Yea, pretty brutal non-denial denial if it is all BS. "Unable to confirm the find" had to be a specifically selected statement. A real denial would be "There is no truth to the rumor" or "there are no missing Doctor Who episodes in our possession" or something equally as definitiveThat non-response is VERY suggestive. If they wanted to squelch the rumors, they'd just deny them. But, they intentionally did not deny them. They just could not confirm, which is entirely different.
This almost proves it to me more than anything else!
Mr Awe
And, I don't get the whole thing with Ian? He's always listed as a "super-fan" but so what. He's just some guy. Sounds like an irritating guy too, but I don't know him. I have no idea how people became so interested in him.
If you've seen 'Love & Monsters' then you've seen Ian Levine (minus the literally turning into a monster bit).
He was a fan who managed to wheedle his way into pseudo-involvement with the TV series, including partially writing one story, for which he got "paid" in Video Tapes and other Benefit-In-Kind (a lot of which have turned up on Classic Series DVDs but generally not until he's thrown a tantrum and threatened not to contribute anything ever again).
He's also very, very rich. I mean seriously loaded. Which is why he's taken in recent years to hiring people to make Doctor Who, animated and live-action (with the real actors) for the benifit of himself and the chosen few he shows it to.
If there is no truth to the rumor, they'd better state that ASAP otherwise there will be a lot of bitter fans. If there's no truth, it's in their power to let us know. I will be annoyed if there's nothing to it and they don't tell us straight away.
Which story did he partially write?
And both of them vehemently deny Levine's involvement.Which story did he partially write?
"Attack of the Cybermen." Officially credited to Paula Moore, Eric Saward's ex-girlfriend.
Was he the big guy who was the Absorbalof or whatever? (I try to forget that episode.)
Didn't know he was so loaded. But, if he's so rich, why does he need free video tapes?!
Well, the next time he throws a tantrum and threatens to not contribute anymore, they should take him up on that promise! I mean seriously, not contribute?! He's already not contributing.
Which story did he partially write?
Thanks for the info, BTW. I still think he's completely non-relevant!
And both of them vehemently deny Levine's involvement.Which story did he partially write?
"Attack of the Cybermen." Officially credited to Paula Moore, Eric Saward's ex-girlfriend.
Was he the big guy who was the Absorbalof or whatever? (I try to forget that episode.)
Didn't know he was so loaded. But, if he's so rich, why does he need free video tapes?!
Was he the big guy who was the Absorbalof or whatever? (I try to forget that episode.)
Didn't know he was so loaded. But, if he's so rich, why does he need free video tapes?!
Well, the next time he throws a tantrum and threatens to not contribute anymore, they should take him up on that promise! I mean seriously, not contribute?! He's already not contributing.
Which story did he partially write?
Thanks for the info, BTW. I still think he's completely non-relevant!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ian_Levine
You might also want to check out this recently published book which has plenty of juicy Levine tidbits and is also one of the best, if at times shocking, behind-the-scenes accounts of DW production.
You are right, however. These days he is completely irrelevant, but worth watching for being highly amusing, albeit completely unintentionally.
My very slight curiosity about the guy has been satisfied so no need for more research! However, I do plan to get that book because I am particularly interested in JNT's time. Davison is "my Doctor" even though I started watching with Tom Baker.
Mr Awe
If there is no truth to the rumor, they'd better state that ASAP otherwise there will be a lot of bitter fans. If there's no truth, it's in their power to let us know. I will be annoyed if there's nothing to it and they don't tell us straight away.
I don't mean this in a bad way, but fans really don't matter to the BBC. If fans get their hopes dashed over the non-appearance of forty-plus year-old episodes, that's not going to keep them away from the new episodes. For the brand managers of Doctor Who, missing episodes are nothing more than a curiosity that have no bearing on what they're doing with the property. The people at the BBC that would have the most interest in missing episodes would be BBC Worldwide since the episodes would give them more product to sell, but BBC Worldwide doesn't drive the brand.
They could get an army of people to work on restoring the footage for free if they wanted to, that how desperate some fans are to get these back.
My very slight curiosity about the guy has been satisfied so no need for more research! However, I do plan to get that book because I am particularly interested in JNT's time. Davison is "my Doctor" even though I started watching with Tom Baker.
Mr Awe
Cool, it's excellent.... and terrible all at the same time
Meanwhile, the Radio Times is the latest to weigh in...
Or more likely Radio Times got their facts mixed up in regards to Sierra Leone.My very slight curiosity about the guy has been satisfied so no need for more research! However, I do plan to get that book because I am particularly interested in JNT's time. Davison is "my Doctor" even though I started watching with Tom Baker.
Mr Awe
Cool, it's excellent.... and terrible all at the same time
Meanwhile, the Radio Times is the latest to weigh in...
So now we're shifting from Zambia to Sierra Leone, which we all know lost it's archive in 2001 during the civil war.
And it's a TIE archive? That would make the most sense as it would be likely to have MOST of the serials ever sold around the world.
The rumour keeps shifting too much for my liking...
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.