But how much would it cost to make? See, that's my point. They got burned by Solo and opted to go a different, very predictable revenue stream, especially with all the COVID uncertainty. Certainty means more right now than the assumption that a movie would automatically mean money. That's the dangerous assumption that got to Solo in the first place that Star Wars=money no matter what. It didn't.If you really don't think a competently managed LFL could make money (not just on theater tickets, but on video game tie-ins, X-Wing toys, home media sales, and Disney+ series spinoff opportunities) from a Star Wars: Top Gun movie, I don't know what to tell ya.![]()
You don't have to agree but if you don't realize how much consistent revenue means to a business and recent uncertainty would impact those decisions I don't know what to tell you.
I think both of those series demonstrated more the attitude of Lucasfilm and returning to Lucas' ideas of innovation and creativity. Book of Boba Fett went the direction of a cinematic idea but on a TV style scale. It allows producers and directors to experiment in smaller installments rather than risking it all on one big tent pole project. In a way, they have gone back to how Lucas was treating Lucasfilm early one, with a lot of innovation that was a head of it's time. I think that the current attitude is going away from films and in to streaming series to cultivate directors, producers, and technological innovation.And while The Mandalorian has doubtless made money for Disney overall, both in D+ subs and Grogu merch, we on the outside really have no idea who profitable Boba Fett and Obi-Wan were/weren't.