• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

World Premiere/Advance screening discussions [SPOILERS GUARANTEED]

Re: Dark Horizons movie Review it's out.

Seems like Star Trek: The motion Picture all over again.
 
Re: Dark Horizons movie Review it's out.

Ugg. I still have really high hopes, but frankly, it sounds like star trek is just another stupid action movie. I don't care how intense it is, visual effects do not impress me. I want story and drama and humanism.

I am sick of badguys. Lets kill Khan Klones and be done with it.
 
Re: Dark Horizons movie Review it's out.

I love "2001." It was quite a bit better received by the larger audience than ST:TMP, though it certainly was not the "feel-good, crowd-pleasing movie" of its year either. :lol:
 
Re: Dark Horizons movie Review it's out.

TMP focused on Trek's science fiction at the exclusion of it's fun space adventure... ST09 seems to be doing the opposite.

I am prepared to enjoy both.
 
Re: Dark Horizons movie Review it's out.

It's about what I expected.

I expected it to be brainless but I was hoping they'd do that well. Sounds like they have. Disappointing? Yeah. But....nowhere near as bad as I feared. I'll just pretend I'm going to watch something like Transformers and it sounds like I'll be well taken care of in that regard.
 
Re: Dark Horizons movie Review it's out.

I'm a tad concerned about Nero now but I completely take his point that now that this film is out the way, the sequel could be a Dark Knight.

What's funny is months ago, Bana actually called his part a cameo.

I just wish we (fans and producers) could move away from this whole "out-Khaning Khan" thing. It's become "The Villain of the Week."

The mistake this time is not that Nero isn't as badass or intellectually deep as Khan. The mistake seems to be that not enough attention was paid to him in the first place. Unlike Khan, Nero was an ordinary guy. No blood on his hands. Given what's happened to him, why shouldn't we be allowed to feel some sympathy for this guy? And, why can't he listen to reason? What about any conflicted feelings? After all, if the comic book set-up holds, the Romulans are as culpable for their destruction as Vulcan or the Federation. Maybe moreso. Perhaps the last planet he should destroy is Romulus.
But instead, it seems we get the galactic equivalent of someone going on a mindless shooting spree.

I'd like to see something different in the next movie. An antagonist more like Trelane in spirit. Or Harry Mudd. Or, conflict along the lines of "The Alternative Factor" or "The Immunity Syndrome". Even conflict like TVH or TMP. There has to be more out there than scenery-chewing, Shakespeare quoting, misplaced genius evil-doers, or good guys gone bad to vex our heroes.

If this movie can re-open the whole space-opera genre, then let's see Abrams use Trek to explore its possibilities to its fullest. That would be my hope.


I have news for you, STII has several interesting themes, but Khan's character was not "intellectually deep" by any stretch of the imagination. The success of Khan in that movie had a lot to do with Montalban's performance, and not the writing.

RAMA
 
Re: Dark Horizons movie Review it's out.

TMP focused on Trek's science fiction at the exclusion of it's fun space adventure... ST09 seems to be doing the opposite.

I am prepared to enjoy both.

Me too.
Anything that could give us "The City on the Edge of Forever" and "A Piece of the Action" or "Balance of Terror" and "The Trouble with Tribbles" should be able to entertain us on many levels. As I posted above, let's just hope Abrams realizes the range of possibilities, too. I hope he doesn't believe it has to be Star Trek: Full Throttle all the time.
 
Hopefully, the outcome will mirror that of the first Hulk movie, where they just abandoned it and started over. If future movies and series continue to take place in the primary Trek universe, this picture will become a lot easier to take, as a novelty or footnote, perhaps one of those supernumary universes we caught a glimpse of in "Parallels."

Uh they aren't going to abandon this timeline after putting so much work into starting it. Hulk was rebooted again because the first was a box office disappointment. This almost assuredly won't be.

This is the official Trek universe and timeline now, and it will be continued from there. This movie is tracking to be HUGE, they aren't going back to the old rather niche universe.

This is the future of Trek, whether you want it to be or not. It's far too late to go back.
 
Re: Dark Horizons movie Review it's out.

Seems like Star Trek: The motion Picture all over again.

Except that ST:TMP bored most people, especially non-fans.

You know, as I have gotten older, I have really come to love TMP more than any other Star Trek movie. Out of all of them, it really is the only true sci-fi in the bunch, and there is so much character in it. Spock is especially well played, but McCoy, Kirk, and Decker all fill the screen as real people, and their motivations and insights play an important role in the plot instead of just being window dressings upon it.

Sure, it is slow-paced, but it is also cerebral, filled with insights into humanity and philosophy. A robot that doesn't realize that it is still human? A Machine that thinks it is alive and greater than the gods that created it to the point that it dismisses them outright? A man striving for pure intellectualsim taken to tears by the tragity of life? An aging man struggling with his childish ambition? A young man striving to prove himself?
Apotheosis of said character?

These are all fantastic elements, and to me, the movie really is dense, but instead of an action sort of way it is in a literary sort of way. It is filled with ideas and ponderings, and it does a perfect job, in my book.

Fans of hard sci-fi movies like, oh, say, the original Solaris can respect a slightly slower-moving plot. It wont keep you attention unless you are willing to think a little, and I think that is what movies in general these days need.
 
Re: Dark Horizons movie Review it's out.

I'm a tad concerned about Nero now but I completely take his point that now that this film is out the way, the sequel could be a Dark Knight.

What's funny is months ago, Bana actually called his part a cameo.

I just wish we (fans and producers) could move away from this whole "out-Khaning Khan" thing. It's become "The Villain of the Week."

The mistake this time is not that Nero isn't as badass or intellectually deep as Khan. The mistake seems to be that not enough attention was paid to him in the first place. Unlike Khan, Nero was an ordinary guy. No blood on his hands. Given what's happened to him, why shouldn't we be allowed to feel some sympathy for this guy? And, why can't he listen to reason? What about any conflicted feelings? After all, if the comic book set-up holds, the Romulans are as culpable for their destruction as Vulcan or the Federation. Maybe moreso. Perhaps the last planet he should destroy is Romulus.
But instead, it seems we get the galactic equivalent of someone going on a mindless shooting spree.

I'd like to see something different in the next movie. An antagonist more like Trelane in spirit. Or Harry Mudd. Or, conflict along the lines of "The Alternative Factor" or "The Immunity Syndrome". Even conflict like TVH or TMP. There has to be more out there than scenery-chewing, Shakespeare quoting, misplaced genius evil-doers, or good guys gone bad to vex our heroes.

If this movie can re-open the whole space-opera genre, then let's see Abrams use Trek to explore its possibilities to its fullest. That would be my hope.


I have news for you, STII has several interesting themes, but Khan's character was not "intellectually deep" by any stretch of the imagination. The success of Khan in that movie had a lot to do with Montalban's performance, and not the writing.

RAMA

You're kinda right. Actually, folks tend to overrate just how deep any of Trek was. But Khan was supposed to have a superior intellect. That's what I meant. And, he could quote Captain Ahab (and do it in the proper context). Let's see Nero top that. :)
 
Re: Dark Horizons movie Review it's out.

Since the Dark Horizons review has already been linked to (and caused a little consternation) in the No-Spoilers review and discussion thread, in the interest of keeping things tidy, I'm going to merge this thread with the Spoilers review and discussion thread. Stand by...
 
Last edited:
Re: Dark Horizons movie Review it's out.

Seems like Star Trek: The motion Picture all over again.

Except that ST:TMP bored most people, especially non-fans.
Indeed. Why is it they thought that 10 minutes of shitty, 70's era CGI as the Enterprise is taking sweet ass time entering V'Ger as slow as humanly possible made for a good movie?


At the time, that shitty 70's Era CGI, was just about state-of-the-art...

I took both my BF (at the time) and my brother's GF to see it even though neither of them were Trek fans, they both liked it and weren't bored at all.

The build up to finally seeing V'GER, (with Goldsmith's music in the background) was very cool to this 20 year old Trekkie (at the time), even after several viewings.
 
Re: Dark Horizons movie Review it's out.

Except that ST:TMP bored most people, especially non-fans.
Indeed. Why is it they thought that 10 minutes of shitty, 70's era CGI as the Enterprise is taking sweet ass time entering V'Ger as slow as humanly possible made for a good movie?


At the time, that shitty 70's Era CGI, was just about state-of-the-art...

I took both my BF (at the time) and my brother's GF to see it even though neither of them were Trek fans, they both liked it and weren't bored at all.

The build up to finally seeing V'GER, (with Goldsmith's music in the background) was very cool to this 20 year old Trekkie (at the time), even after several viewings.

Would I get flamed by both sides for pointing out that TMP's FX was all model photography (prior to the DE dvd, anyways)?
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top