• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Will the new enterprise be larger than the TOS?

If anything, I think the Enterprise crew is too small for its size. To put things in comparison, a Nimitz-class aircraft carrier is 340 metres long and displaces about 100,000 tons with a full load. A Constitution-class ship, on the other hand, is about 280 metres long and has a mass of greater than 1,000,000 tons, supposedly.

The crew complement? 432 on a Connie, and 5500 on a Nimitz.

Extensive automation as you'd expect on a starship accounts for the crew complement easily enough, also the carriers have disproportionately high crewing requirements relative to other military and civilian vessels, primarily on account of the air wing and related support infrastructure.
 
I'm going to post a hundred times saying how bad it looks and then more and more people will agree with me----nobody ever looks at the name of the poster anyway.
 
We haven't seen the interior of the hanger deck. What are you talking about?

He's probably mistaken the hangar we have seen in the trailer for the hangar of the Enterprise.

Wait. How do we know I've mistakenly identified it as the hangar of the Enterprise? Let's discuss this.

The scene's been identified by people who have seen parts of the film as one showing Starfleet cadets being assigned to ships during an emergency and boarding shuttles for them. This is the scene in which Kirk talks McCoy into getting him aboard the Enterprise via a "medical regulation."
 
Just for a general perspective FYI - Anyone that has been to Oriole Park at Camden Yards in Baltimore, the warehouse that is next to the stadium is approximately the same length as TOS Enterprise (900ft)

LINK1

LINK2
 
He's probably mistaken the hangar we have seen in the trailer for the hangar of the Enterprise.

Wait. How do we know I've mistakenly identified it as the hangar of the Enterprise? Let's discuss this.

The scene's been identified by people who have seen parts of the film as one showing Starfleet cadets being assigned to ships during an emergency and boarding shuttles for them. This is the scene in which Kirk talks McCoy into getting him aboard the Enterprise via a "medical regulation."
It's also
almost certainly a ground-based shuttleport based on visual evidence (i.e., the sunlight shining in the windows from the exterior in a way that would not be consistent with a shipborne shuttle bay.) Compare a still from the movie

(click to enlarge) with this photo

usn3_InteriorofHangarOne.jpg


of the old Hangar One at Moffett Field.
 
I think people severely underestimate just how big the TOS Enterprise would be in real life.

Anyone ever seen an Aircraft carrier? Now think Enterprise.

Enterprise Scale Video by Tallguy (Youtube link)

Yeah, the original TOS ship was supposed to be 289 meters long(948 feet plus change) and the TMP/movie refit design was 305 meters(1,001 feet and a few inches), so actually most modern, real-life USN supercarriers are longer than the Kirk Enterprises were.
 
If anything, I think the Enterprise crew is too small for its size. To put things in comparison, a Nimitz-class aircraft carrier is 340 metres long and displaces about 100,000 tons with a full load. A Constitution-class ship, on the other hand, is about 280 metres long and has a mass of greater than 1,000,000 tons, supposedly.

The crew complement? 432 on a Connie, and 5500 on a Nimitz.

Extensive automation as you'd expect on a starship accounts for the crew complement easily enough, also the carriers have disproportionately high crewing requirements relative to other military and civilian vessels, primarily on account of the air wing and related support infrastructure.

True on both counts, of course. I guess I should have phrased that to say that based on its size compared to a modern vessel, you'd expect a much larger complement. I also wanted to point out that a ship can comfortably house a lot more people than one might expect at first glance.
 
He's probably mistaken the hangar we have seen in the trailer for the hangar of the Enterprise.

Wait. How do we know I've mistakenly identified it as the hangar of the Enterprise? Let's discuss this.

The scene's been identified by people who have seen parts of the film as one showing Starfleet cadets being assigned to ships during an emergency and boarding shuttles for them. This is the scene in which Kirk talks McCoy into getting him aboard the Enterprise via a "medical regulation."

Where's that tidbit come from?

And how does it invalidate my point about the bridge set size? :)
 
And how does it invalidate my point about the bridge set size?

It doesn't. You asked how we knew that the hangar set isn't the Enterprise hangar.

The point about the bridge is kind of a non-point, in that the larger bridge would fit into a ship the size of the original Enterprise or for that matter a ship half its size so it's no evidence on its own for either an up-or-down scaled ship.

Now, what people are saying about the Engineering deck (not yet seen) does suggest either a much larger ship or one that's laid out very differently.
 
Given the almost entire lack of windows in the engine hull, my guess is that it contains the hangar/cargo area and a HUGE engine...and that's it. If they did that, you could fit an 8 deck engine room in there without scaling up.
 
That may be true. The Engineering deck, which is apparently essentially rows of brewery tanks, probably takes up most of that space.
 
That may be true. The Engineering deck, which is apparently essentially rows of brewery tanks, probably takes up most of that space.

Although, when you think of it, the TOS engine room didn't look like a more advanced 80s/90s warp core set either...or even the TMP redesign from '78-'79. It never showed a vertical or even horizontal warp core full of glowing plasma and was basically just a bunch of big generator-looking thingys with blinking lights and mesh grating in front of them. So in a roundabout way the new movie engine room will probably feel more like TOS's than we think.
 
^The engineering set has been referred to as very large and interestingly "industrial" so I think we're going to see something more like the TOS engineering just far larger, more open plan and active than anything they could manage in the 60's.
 
^The engineering set has been referred to as very large and interestingly "industrial" so I think we're going to see something more like the TOS engineering just far larger, more open plan and active than anything they could manage in the 60's.

And with more brewery tanks as well.
 
^The engineering set has been referred to as very large and interestingly "industrial" so I think we're going to see something more like the TOS engineering just far larger, more open plan and active than anything they could manage in the 60's.

And with more brewery tanks as well.

Scotty's idea of combining engineering and the ships alcohol production facilities? :lol:
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top