It's actually quite hard for women to find durable and beautiful shoes like these. Some of those makers do have very limited ladies ranges but generally the ladies market is dominated by fashion marques. This is one area where Camelopard's earlier point about fashion vs durability being a difference between men and ladies rings very true (the other area is accessories - handbags and the like). The high-end mens shoes are arguably far better than the high-end ladies shoes, combining durability AND beauty.
Unfortunately that's true for clothing as well. I thought I liked my cashmere sweaters until I threw on a mens cashmere sweater for the first time. What a difference!
I had a somewhat similar experience, with a female friend of mine.
We went out onto the porch to have a smoke. It was the middle of winter, and the porch was unheated, so I lent her my overcoat. She expressed amazement at how comfortable and warm it was, and swore that she was going to buy her next overcoat in the men's department.
I think, once again, this reflects the perceived difference in priorities between men's and women's fashion. Clothiers know that most men take relatively little interest in fashion, and want to spend as little time in stores as possible. They will buy just one sweater, or one overcoat, and wear it continuously, sometimes for years. To take one extreme example: I have a favourite sweater that I've worn for six years now, and plan to keep on wearing until I wear holes in the elbows. Why should I buy a new sweater, when the one I have is still perfectly good?
Women, on the other hand, are expected to follow fashion more closely, and to replace their wardrobes more quickly. They are expected to care more about how it looks than how it wears. They are
not expected to keep their clothes until they wear out. As a consequence, manufacturers feel able to cut corners, and make women's clothes more cheaply.
This has the added benefit of
compelling women to live up to expectations: if they try to just keep wearing their clothes, like men do, they'll fall apart.
Historically, men's clothes were generally more expensive than women's clothes, for precisely this reason. The average middle-class man would, historically, pay much more for a suit than a middle-class woman would pay for a dress. But this ceased to be true during the twentieth century.
I think any perceptive person, male or female, understands that women's fashions are a scam, built on a foundation of planned obsolescence. I have often wondered why some clothing manufacturer doesn't make a grab for a larger market share, by offering better-quality, more durable merchandise. The most convincing explanation I've ever heard is that the women's fashion industry is an oligopoly, like the oil industry. If one major player tried to undercut the others in this fashion, the rest would simply be forced to follow suit, and everyone would wind up making less money. So they collude to keep prices as high, and quality as low, as possible.