No offense, but I certainly hope so!
there's probably still a fair number of moviegoers (teenage ones, specifically) that won't see Star Trek because of the "nerd factor" of the fanbase
T3, on the other hand, made $283 million from international markets (almost two-thirds of its $433 million worldwide gross). And I think T4 is going to gross more than T3.
Arnold's worldwide box office appeal had slipped a lot with The 6th Day and Collateral Damage. T3's box office was a combination of the appeal of the Terminator franchise and Schwarzenegger's popularity in that particular role.T3 only did so well internationally because Arnold has a very large fanbase overseas. T4 won't have Arnold so it won't do as well.
there's probably still a fair number of moviegoers (teenage ones, specifically) that won't see Star Trek because of the "nerd factor" of the fanbase
If only the nerds had gone to Star Trek XI then it would have flopped big time like Nemesis. Star Trek XI has brought in many fans.
My full review isn't allowed to be posted until the 21st, but: it was pretty good.nx1701g, can you say whether you liked the film?
MSNBC seems to be of the impression that Star Trek will be the big hit of the summer and will last the longest.
When people are still demanding more Terminator 40 years after it was made you might be able to say that with more authority.T4 will beat star trek, Terminator is far more popular then Trek could ever be, I'm affraid.
When people are still demanding more Terminator 40 years after it was made you might be able to say that with more authority.T4 will beat star trek, Terminator is far more popular then Trek could ever be, I'm affraid.
And a Bond movie without Connery won't work, right?I'm predicting No. I'm thinking a Terminator movie without Arnold is not going to draw the numbers a lot of people are expecting it will.
Are you serious. The 4 best Batman movies have no Robin. The '89Batman, its sequel, Batman Begins and The Dark Knight. Again, Arnold as much as I love him isn't necessary for the thrust of the story.Not having Robin in the last two "Batman" movies didn't hurt them and neither did the lack of campy humor. I wouldn't go writing it off so quickly just because Ah-nold won't be in it. So long as the story and action are good, word of mouth will deliver.
So they got that CGI affect down then? Did it look good though?I'm not allowed to discuss the film in depth (yes I have seen it already), but I can say that Arnold was in the film. I have heard though that there are two versions completed with one having Arnold and the other unedited with Roland (playing Cyberdyne Systems Model 101).
I third this sentiment.When people are still demanding more Terminator 40 years after it was made you might be able to say that with more authority.T4 will beat star trek, Terminator is far more popular then Trek could ever be, I'm affraid.
What he said.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.