So, let me ask you this. If you could go back and stop Hitler before he came to power, would you? I agree, I think anyones first instinct would be a resounding Yes! But would it be the best choice? The events of that war were terrible, and I'm sure people, even to this day, still grieve over the lives lost. But the effects of that war, the alliance of powers, women getting to work jobs that were normally "men only" jobs, and as a result possibly speeding up womens equality might not have happened, or atleast have taken a great deal longer. So with that, would you still do it? Now I could see someone saying "Hey, keep an eye on that guy." but more then that I think might be more damaging then helpful.You're talking about the needs of the story - to confront the characters with challenges. I'm talking about the impulse of the characters within a story - to try to mitigate or evade those challenges wherever possible. Like we all do in real life.But those dangerous events are one thing that drive humanities development, and thats one thing I don't see ever changing. They are tragic, they are painful, but as Kirk says himself, "How we deal with death is at least as important as how we deal with life"
The writers will be able to throw challenges at the characters regardless, since they are in total control of everything that happens. There's no reason to have the characters weirdly try to help the writers inflict trouble on them.
Spock can warn Starfleet about everything he knows about, and the writers will just invent a hundred other things that Spock doesn't know about. That shouldn't stop Spock from trying to warn Starfleet. He doesn't realize he's a character in a story, and his warnings are futile and will merely result in a cascade of new Doomsday Machines to replace the one he knows about.
I just want to see Spock do what he should do, namely try to warn Starfleet to the best of his ability, if for no other reason than that it would be stupid and irresponsible for him not to. Plus, do we really want to see a replay of the Doomsday Machine we know about?
I'd rather that threat be eradicated off screen, and the writers get cracking on the threats that will occur regardless of Spock's warnings - or even better, because of Spock's warnings. What if the Doomsday Machine was slated to mow down some brand new alien threat, which now will be spared to wreak havok on the Federation?Hee hee.
Edit: And just to cover my bases, I am NOT, in any way, condoning the actions of Hitler. So hopefully no one will call me a nazi or any silly thing like that.
Your Nazi example isn't acurate since the universe in the Abramsverse has already been altered and has been changed for 20 years. The example you want is what would happen if the timeline was changed years before World War II happen.
In this scenario then yes you should stop the Nazi's because the changes in the timeline means they could win this time. Or they might kill all the Jews. There is no reason for Spock to try and preserve a future that won't even happen in this new timeline, whether he interfere's or not. Therfore there is no reason to not warn people of the dangers that there is a good change of still exsiting in this timeline. Granted some of his warnings might be for moot. For all we know Nero might have destroyed the Botany Bay, for target practice while he was flying around in space for 2o something years. All Spock can do is mention that there is proably chance that Khan might still be alive in this universe. That way he can be neutralized as a threat before he can cause trouble like he did in the Prime Universe. It's possible the timeline changes have already created a scenario that eliminates this threat but there is also a chance it hasn't. You just don't know how things have been altered. All Spock knows is there is a chance he is still out there in the Botany Bay and it wouldn't hurt to go and take a look, just in case.
Jason