The implication was that Picard was showing symptoms that were very much not him...personality changes, explosive temper/losing control of emotions, etc.
Last edited:
The implication was that Picard was showing symptoms that were very much not him...personality changes, explosive temper/losing control of emotions, etc.
Which is directly tied to, more or less, PTSD. One explosive episode in 25+ years isn't a trend, it's an outlier
Except... is his TV appearance really evidence of an explosive temper - He was angry that Starfleet left millions of people to die - What is there to get angry about if not that?
If you think about dementia - getting angry that they forgot the sugar in your coffee is not the same as getting angry that the Federation left people to burn.
Nothing lasts forever.For less than six minutes, as the next show will need the dire potential fall of the Federation for its story fodder. Discovery is already on its third lap with the premise.
Nothing lasts forever.
Not really in this case. It is acknowledging a plot point from AGT as a possibility. What TNG fan is not wondering about this. It could go either way. I'd prefer they stop torturing Picard. They already made him leave Starfleet in disgust and see Dahj die after figuring out she was Data's "daughter." Piling this shit on after Nemesis, Generations, the Borg, etc is starting to be too much. Let Picard have his last mission and not decay tragically while doing so. They probably will make him suffer though. Maybe he'll get cured.This is what is known as establishing a plot point and foreshadowing a future story point. They are establishing this now so that it can be tied back to in a later episode without seemingly it have it come out of the blue
For the last time, AGT was not set in an "alternate timeline." It was set in the ONLY timeline. Then the timeline was rewound slightly at the end of the episode. So you can call that "alternate" if you want, since real history changed from that point on (as the characters discuss at episode's end). But it doesn't make the "past" of that timeline any different. Picard has a defect in his lobe. That's not subject to dispute or interpretation. It's a fact of THIS (the only) timeline.
Considering that everything that happened *AFTER* Picard started moving back and forth through time, before the encounter with Worf and Troi outside the holodeck, was undone..it became an alternate timeline. Among those things that were erased was Picard and Crusher talking about the small defect that could lead to Irumodic Syndrome..therefore that also was part of an alternate timeline.
Now was it there all along? Probably. The fact remains that it was never mentioned again until this most recent episode, so for all we know it was a part of a future that never happened, an alternate future that was completely undone.
Until now that is.
Picard has a defect.
The future timeline in AGT was Q fantasy.
Both can be true.
Nah. It was real enough.You're half right. Picard was visiting a real future, but Q helped him move throughout the timelines. It wasn't a "fantasy", it was a genuine future.
True. But the doctor is looking for potential symptoms. Maybe it has absolutely nothing to do with it, but if outbursts are a potential symptom of a degenerative disease caused by the "defect", and he knows he's had at least one recently (and may have had more when not on interstellar TV), it would be remiss of him not to make the connection.I was kind of irked by the implication that having an outburst like that would be out of character. 14 years of being pissed off and disgusted at starfleet and having to answer that question when he was assured he wouldn't have to is enough to lead most people to outbursts.
Yes - but to be fair the majority of films and TV shows end with rolling credits of who played/did what on the production...It doesn't matter.and we all know how that ended.ST: Picard is Stewart's LOGAN![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.