so that's where Trek technology starts straining your suspension of disbelief?
That and the lack of toilets.
so that's where Trek technology starts straining your suspension of disbelief?
That and the lack of toilets.
Heck, one of Roddenberry's ideas for TMP was that humanity had evolved socially beyond the need for clothes in everyday civilian life.In the utopian future of the 24th century, humanity has evolved beyond dressing rooms.![]()
It also implies that in the crew quarters the wardrobes are filled with lines and lines of identical Starfleet uniforms and then things like World War I fighter pilot outfits, Medieval suits of armour and suchlike.I know the real reason is "because it's fun to see the crew walking the halls in unusual costumes", but wouldn't it make more sense to provide changing facilities right inside or right next to the holodecks?
It also implies that in the crew quarters the wardrobes are filled with lines and lines of identical Starfleet uniforms and then things like World War I fighter pilot outfits, Medieval suits of armour and suchlike.
On the other hand, I thought it a bit silly the entire senior staff walk onto the bridge wearing 18th century naval uniforms. I can just imagine the junior officers on duty talking about this later on. "You know if we did that Riker would chew our asses over it."
True, but there was a similar situation on Voyager, Tom Paris was on the holodeck, red alert was called and he had to run to the bridge still in the costume he was wearing on the holodeck, which Chakotay ripped into him over. So I can easily imagine the other bridge officers on the Enterprise believing they were witnessing a double standard when the entire senior staff walk onto the bridge in their holodeck costumes.I thought the only reason they did that was because they didn't have time to change...
It could be interpreted either way. If the clothing was replicated on to them during transport, it would make sense for Picard to instruct the computer such in the transporter room. Although it certainly is possible that they beamed a dressing room into the transporter for the occasion.I don't know how long this existed (in-universe) before ST:FC, but in that film we see Picard giving instructions to the computer as to what clothes he wants to be wearing when the landing party beams down to Earth. So if the computer can do that - change people's clothing mid-transport - it could probably do the same in a holodeck.
Meaning, when you go into a holodeck and activate your program, the computer transports your existing clothes off you, replicates new program-appropriate attire, which it then beams ONTO you.
This is contradicted in several places by the description of the transporter as a matter energy converter.Or then simple. The transporter doesn't have to "do" anything much to its subjects if its function is to just transform a person or an object into his or its phased analogue and then let that analogue exist as it pleases. Every phased molecule holds on to the next one just like their regular versions did before the phasing; there's no need to store any reassembly information because nothing was deassembled in the first place.
Assuming that is physically possible by 24th century technology.However, a holodeck no doubt is complex. It's a consumer product, just about the only consumer product ever seen in Star Trek besides clothing. Of course it would have all the possible bells and whistles, and then some impossible ones thrown in just to make it more attractive. The tiny little bit of extra effort potentially involved in materializing clothing directly on the user would certainly be made.
Timo Saloniemi
The Star Wars EU novels call bathrooms 'freshers'.Somewhere I vaguely recall the bathrooms being referred to as a 'fresher'. Is that a book thing?
True, but there was a similar situation on Voyager, Tom Paris was on the holodeck, red alert was called and he had to run to the bridge still in the costume he was wearing on the holodeck, which Chakotay ripped into him over. So I can easily imagine the other bridge officers on the Enterprise believing they were witnessing a double standard when the entire senior staff walk onto the bridge in their holodeck costumes.
We see Ilia have clothes beamed onto her in the motion picture.
And I don't think the officers stitched themselves into those uniforms...
This is contradicted in several places by the description of the transporter as a matter energy converter.
Assuming that is physically possible by 24th century technology.
Not really. We see Ilia appear by supernatural means (V'Ger makes her happen). The clothing would probably be by supernatural means, too.
It certainly doesn't take a transporter. In "Ensign Ro", the titular character opens a seam in her jacket that simply doesn't exist before it's opened, and no transporter is required for the feat. Future clothing just happens to be seamless, is all.
This mainly happens when the heroes explain stuff to ignorant primitives. No reason to assume it should be true. Especially as there are no major energies involved (a transporter operates on a flashlight battery when required), even though converting a person should involve enough energy to level a small kingdom.
Everything the holodeck does appears to be physically possible within the context. And when even greater feats are seen in "Devil's Due", they are dismissed as cheap parlor tricks.
Really, the most amazing magic in technology today is to be found in entertainment. And rightly so, because the magic aspect is played to the max there. TNG era might not be all that different.
Timo Saloniemi
...But the novel is not read out loud during the movie. And whatever Kirk dials, the audience is not informed of its effects. Our heroes are always pushing obscurely labeled buttons that have no immediately evident effect; it's up to the audience to decide what the buttons are supposed to do. And here they probably are Kirk's desperate attempt to lock the shower door against the intruder, using some sort of a fire alarm override or whatnot (because why would the buttons for actually operating the normal shower functions be located next to Kirk?).
OTOH, the audience does get told that V'Ger is bringing in the Ilia thing - and would really need further prompting if intended to think that her clothes came from another source altogether.
Timo Saloniemi
I am not sure why there would even be a 'lock someone in the shower' button but can see a 'program up some clothes' attached to it making logical sense.
He's doing a multistage beaming anyway - Ilia is sort of sliding in, with the temperature changing and all. That the product isn't finished until it is... Well, it makes sense. We need some excuse for giving Kirk enough time to reach the scene before Ilia steps out, after all.
If you are leaving your cabin, you might want to remotely shut down certain shower functions you forgot to turn off. Say, it would be handy to have an off switch for your oven right at the front door, and some people actually have that nowadays (although it will obviously be in their mobile phones from now on). And if you are coming from the grocer's to prepare a dinner, you might wish to have an on switch for the oven at the front door, too.
However, how could a control for beaming clothes be useful three meters away from said shower? Do you walk naked to the front door, press the button, and then run like hell, hoping to catch the clothing when it materializes in the shower booth?
Timo Saloniemi
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.