Well tough shit for "some people". "Some people" didn't make the movie. The filmmakers did. And the filmmakers should be the ONLY ones who decide whether an alternate cut is made available. IF such an alternative is available, then great. But "some people" are not more qualified than the filmmakers themselves to decide what was important to a film. I have no problem with filmmakers making the option available if they wish--I have a problem with "some people" thinking it is their "right" to have an alternate cut. "Some people" are not OWED anything by the filmmakers beyond what the filmmakers choose to make available. The sooner "some people" learn that, the better.
Interesting that people are willing to give J.J. Abrams so much latitude on this, but scream bloody murder at the Star Wars Special Editions.

) but I will defend their rights to do what they wish with their creations. It is always my preference that an original theatrical cut be available (as I would very much like in the case of Amadeus and JFK--the latter would be very helpful for my research interests) but I also know that I am owed nothing from the creators of any work of art--popular or fine. I am free to decide how to respond to what they make available--that is the extent of my "rights" in the matter. Too many cases exist where creators are not able to maintain their vision as they see fit for me to begrudge those instances where they do have that ability, even if their ultimate choices disappoint me.
. Has anybody even seen the movie, yet?
(WHY?)