Star Trek- The Motion Picture:
(Age 16) - LOVED the opening with the Klingons VS V'Ger (especially the music.) Thought this film was going to rock. Then, wtf? Pajama uniforms? Ok, times have changed, it's okay. Like the new transporter effect, wonder what it would look like when they DON'T have a transporter pad. Really, a 15 minute 1701 flyby? What was the editor thinking? Also, why do the 1701 warp nacelles look like they came from a Klingon Battle cruiser? (Then at their meeting with 'the cloud' and the first Plasma Bolt) - OMG! They've just remade "The Changeling" with a movie budget. WTF! - By the ending credits, "Yep, it was definitely "THe Changeling".
Star Trek II- The Wrath of Khan:
(Age 18): Wanted to see this film, but wasn't a fan of the "Space Seed" episode; so I thought they'd already blown it by basing a film on another already made TOS episode. Also had heard the rumor Spock was going to die in this one before seeing it on opening day (damn STRLOG magazine articles)
Opening on the 1701 Bridge - Okay, good so far but where's Kirk, something's off -- then "Okay, there's Spock dead...must be some sort of training simulation...BINGO! (So, Starlog was just making mention of the opening, which is a simulation, God, why do that kind of crap just to get notoriety? - hope the rest of the film doesn't suck.) But, by the end - Okay, there were enough continuity glitches and plotholes to pilot a Starship through, but WHO CARES!? This is what TMP should have been. I have to see it again (and I did, as I'd gone to a 10:00 AM show with friends' and went back for the 8:00 PM sho the same day and saw it again.
Star Trek III- The Search for Spock:
(Age 21) Picking up right where they left off...cool. WTF kind of Starship design is that (IE U.S.S. Excelsior). GR must be getting senile if he approved that 'flying Bathtub' as a Federation ship design. Hope it gets blown up later... Like the fact they brought Mark Leonard back as 'Sarek' and he was confronting Kirk. As to the U.S.S. Grissom 1) Again, WTF kind of starship design is that? 2) Pink Bridge upholstery...really? 3) How in the f**k did this guy make Captain? Starfleet must really be declining. Later with the Klingons on the planet and then after the whole 1701 Bridge 'countdown' and destruction. Oh, okay, the Klingons are SOOO STUPID; no wonder the Grissom had the captain it did. By the end: I guess it was okay, better than TMP, but no where near as good as STII:TWoK. Still looks like we'll get another film.
Star Trek IV- The Voyage Home
(Age 23) Really? Another "Unknown Alien Probe" causing havok? What does it take to do something more original? Then - okay, guess we'll be in the BoP for this one; that's a bit original/different. Time travel? Okay, I guess that IS the only TOS meme the films have yet to cover. Meh - after the 'comedy' that was the 'Keystone Klingons' in III; not really into another non-serious type ST film - the comedy fell flat for me. Didn't hate it, but was in no mood to really see it again.
Star Trek V- The Final Frontier:
(Age 26 - had read about and seen a Work Print to VHS transfer that we were sure was fake - it WASN'T) - Who in the f**k let Shatner write/direct this nightmare. There are elements of the original 1960ies Star Trek TV show that had BETTER visual effects and production values. God, Paramount must really want to kill off the TOS films to promote that (only in it's second season) new TNG TV series crapfest. (They reused enough of the sets and barely bothered to re-dress the Transporter Room to look different from the TNG set setup.)
Star Trek VI- The Undiscovered Country
(Age 28) - Okay, IV was preachy, but this? Again, why does Nimoy have to go on a U.S./U.S.S.R. type parallel. WTF? "Only Nixon could go to China (um yeah, ha ha - Vulcans were looking in on Earth for centuries I guess - groan) and then "Shakespeare in the original Klingon" ?? Can I have some of what Nimoy was smoking? WTF? McCoy DOESN'T know Klingon anatomy or physiology? Guess Nimoy didn't remember "Trouble With Tribbles" where McCoy outed the Klingon spy by noting teh differences after a quick tricorder scan. (Not to mention WHY they decide to beam over in the first place; OR the fact that the Klingons have only ONE medic on the ship of the Klingon Chancellor and no other med staff at all (and no, I don't buy Klingon civilization as that draconian. How the hell can they maintain a working space fleet without Engineers, Scientists, etc.) Overall, again, not really impressed. Thought it was okay.
Star Trek VII - Generations
(Age 31) My God - they gave them a feature film budget and they just redressed the sets a bit - used terrible lighting; and made a BAD, plodding, two hour TV series episode for the big screen? And WTF? If Picard can exit anywhere in time and space, why not exit at a point where he can save his nephew from a fiery death (and Picard was REALLY distraught over that at the film's start) -- or at least CONSIDER doing that? Also, why does he need Kirk? He could exit back onto the 1701-D Bridge itself and have Worf Phaser the missile from orbit without changing ANYTHING in the timeline - if that's his worry? "Best of Both Worlds" or hell the TNG Finale "All Good Things" were more Big Screen worthy then this mess. And WTF? We DON'T get Kirk either in command of a ship WITH Picard, or in Command of the 1701-D for a few minutes? Berman and Braga really DO hate TOS. What a waste of film.
Star Trek VIII - First Contact
(Age 33) Okay, they finally showed they CAN make a decent, watchable TNG feature film. That was at least somewhat entertaining, fun, and watchable (Although I hate they again decide to 'humanize' the Borg as an enemy with this 'Queen'. <--- Too bad as I liked the Borg as more of a technological 'force o nature' that couldn't really be reasoned with myself.)
Star Trek IX - Insurrection
(Age 35) Picard and Work singing something from HMS Pinafore? Seriously? WTF? Why when given a budget, do these guys again just do a BAD two hour series episode?
Star Trek X - Nemesis
(Age 39) Wow? How can you rip off "Wrath of Khan"; and do it so badly you get a film that looks nice, but SUCKS SO %$#@! hard?
Star Trek
(Age 46) Finally 'Star Trek' is back. Fun, entertaining and enjoyable again. About $#@#@! time.
Star Trek Into Darkness
(Age 50) Wow - loved it. they really did get the essence of the original Star Trek and made it entertaining again. Loved the scene with Kirk, Spock and Pike in Pike's office. Okay, it's Khan (boy is that going to piss off some die hards I'm sure.) Cool, they're kind of combining "Space Seed" and "Wrath of Khan" events for this universe - still shows WHY Khan is/was so feared, LOVED IT. (Bring on Nu-Trek III.)
(Age 16) - LOVED the opening with the Klingons VS V'Ger (especially the music.) Thought this film was going to rock. Then, wtf? Pajama uniforms? Ok, times have changed, it's okay. Like the new transporter effect, wonder what it would look like when they DON'T have a transporter pad. Really, a 15 minute 1701 flyby? What was the editor thinking? Also, why do the 1701 warp nacelles look like they came from a Klingon Battle cruiser? (Then at their meeting with 'the cloud' and the first Plasma Bolt) - OMG! They've just remade "The Changeling" with a movie budget. WTF! - By the ending credits, "Yep, it was definitely "THe Changeling".
Star Trek II- The Wrath of Khan:
(Age 18): Wanted to see this film, but wasn't a fan of the "Space Seed" episode; so I thought they'd already blown it by basing a film on another already made TOS episode. Also had heard the rumor Spock was going to die in this one before seeing it on opening day (damn STRLOG magazine articles)

Opening on the 1701 Bridge - Okay, good so far but where's Kirk, something's off -- then "Okay, there's Spock dead...must be some sort of training simulation...BINGO! (So, Starlog was just making mention of the opening, which is a simulation, God, why do that kind of crap just to get notoriety? - hope the rest of the film doesn't suck.) But, by the end - Okay, there were enough continuity glitches and plotholes to pilot a Starship through, but WHO CARES!? This is what TMP should have been. I have to see it again (and I did, as I'd gone to a 10:00 AM show with friends' and went back for the 8:00 PM sho the same day and saw it again.
Star Trek III- The Search for Spock:
(Age 21) Picking up right where they left off...cool. WTF kind of Starship design is that (IE U.S.S. Excelsior). GR must be getting senile if he approved that 'flying Bathtub' as a Federation ship design. Hope it gets blown up later... Like the fact they brought Mark Leonard back as 'Sarek' and he was confronting Kirk. As to the U.S.S. Grissom 1) Again, WTF kind of starship design is that? 2) Pink Bridge upholstery...really? 3) How in the f**k did this guy make Captain? Starfleet must really be declining. Later with the Klingons on the planet and then after the whole 1701 Bridge 'countdown' and destruction. Oh, okay, the Klingons are SOOO STUPID; no wonder the Grissom had the captain it did. By the end: I guess it was okay, better than TMP, but no where near as good as STII:TWoK. Still looks like we'll get another film.
Star Trek IV- The Voyage Home
(Age 23) Really? Another "Unknown Alien Probe" causing havok? What does it take to do something more original? Then - okay, guess we'll be in the BoP for this one; that's a bit original/different. Time travel? Okay, I guess that IS the only TOS meme the films have yet to cover. Meh - after the 'comedy' that was the 'Keystone Klingons' in III; not really into another non-serious type ST film - the comedy fell flat for me. Didn't hate it, but was in no mood to really see it again.
Star Trek V- The Final Frontier:
(Age 26 - had read about and seen a Work Print to VHS transfer that we were sure was fake - it WASN'T) - Who in the f**k let Shatner write/direct this nightmare. There are elements of the original 1960ies Star Trek TV show that had BETTER visual effects and production values. God, Paramount must really want to kill off the TOS films to promote that (only in it's second season) new TNG TV series crapfest. (They reused enough of the sets and barely bothered to re-dress the Transporter Room to look different from the TNG set setup.)
Star Trek VI- The Undiscovered Country
(Age 28) - Okay, IV was preachy, but this? Again, why does Nimoy have to go on a U.S./U.S.S.R. type parallel. WTF? "Only Nixon could go to China (um yeah, ha ha - Vulcans were looking in on Earth for centuries I guess - groan) and then "Shakespeare in the original Klingon" ?? Can I have some of what Nimoy was smoking? WTF? McCoy DOESN'T know Klingon anatomy or physiology? Guess Nimoy didn't remember "Trouble With Tribbles" where McCoy outed the Klingon spy by noting teh differences after a quick tricorder scan. (Not to mention WHY they decide to beam over in the first place; OR the fact that the Klingons have only ONE medic on the ship of the Klingon Chancellor and no other med staff at all (and no, I don't buy Klingon civilization as that draconian. How the hell can they maintain a working space fleet without Engineers, Scientists, etc.) Overall, again, not really impressed. Thought it was okay.
Star Trek VII - Generations
(Age 31) My God - they gave them a feature film budget and they just redressed the sets a bit - used terrible lighting; and made a BAD, plodding, two hour TV series episode for the big screen? And WTF? If Picard can exit anywhere in time and space, why not exit at a point where he can save his nephew from a fiery death (and Picard was REALLY distraught over that at the film's start) -- or at least CONSIDER doing that? Also, why does he need Kirk? He could exit back onto the 1701-D Bridge itself and have Worf Phaser the missile from orbit without changing ANYTHING in the timeline - if that's his worry? "Best of Both Worlds" or hell the TNG Finale "All Good Things" were more Big Screen worthy then this mess. And WTF? We DON'T get Kirk either in command of a ship WITH Picard, or in Command of the 1701-D for a few minutes? Berman and Braga really DO hate TOS. What a waste of film.
Star Trek VIII - First Contact
(Age 33) Okay, they finally showed they CAN make a decent, watchable TNG feature film. That was at least somewhat entertaining, fun, and watchable (Although I hate they again decide to 'humanize' the Borg as an enemy with this 'Queen'. <--- Too bad as I liked the Borg as more of a technological 'force o nature' that couldn't really be reasoned with myself.)
Star Trek IX - Insurrection
(Age 35) Picard and Work singing something from HMS Pinafore? Seriously? WTF? Why when given a budget, do these guys again just do a BAD two hour series episode?
Star Trek X - Nemesis
(Age 39) Wow? How can you rip off "Wrath of Khan"; and do it so badly you get a film that looks nice, but SUCKS SO %$#@! hard?
Star Trek
(Age 46) Finally 'Star Trek' is back. Fun, entertaining and enjoyable again. About $#@#@! time.
Star Trek Into Darkness
(Age 50) Wow - loved it. they really did get the essence of the original Star Trek and made it entertaining again. Loved the scene with Kirk, Spock and Pike in Pike's office. Okay, it's Khan (boy is that going to piss off some die hards I'm sure.) Cool, they're kind of combining "Space Seed" and "Wrath of Khan" events for this universe - still shows WHY Khan is/was so feared, LOVED IT. (Bring on Nu-Trek III.)