Let's be real. The TNG formula was stale by the end of TNG.ENT used the TNG formula that was stale by the end of VOY’s run
I haven't heard about Ira Steven Behr giving feedback on ENT before. When was this revealed?ENT only became more serialized like DS9 when the writer of DS9, Ira Steven Behr, made his thoughts on ENT known to Braga ahead of S3: “the show was a POS”.
The TOS theme was NOT intended to have lyrics. Roddenberry exercised a clause in his contract that allowed him to write lyrics for the theme just so he could get 50% of the royalties, thus screwing composer Alexander Courage out of half of his money. IIRC, he did this years after the fact when TOS was off the air.Having lyrics in the theme song like it was originally intended by TOS.
Honestly, Trek has been falling down on LGBTQ representation since the late 80s. There should've been a gay character in the TNG crew, on a recurring basis at the very least. By the time they got to ENT and it was no longer a novelty for a show to have an LGBTQ character, it was just sad. But that was mostly about Rick Berman's prejudices, from what I understand.Invisibility of LGBT individuals. Except it was the early ‘00s, not the late ‘60s.
I've never heard this before, either. What's the source on this?The show introduced this Temporal Cold War arc, but never involve any of the TOS/TNG/DS9/VOY characters - even though there were ideas for S2 for Picard, Seven of Nine and Guinan to appear in a Suliban story - despite the fact that it could have brought in ratings.
Hey, there's Aisha Tyler! And it only took nine seasons!There's this really difficult drinking game you can play with the sitcom Friends called "Spot the African American".
...Wait, is that it? Am I done already? Wow, that was fast.
According to Bob Justman and Herb Solow's Inside Star Trek: The Real Story, this was more due to NBC than Roddenberry. The cast of "The Cage" is lily white. A big part of the reason people like Lloyd Haynes, Nichelle Nichols, and George Takei were added to the cast after Star Trek went to series was because NBC wanted more minority representation in its shows.Star Trek was always conceived to celebrate diversity, which was alien and groundbreaking in the 60s.
Exactly. There is nothing more binding in a fan's mind than their own headcanon. And when they've had three decades to build it up in their minds, it's a huge uphill battle. The same thing happened with Star Wars.And therein lies the inherent flaw of the 'prequel': The fanbase is going to have their own preconceived notion of what the prequel is going to be about, and it will never live up to what they formed in their minds.
That's why Better Call Saul is the best prequel ever. It was done right after Breaking Bad, by most of the same creative team. And they really took pains to not contradict Breaking Bad. I just watched a video the other day that said one BCS staffer rewatched BB every year just to have it all fresh in her mind before they started a new season of BCS. I doubt there was anyone on the ENT staff who was doing that with TOS.
I don't think it was a case of Brannon and Braga refusing to do their homework. They knew the Borg and the Ferengi didn't belong in the 22nd Century, which is why they took pains to explain it away in those episodes. (I'm not saying that they were successful in doing that, but at least they tried.) The thinking was to incorporate elements from TNG, the most successful version of Trek up until that point.What reason does a TOS prequel need with having episodes about the Ferengi and Borg except for it's two main writers refusing to do homework?
Last edited: