Seems like Star Trek: The motion Picture all over again.
Didn't bore me, but I also liked 2001.Seems like Star Trek: The motion Picture all over again.
Except that ST:TMP bored most people, especially non-fans.
Didn't bore me, but I also liked 2001.Seems like Star Trek: The motion Picture all over again.
Except that ST:TMP bored most people, especially non-fans.
Indeed. Why is it they thought that 10 minutes of shitty, 70's era CGI as the Enterprise is taking sweet ass time entering V'Ger as slow as humanly possible made for a good movie?Seems like Star Trek: The motion Picture all over again.
Except that ST:TMP bored most people, especially non-fans.
I'm a tad concerned about Nero now but I completely take his point that now that this film is out the way, the sequel could be a Dark Knight.
What's funny is months ago, Bana actually called his part a cameo.
I just wish we (fans and producers) could move away from this whole "out-Khaning Khan" thing. It's become "The Villain of the Week."
The mistake this time is not that Nero isn't as badass or intellectually deep as Khan. The mistake seems to be that not enough attention was paid to him in the first place. Unlike Khan, Nero was an ordinary guy. No blood on his hands. Given what's happened to him, why shouldn't we be allowed to feel some sympathy for this guy? And, why can't he listen to reason? What about any conflicted feelings? After all, if the comic book set-up holds, the Romulans are as culpable for their destruction as Vulcan or the Federation. Maybe moreso. Perhaps the last planet he should destroy is Romulus.
But instead, it seems we get the galactic equivalent of someone going on a mindless shooting spree.
I'd like to see something different in the next movie. An antagonist more like Trelane in spirit. Or Harry Mudd. Or, conflict along the lines of "The Alternative Factor" or "The Immunity Syndrome". Even conflict like TVH or TMP. There has to be more out there than scenery-chewing, Shakespeare quoting, misplaced genius evil-doers, or good guys gone bad to vex our heroes.
If this movie can re-open the whole space-opera genre, then let's see Abrams use Trek to explore its possibilities to its fullest. That would be my hope.
TMP focused on Trek's science fiction at the exclusion of it's fun space adventure... ST09 seems to be doing the opposite.
I am prepared to enjoy both.
Hopefully, the outcome will mirror that of the first Hulk movie, where they just abandoned it and started over. If future movies and series continue to take place in the primary Trek universe, this picture will become a lot easier to take, as a novelty or footnote, perhaps one of those supernumary universes we caught a glimpse of in "Parallels."
Seems like Star Trek: The motion Picture all over again.
Except that ST:TMP bored most people, especially non-fans.
I'm a tad concerned about Nero now but I completely take his point that now that this film is out the way, the sequel could be a Dark Knight.
What's funny is months ago, Bana actually called his part a cameo.
I just wish we (fans and producers) could move away from this whole "out-Khaning Khan" thing. It's become "The Villain of the Week."
The mistake this time is not that Nero isn't as badass or intellectually deep as Khan. The mistake seems to be that not enough attention was paid to him in the first place. Unlike Khan, Nero was an ordinary guy. No blood on his hands. Given what's happened to him, why shouldn't we be allowed to feel some sympathy for this guy? And, why can't he listen to reason? What about any conflicted feelings? After all, if the comic book set-up holds, the Romulans are as culpable for their destruction as Vulcan or the Federation. Maybe moreso. Perhaps the last planet he should destroy is Romulus.
But instead, it seems we get the galactic equivalent of someone going on a mindless shooting spree.
I'd like to see something different in the next movie. An antagonist more like Trelane in spirit. Or Harry Mudd. Or, conflict along the lines of "The Alternative Factor" or "The Immunity Syndrome". Even conflict like TVH or TMP. There has to be more out there than scenery-chewing, Shakespeare quoting, misplaced genius evil-doers, or good guys gone bad to vex our heroes.
If this movie can re-open the whole space-opera genre, then let's see Abrams use Trek to explore its possibilities to its fullest. That would be my hope.
I have news for you, STII has several interesting themes, but Khan's character was not "intellectually deep" by any stretch of the imagination. The success of Khan in that movie had a lot to do with Montalban's performance, and not the writing.
RAMA
Since the Dark Horizons review has already been linked to (and caused a little consternation) in the No-Spoilers review and discussion thread, in the interest of keeping things tidy, I'm going to merge this thread with the Spoilers review and discussion thread. Stand by...
Indeed. Why is it they thought that 10 minutes of shitty, 70's era CGI as the Enterprise is taking sweet ass time entering V'Ger as slow as humanly possible made for a good movie?Seems like Star Trek: The motion Picture all over again.
Except that ST:TMP bored most people, especially non-fans.
Yeah, we were discussing this review earlier in the "Screening - No Spoilers" thread. It seems to me to be a very positive, encouraging review.
Indeed. Why is it they thought that 10 minutes of shitty, 70's era CGI as the Enterprise is taking sweet ass time entering V'Ger as slow as humanly possible made for a good movie?Except that ST:TMP bored most people, especially non-fans.
At the time, that shitty 70's Era CGI, was just about state-of-the-art...
I took both my BF (at the time) and my brother's GF to see it even though neither of them were Trek fans, they both liked it and weren't bored at all.
The build up to finally seeing V'GER, (with Goldsmith's music in the background) was very cool to this 20 year old Trekkie (at the time), even after several viewings.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.