I think so. Harrison should have been an augment from Enterprise.
No, they really can't. And it's unfortunately because it ties their hands for making a movie and tell a story they want to.The people who make these movies can't win really.
Even the name / title belongs to neither India nor Sikhs.
Because, in Hollywood, there are no guarantees.Thing is, and JJ has a problem doing this.. with Star Trek and Star Wars.. is that.. they never had a plan for more movies.. He writes 1 and then, oh hey.. a 2nd one.. what are we doing? 3rd one? oh crap..
He should have had a plan for atleast 3 movies, it generally mapped out some outlines done to where they can be coheasive..
Or, if it's absolutely essential (because Reasons) to use names which are not his, the Benedict Cumberbatch Name Generator can be helpful in relieving the tedium for those less inclined to find amusement in the constant repetition of Cucumber, Cucumber, Cucumber, Cucumber.Also, is it possible to actually use Benedict Cumberbatch's name correctly?
@fireproof78 Many movies are made as a first part of a trilogy that don't make enough to get a sequal, but this is Star Trek.. Unless it totally bombs, there will be a sequal.. Even Star trek 2, 3,4 make a "trilogy" abet a loose one.Oh! Thanks M'Sharak!
yeah, I can't spell worth a damn.. should have used Benny a few times.. sorry!
In Hollywood nothing is a sure thing, so I don't blame them for not planning out.Many movies are made as a first part of a trilogy that don't make enough to get a sequal, but this is Star Trek..
For me, yes.Would TMP have been a better movie if V'Ger was called N'sa?
Agreed. Especially after the Vengeance crash, the feeling of a situation having spiralled completely out of control is spot-on. Kirk is dead, Spock's left what's left of the ship to hunt down Khan for revenge. A good chunk of San Francisco has been razed. It's pandemonium. I love it.I am watching Into Darkness right now. Benedict Cumbersnatch really is great in this movie. I may not wholly agree with the way he's portrayed but boy does he still chew the scenery in this. It may not be like montalban but his turn is easily the best villain in the kelvin films.
I still really love this movie. It is like a roller-coaster ride. There is not an ounce of slack in it. It is still the consummate blockbuster in my view, despite it's many flaws.
Would Voyager have been a better show if Tom Paris was Nick Locarno?
For me, yes.Would Voyager have been a better show if Tom Paris was Nick Locarno?
But then you would have had a section of fandom screaming 'missed opportunity' for not using on of Treks most famous bad guys in the sequel that was supposed to propel the movie franchise into $500m+ orbit. To be honest, I would have been one of them too. It's the portrayal of the character I take issue with.
I am watching Into Darkness right now. Benedict Cumbersnatch really is great in this movie. I may not wholly agree with the way he's portrayed but boy does he still chew the scenery in this. It may not be like montalban but his turn is easily the best villain in the kelvin films.
But then you would have had a section of fandom screaming 'missed opportunity' for not using on of Treks most famous bad guys in the sequel that was supposed to propel the movie franchise into $500m+ orbit.
I think that would have been a huge minority. There were TONS of trekkies that were pissed Khan was in this movie
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.