• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

World's dumbest person discovered

My 60 year old neighbour genuinely believes that the voice of Donald Duck was an actual duck that had been trained to talk.
 
My best friend once believed that we were living in the 19th century because the year started with 19 (this was in 1982). It took both my mom and his to help me convince him. Later, he also thought I was a liar when I mentioned a 2 dollar bill. He didn't believe they existed. I had to have my mom get one out of her purse and show him.
 
Wasn't there an actual case of a virgin birth during the Civil War? A young man was shot in one of his testicles and the bullet continued on and entered the womb of a young lady and a sperm on the bullet impregnated her.

Whether that is true or not it is far more believable that a 3D porn pregnancy.
 
Wasn't there an actual case of a virgin birth during the Civil War? A young man was shot in one of his testicles and the bullet continued on and entered the womb of a young lady and a sperm on the bullet impregnated her.

Whether that is true or not it is far more believable that a 3D porn pregnancy.
That has actually been busted on Mythbusters.
 
Wasn't there an actual case of a virgin birth during the Civil War? A young man was shot in one of his testicles and the bullet continued on and entered the womb of a young lady and a sperm on the bullet impregnated her.

Whether that is true or not it is far more believable that a 3D porn pregnancy.
That has actually been busted on Mythbusters.

That interesting. How did they disprove it?
 
Wasn't there an actual case of a virgin birth during the Civil War? A young man was shot in one of his testicles and the bullet continued on and entered the womb of a young lady and a sperm on the bullet impregnated her.

Whether that is true or not it is far more believable that a 3D porn pregnancy.
That has actually been busted on Mythbusters.

That interesting. How did they disprove it?

Can getting shot get you pregnant?

Myth: Young Civil War cavalryman gets shot in his tibia, the bullet ricochets through his family jewels, flies out and pierces the womb of a woman 150 yards away.
This is one of their older myths that they have tested, dating back to a 1874 write-up in American Medical Weekly.
Two parts of the myth being tested:

  1. Can a bullet ricochet like that?
  2. Could it carry the necessary genetic material?
Elements of the myth: * [minie ball bullet][mb] (likely ammunition used) * rifle with 100ft/s muzzle velocity, can hit target 900 yards away
Sidenote: the term "Son of a Gun", while dating to the same era, actually referred to a child conceived on the gun deck of a British Man of War, as the gun deck was where the sailors lived.
Experiment 1: Can the miniball pass through a leg and still have enough energy to travel the 150 yards (and pierce a belly)?

Setup: Buster given an artificial calf made of a real bones wrapped in ballistics gel and then put into a kneeling position to mimic dismounted shooting stance of a cavalryman.
Result: bullet moving >1000ft/s moving out of the leg -- it would have plenty of velocity for the myth.
Experiment 2: Can a bullet carry the genetic material? (at 200 ft)

Setup: blue-dyed sperm inside a blue trouser bag setup between gunner and petticoat-wrapped ballistics gel ("the womb"). The shot was fired by their Civil War re-enactor/expert Jim.
(First try) Adam: "Bloody hell, I think he did it." Jim made the shot perfectly on the first try (through the sperm-filled trouser bag and into the fake womb).
Could not find any sperm in the ballistics gel after examining under a microscope. Not surprising, considering that there were burns on the petticoat.
Experiment 2: Can a bullet carry the genetic material? (at 50 ft)

Still could not find any sperm in the ballistics gel
Busted
source: http://kwc.org/mythbusters/2005/03/mythbusters_son_of_a_gun_showe.html
 
I was always a bit annoyed by how the Mythbusters assume that just because they can't make something happen means it's impossible.
 
I think improbable is probably a better word for a lot of the myths they bust.

That being said, I still can't believe this is a real article. Has anyone found anything to back this up as true?
 
I work with a girl who, when I got in a few hours after her, had found a "To Do" list on a little white board from our boss. Girl had obviously been studying this carefully, but on my arrival, greeted me with huge scared eyes and said "I've found a To Do list and I don't know what to do with it.
I carefully explained that it was probably a list of things for us 'to do' ~ if I'd had a camera at hand I swear you would have seen the lightbulb light up above her head :scream:
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top