact, or 2053 FC.

    When the Borg ship fires at the missile complex:

    And later:

    This additional data suggests a different list of Earth's world wars:

    One possibility is:

    1) Star Trek's First World War happens close to the time of our First World War, but is much smaller.
    2) Star Trek's Second World War happens close to the time of our Second World War, but is much smaller.
    3) Star Trek's Third World War happens some time after the Second World War, and is also known as the Eugenics Wars. Whole populations are bombed out of existence, but those are the populations of relatively small countries, so the total deaths are only thirty seven million. This happens in the 1990s of the "Space Seed" calendar, and is Earth's last world war.
    4) TNG's Third World War happens about 2053 in the calendar used in First Contact. One of the factions involved is the Eastern Coalition, and apparently the USA is attacked during the war. Six hundred million are killed. This is called only the Third World War because some of the previous world wars are no longer named world wars or one or more conflicts previously considered separate world wars are now considered part of a single world war.

    Another possibility is:

    1) Star Trek's First World War happens close to the time of our First World War, but is much smaller.
    2) Star Trek's Second World War happens close to the time of our Second World War, but is much smaller.
    3) Star Trek's Third World War happens some time after the Second World War, - the who, what, when, where, why, and how are almost totally unknown. The total fatalities are thirty seven million.
    4) Star Trek's Fourth World War happens some time after the Third World War, and is also known as the Eugenics Wars. Whole populations are bombed out of existence, so the total fatalities may be millions, tens of millions, hundreds of millions, or even billions. This happens in the 1990s of the "Space Seed" calendar, and is Earth's last world war.
    5) TNG's Third World War happens about 2053 in the calendar used in First Contact. One of the factions involved is the Eastern Coalition, and apparently the USA is attacked during the war. Six hundred million are killed. This is called only the Third World War because some of the previous world wars are no longer named world wars or one or more conflicts previously considered separate world wars are now considered part of a single world war.

    Another possibility is:

    1) Star Trek's First World War happens close to the time of our First World War, but is much smaller.
    2) Star Trek's Second World War happens close to the time of our Second World War, but is much smaller.
    3) Star Trek's Third World War happens some time after the Second World War, - the who, what, when, where, why, and how are almost totally unknown. The total fatalities are thirty seven million.
    4) One or more other world wars happen after Star Trek's Third World War and before Star Trek's "Latest" World War. Nothing is known about them.
    5?) Star Trek's "Latest" World War, numbered as the Fifth World War or higher, happens some time after the earlier World Wars, and is also known as the Eugenics Wars. Whole populations are bombed out of existence, so the total fatalities may be millions, tens of millions, hundreds of millions, or even billions. This happens in the 1990s of the "Space Seed" calendar, and is Earth's "latest" world war.
    6?) TNG's Third World War happens about 2053 in the calendar used in Star Trek: First Contact. One of the factions involved is the Eastern Coalition, and apparently the USA is attacked during the war. Six hundred million are killed. This is called only the Third World War because some of the previous world wars are no longer named world wars or one or more conflicts previously considered separate world wars are now considered part of a single world war.

    The problem with these last three possibilities is that they have the Third World War of first contact happen after the Eugenics Wars which are supposedly Earth's last world war. Could it be that Earth had several world wars so devastating and bloody that the Third World War of Star Trek: First Contact, with about six hundred million killed, was not considered to be big enough to be a world war in the list used in the era of TOS?

    But if the same calendar is used in "Space Seed" and Star Trek: First Contact, the Third World War of Star Trek: First Contact has to be about 60 years after the Eugenics Wars. Therefore I prefer to believe that two different calendars are used in "Space Seed" and Star Trek: First Contact, with the year one in the "Space Seed" calendar being about 60 years after the year one in the Star Trek: First Contact calendar, and the Eugenics Wars being the same conflict as the Third World War in Star Trek: First Contact.

    One possibility is:

    1) Star Trek's First World War happens close to the time of our First World War, but is much smaller.
    2) Star Trek's Second World War happens close to the time of our Second World War, but is much smaller.
    3) Star Trek's Third World War happens some time after the Second World War, and is also known as the Eugenics Wars. Whole populations are bombed out of existence, but those are the populations of relatively small countries, so the total deaths are only thirty seven million. This happens in the 1990s of the "Space Seed" calendar, and about 2053 in the First Contact calendar, and is Earth's last world war. This is also the same conflict as TNG's Third World War. One of the factions involved is the Eastern Coalition, and apparently the USA is attacked during the war. Six hundred million are killed.

    This list has the problem that It's Third World War has both thirty seven million deaths and six hundred million deaths, so one source says that about 16 times as many people were killed as another source says. That seems very contradictory.

    Another possibility is:

    1) Star Trek's First World War happens close to the time of our First World War, but is much smaller.
    2) Star Trek's Second World War happens close to the time of our Second World War, but is much smaller.
    3) Star Trek's Third World War happens some time after the Second World War, - the who, what, when, where, why, and how are almost totally unknown. The total fatalities are thirty seven million.
    4) Star Trek's Fourth World War happens some time after the Third World War, and is also known as the Eugenics Wars in the era of TOS, but is renamed the Third World war in the era of TNG. Whole populations are bombed out of existence, so the total fatalities may be millions, tens of millions, hundreds of millions, or even billions. This happens in the 1990s of the "Space Seed" calendar, and also in the 2050s of the First Contact calendar, and is Earth's last world war. One of the factions involved is the Eastern Coalition, and apparently the USA is attacked during the war. Six hundred million are killed. In the era of TNG this is called only the Third World War because some of the previous world wars are no longer named world wars or one or more conflicts previously considered separate world wars are now considered part of a single world war.

    Another possibility is:

    1) Star Trek's First World War happens close to the time of our First World War, but is much smaller.
    2) Star Trek's Second World War happens close to the time of our Second World War, but is much smaller.
    3) Star Trek's Third World War happens some time after the Second World War, - the who, what, when, where, why, and how are almost totally unknown. The total fatalities are thirty seven million.
    4) One or more other world wars happen after Star Trek's Third World War and before Star Trek's "Latest" World War. Nothing is known about them.
    5?) Star Trek's "Latest" World War, numbered as the Fifth World War or higher in the era of TOS, happens some time after the earlier World Wars, and is also known as the Eugenics Wars in the era of TOS, but is renamed the Third World war in the era of TNG. Whole populations are bombed out of existence in the Eugenics Wars, so the total fatalities may be millions, tens of millions, hundreds of millions, or even billions. This happens in the 1990s of the "Space Seed" calendar, and also in the 2050s of the First Contact calendar, and is Earth's last world war. One of the factions involved is the Eastern Coalition, and apparently the USA is attacked during the war. Six hundred million are killed. In the era of TNG this is called only the Third World War because some of the previous world wars are no longer named world wars or one or more conflicts previously considered separate world wars are now considered part of a single world war.

    The Third World War in Star Trek: First Contact ended about ten years before 2063, and thus about 2053 in the First Contact calendar. It might have begun in about 2053 FC or possibly earlier since it is not known how long it lasted. So Cochrane's first warp test flight and then the First Contact with aliens happens in 2063, about ten years after the end of the war, and probes using warp drive and manned ships using warp drive begin to be built and used some time later, an unspecified number of months, years, or decades later.

    Presumably the "Eugenics wars in "Space Seed" ended when the last of the tyrants, Khan, was overthrown in 1996 in the "Space Seed" calendar - year 1996 SS. And another important event is dated in "Space Seed":

    The much faster form of space travel about the year 2018 SS could be something before warp drive, but the chronology indicates that it must be the adoption of warp drive space ships.

    The year 2018 SS was 22 years after 1996 SS. If 1996 SS is equivalent to about 2053 FC, 2018 SS would be equivalent to about 2075 FC, which would be twelve years after First Contact. If Marla McGivers was speaking very vaguely like many Humans, "about the year 2018" could mean within about five years of 2018, and thus sometime between 2013 FC and 2023 FC, which would correspond to about 2070 FC to 2080 FC, seven to seventeen yeas after First Contact.

    It is possible that the first warp drive probes would be sent in 2013 SS/2070 FC and that the first manned warp ships would be launched about 2018 SS/2080 FC.

    It is also a possibility that the Eugenics Wars and the Third World war of Star Trek: First Contact were considered part of a single world war in the era of TOS but were split up into two separate world wars in the era of TNG. So in the era of TNG an unspecified war was listed as the First World War, the Eugenics Wars ending about 1996 SS were listed as the Second World War, and the war in First Contact, considered to be part of the same world war as the Eugenics wars in the era of TOS, is considered a separate, Third, World War in the era of TNG.

    So if there are a few years between the first and second parts of the last world war in TOS, the first warp drive ships could be launched a few years earlier than about 2070 FC.

    Anyway, those are my thoughts and calculations about Earth's three or more world wars in Star Trek.
     
    Last edited: Aug 28, 2019
  3. johnnybear

    johnnybear Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2014
    All this effort because a few writers in the TNG era didn't bother to do the same! I've always felt the newer writers of the later series disregarded a lot of TOS and thought of it as cheesy! So took what they viewed as the 'good stuff' and then created their own version of future history but failed to care that fans like us would be pulling our hair out trying to reconcile both works into the same chronology! :wah:
    JB
     
  4. Timo

    Timo Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2003
    Well, it really is TOS itself already not giving a shit about this: the contradictions regarding the world wars all begin there already. Was there a boss fight in the sixties or not? "Omega Glory" and "Bread and Circuses" contradict each other there. What happened? "Bread" even contradicts reality there. "Space Seed" has its own incompatible ideas, and nobody in the writing team cares. But why should they, when it's all fiction anyway?

    It's perhaps more excusable with Vulcan being conquered and never conquered at the same time: there the fiction smacks itself in the face on a matter that does not matter, since we know squat about Vulcan history to begin with. Earth history we know and care about. But the writers of TOS did not, and individually each and every one of them was entitled to that, because, well, fiction. Put together is how they achieved this "not giving a shit" status, though.

    Timo Saloniemi
     
    Spot261 likes this.
  5. Damian

    Damian Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2017
    Location:
    United States
    One big thing that happened between "Space Seed" and TNG is TWOK. It's very possible Picard was considering Khan's final actions before he died as well.

    And just mentioning the two, Hitler and Khan, in the same sentence doesn't mean they are the same kind of evil. I might use Napoleon and Mussolini in the same sentence about rulers but it doesn't necessarily mean I equate them in other ways.

    I complement you on your detailed analysis. But I think @Timo probably has it more nailed down. The original series writers probably put little if any thought into it. The writer of "Bread and Circuses" probably barely considered "Space Seed"--if they considered it at all. Before TNG came out I just assumed they were one in the same. Spock said the Eugenics Wars was the last of your so called world wars and WWIII was mentioned more explicity in "Bread and Circuses" (Spock's error in casualties not withstanding---in the real world probably the writer screwed up).

    After TNG they were split up. It's hard to know the intent early on of what they were doing. But nowadays, at least for me, in Star Trek history they are now separate conflicts. We're trying to seek perfection in the canon and continuity. But there isn't none. Spock's line in Space Seed is simply contradicted. It happens.

    As I said I am a continuity junkie. But at the same time that goes for the broad strokes. I can't try to reconcile every last detail in my mind because that level of continuity is just not possible. You'd drive yourself crazy.
     
    johnnybear and Henoch like this.
  6. Timo

    Timo Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2003
    ...Leave the fine print to me, as I'm already way beyond redemption. :devil:

    If all else fails, blame it on fallibility. Of the characters, that is. And just like LaForge is always cracking incomprehensibly bad jokes (so we can argue some of his supposedly serious if problematic utterings should count as such, too), Spock is the alien with alien views of human behavior and history (so we can argue he accidentally or intentionally uses terminology different from the accepted human one), while McCoy is the sarcastic but insightful adversary to him in debates (so he's entitled to witty hyperbole or nitpicking) and Kirk is the balancing factor (so even if he nods to some of the seeming nonsense of the other two, we need not take that as agreement with said).

    "Space Seed" is fish in a barrel in that sense, as the relevant dialogue is all repartée where a hero makes a statement and immediately gets corrected or contradicted, to no ill effect or ill will. That Spock says "your" is already cue enough that he's up to his antics, and following this with "so-called" really puts the cherry on top of what is to come.

    The rest is far from problem-free, as "Bread" gives us both a reason to believe in more than three WWs and a reason to believe that WWIII happened in the sixties, contradicting everything from "Omega Glory" to "Assignment: Earth" to every spinoff to come. But "Bread" is not trivial to dismiss. Spock is baiting McCoy all right, but he risks being contradicted on his points if those are the slightest bit off. He's not that suicidal when it comes to dueling with McCoy!

    The saving grace there is that he has an audience. Claudius is listening to every word, armed with the knowledge of who and what the Vulcans are. Spock doesn't stop being honest to a fault there, either, but seemingly undermines the whole mission by blurting out the Prime Directive obstacle to extracting Merikus. Yet Claudius is there, already in possession of all the facts. So Spock can instead be assumed to be playing games, sucking up to the boss while reinforcing the (very false) image of Vulcans as honest and impartial. And McCoy might well realize this, as he's awfully quiet about Spock's borderline-traitorious words, right until it's his turn to reinforce the "Vulcans don't lie" lie.

    But how could Merrick not know about WWIV or absence thereof? Why make such a bold lie when a lesser one would suffice (even if Claudius ultimately doesn't take the bait and start trusting Spock as a tool to be used against Kirk)? It is highly unlikely that the list of World Wars got new entries after the day Merrick last left spaceport. Even the old Columbia was fast enough for non-generational flight, and TOS and TAS and ST:FC all say humans stopped fighting humans in the 21st century already.

    Timo Saloniemi
     
  7. Henoch

    Henoch Rear Admiral Premium Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2018
    Location:
    Back On The Shelf
    A lot of long posts...short of it for me, the word "era" changes everything. What era? How long? Was it the era of the last World War (plus Eugenic Wars) in 1993-1996 that lasts 3-4 years or "era" that lasts 60 years from 1993-2053? Either way, "era" gives us time to make anything happen.
     
  8. XCV330

    XCV330 ★ Premium Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2017
    Location:
    XCV330
    Yes they did. Sometime after Voyager VI before the mars landings.

    TLDR: Yes they did.



     
  9. Maurice

    Maurice Snagglepussed Admiral

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2005
    Location:
    Real Gone
    That is the biggest WALL OF TEXT I've ever seen on this board.






    Not reading it.
     
  10. johnnybear

    johnnybear Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2014
    Spock's comments in The Omega Glory state that the earth avoided the same conflict that the Yangs and Kohms did fight, but his chat with McCoy in the cell about the three world wars in Bread And Circuses must be construed to be the Eugenics wars and that would have been obvious to all fans of TOS but for the writers and producers of TNG and the other Trek series later alterations!
    JB
     
  11. Henoch

    Henoch Rear Admiral Premium Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2018
    Location:
    Back On The Shelf
    I thought it was only biological warfare. (No nukes, Mass bombings, etc.)
     
    Marsden likes this.
  12. Timo

    Timo Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2003
    I guess it depends on the wording again.

    The parallel primarily hinges on "Asiatics" being combatants. Does it additionally hinge on the type of weapons used? A war involving "Asiatics" and "Communists" was certainly fought on Earth - dozens, in fact. And in several, "Yankees" were directly pitted against said, despite these being proxy wars. None of these involved the use of weapons of mass destruction (if we discount carpet bombings and AK-47 proliferation as such), though, meaning it might be a good idea to give significance to that aspect.

    Does it further matter what type of WMD would be used? Perhaps, if this interpretation helps us out. But only as a sub-clause to this being a West vs. East global confrontation: combat gases and, to a lesser degree, bioweapons have been used extensively in smaller conflicts ITRW, and the Trek universe need not be different there. Unless, again, we want to interpret it as being that.

    Remarkably, though, when Spock comments on the avoiding of this particular type of war, he already knows that the biological aspect to it was not particularly relevant. Unlike Tracey originally thought, it had nothing to do with the observed longevity. Spock earlier on did not hesitate to think the confrontation might have been nuclear; apparently, the telltales won't linger. So he shouldn't have a basis for declaring the local WWIII distinct from Earth's that way.

    Timo Saloniemi
     
    Last edited: Aug 29, 2019
  13. johnnybear

    johnnybear Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2014
    You could be right there, but then we didn't see anything outside of the village did we!
    JB
     
  14. Timo

    Timo Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2003
    One might assume Spock scanned the planet, at least cursorily. Nevertheless, he was ready to speculate:

    What signs of nuclear devastation would remain is one issue. Another is that "bacteriological holocaust" alone would be unlikely to utterly erase cities or road networks, even if it removed all population for thousands of years. Those ought to stand out in a cursory orbital scan already. Yet it takes Tracey and his quoting of old rumors to make Spock believe there might have been urban civilization on Omega previously. So, a bit of help from "kinetic" weapons like nukes would be a welcome addition. Or rods-of-God or whatever - the Omegans might have been more advanced than the 1960s level back when they self-annihilated.

    Timo Saloniemi
     
  15. JonnyQuest037

    JonnyQuest037 Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2005
    Location:
    Verona, New Jersey, USA
    Yeah, as soon as you start in on the years with decimal points to three places, that's when I tune out & start skimming.
    I don't know if calling someone "the best of the tyrants, and the most dangerous" can exactly be called remembering good things about somebody.

    And hell, even people who hate Hitler (i.e. anyone rational) say that he could be a mesmerizing public speaker.
    See, this is where I can't go along. I'm fine with believing that known Earth history was different in the Trek universe beyond the 1960s, but back in the 1910s? That's just a bridge too far for me.
    Yup. It was a less continuity-oriented time. No one expected transcriptions of episodes being checked against transcriptions of other episodes, or even multiple episodes being watched in quick succession the way we commonly do today.
    Yeah, I'm sure.

    But history is also a fluid thing. We likely have a greater understanding of the true casualty numbers of those wars today than we did in the mid-60s. But yeah, most likely either the writer made the numbers up on the spot or just checked a bad encyclopedia.
    I think that works great except for characters like Spock and Data, where being precise to a fault is one of their defining character traits.
    :guffaw:
     
    Damian likes this.
  16. Damian

    Damian Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2017
    Location:
    United States
    Ha-ha. True, he put waaaaaayyy to much thought into it.

    It's an interesting debate but I just can't put that much thought into it. I certainly don't think the episode writers did back during the original series.

    Honestly, even in "Bread and Circuses" the line about 'your first 3 World Wars' was relatively minor, except it revealed there was a 3rd World War at some point. I honestly don't think the writers gave any consideration to any further wars beyond that.

    As an aside I did see a pretty amusing Facebook meme "USA--back to back World War champs"---I have to admit I never really thought about it in those terms but I guess it's true to an extent
     
    BeatleJWOL and JonnyQuest037 like this.
  17. UnknownSample

    UnknownSample Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2004
    Location:
    Earth's surface
    I think retconning would be an intentional act on the part of writers or producers. This was automatic. Reality did it. We got through the 90s without a Eugenics War, therefore it didn't happen in the 90s. Really, everything's fine as long as we stay a bit blurry about the numbers.
    ----------
    And really, the very first post settled this issue. I don't know why it's still being debated.
     
    Phaser Two likes this.
  18. JonnyQuest037

    JonnyQuest037 Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2005
    Location:
    Verona, New Jersey, USA
    The writers and producers still had to make a conscious choice to move it.