• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Why Do People Hate the Star Wars Prequel Trilogy?

Why Do You Hate the Star Wars Prequel Trilogy the Most?

  • The Actors

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • The Plot/Writing

    Votes: 20 28.6%
  • The Era Shouldn't Have Been Explored

    Votes: 2 2.9%
  • It Wasn't Like the Original Trilogy

    Votes: 1 1.4%
  • Nearly Everything Was CGI

    Votes: 2 2.9%
  • The Characters

    Votes: 3 4.3%
  • Political Storylines

    Votes: 1 1.4%
  • Too Many Shades of Grey

    Votes: 1 1.4%
  • Dialog

    Votes: 3 4.3%
  • George Lucas and the People He Put In It (Be More Specific)

    Votes: 4 5.7%
  • There Is More Than One Best Reason to Not Like The

    Votes: 27 38.6%
  • Too Childish

    Votes: 1 1.4%
  • Too Evenly Matched Sides

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • The Action

    Votes: 1 1.4%
  • Other (Comment Below)

    Votes: 4 5.7%

  • Total voters
    70
Need? What does "need" have to do with telling stories about space wizard samurai?


I don't think it was necessary for the Prequel Trilogy's main trilogy. Hell, "Rogue One" seemed like a more plausible addition to the Original Trilogy to me.


Sorry, I already feel like this descent to the Dark Side was rushed in the films. I at least felt like I got some of the good of Anakin in the Clone Wars.

I disagree. Despite his murder of that Tusken village, Anakin felt both anger toward his victims and remorse for what he did. Apparently, his remorse was still around the beginning of "Revenge of the Sith".

But you know what? To each his or her own. I'm just not a "Clone Wars" fan.
 
I don't hate them. They are wildly uneven. Some pretty good stuff, then some absolutely dreadful stuff.
 
I don't think it was necessary for the Prequel Trilogy's main trilogy. Hell, "Rogue One" seemed like a more plausible addition to the Original Trilogy to me.
"Necessary" is just another way of saying "need". All you're doing is repeating the same thing over and over.
Either way it's academic;, Clone Wars is it's own thing, separate from (but connected to) the PT. Nobody (including the show runners) ever claimed it was meant to be an intrinsic part of the movie narrative. It's supplemental material.
 
Last edited:
After ANH none of it was "necessary" or needed.
And Star Wars itself wasn't necessary or needed in the first place. I surely have enjoyed it though, pretty much every film and TV episode, even while also finding things worthy of criticism.

I agree with those who think that TCW enriched both the PT and SW. It did.

I also think it's important to remember that there would be no TCW without the PT. In particular, TCW was written, I suspect, to improve on certain shortcomings of the PT, as noted by others upthread, as well as to tell its own story (and stories) between the endpoints of AOTC and ROTS.
 
I also think it's important to remember that there would be no TCW without the PT. In particular, TCW was written, I suspect, to improve on certain shortcomings of the PT, as noted by others upthread, as well as to tell its own story between the endpoints of AOTC and ROTS.
I agree. I don't think we would have TCW without the PT, for good or ill. And, certainly, TCW did more to help the Jedi feel more sympathetic in my view that the PT, ROTJ and even the ST, have done combined. Nature of the beast, I suppose.
 
I wonder if the order in which someone saw the SW films has a significant effect on whether that person has a positive or negative impression about the PT vs the OT.

I saw the OT first; the OT came out first, obviously. But to a different generation of SW viewers, when all of the PT and OT movies are available at the same time, the movies can be seen in order from episode 1 to 6.

There are significant stylistic, special effects, and other differences between the PT and OT. After seeing the OT, it created for me a template of what makes for a good movie. Then I saw the PT when they came out. I had certain expectations for the PT, but the PT didn't live up to those expectations.

I have wondered if I had seen the PT first, would it have affected my impression of the PT vs OT. My expectations for the OT would have been different.
 
I disliked the Phantom Menace because it didn't really feel like a Star Wars film to me. Of course, the only thing I could compare it to was the original trilogy. Attack of the Clones was a little better but the first one that truly felt like I was watching a SW movie was Revenge of the Sith. Mind you, this is based on how I felt at the time. I've only seen each movie once and if I watched them today I might feel differently.

Having said that, I think the real reason why those movies didn't live up to my expectations was because I wasn't watching them through the lens of a 9-15 year old kid.
I haven't seen any of the newest movies and have no plans to see them.
 
But you know what? To each his or her own. I'm just not a "Clone Wars" fan.

The Clone Wars, as first mentioned in A New Hope, became kind of this mysterious, legendary thing that I feel (after watching the second trilogy) should have been left alone. Or at the very least, I wish Lucas had made the second trilogy closer to the end of the original trilogy. I think had he made those movies hot off the heels of Return of the Jedi, they would have been received much better.
 
As someone who does not hate the Prequels I may have a unique perspective on them.

First, it must be said that the PT are not as good as the OT. Lucas knew that going in. So there is that which causes a lot of people to complain about them. Second, Lucas wrote and directed each of them himself. He did have some help credited on Attack of the Clones, but that is the weak point of the PT so the other writer didn't help. Third, Lucas had a very singular vision of what he wanted the story to be. I find that he was too covert in some of his story telling. He should have made it more obvious that Palpatine and Sidious are one and the same and that both the blockade of Naboo and the Clone War were just grand ploys to gain power. The trilogy is about the rise of Palpatine and the fall of Anakin and the Jedi. The story just is not clear on the surface. Too many things are done very subtly. It hides the real story and hurts the story arc.

I've noticed other things. Everything about the PT is based on typical 30's and 40's story telling. It didn't go over well for the modern audience. The comic relief is too in your face. Jar Jar in TPM and C-3PO in the droid factory in ATOC. And the relationship between Anakin and Obi-wan in ATOC is too confrontational and you don't get the sense of a friendship there. Anakin chafes too much at Obi-wan. It would have worked better if he was chaffing at the Jedi Order and Obi-wan was more understanding and friendly about it. And these movies show Lucas's weakness in directing actors. He managed it for THX, American Graffiti and Star Wars, but seemed to have fogotten all his directing skills. After watching Hayden's performance many times I figured out that Lucas made him talk like James Earl Jones. If you lower his voice the phrasing matches but he sounds like a moron. A small piece of how he comes across is his own acting skills, but 90% is trying to talk like Darth Vader. A different actor may have pulled it off better. It is rumored that Leonardo DiCaprio was up for the role and he probably would have done better (he certainly would have looked more like Jake Lloyd and Sebastian Shaw).

So pretty much all of the failings I lay at Lucas's feet for the bad execution of what could have been a great story. I enjoy the films (except for the droid factory scene in AOTC), but they fall short of where they could have been.

The other aspect that I see with some franchise movies lies with fan expectation. When fans expect a certain thing and they get something else, many don't react well. Many often don't realize their dislike lies in their own expectations and they try to find someone else to blame. So the actors get blamed, the CG gets blamed (the PT actually had a great deal of practical effects and most of the CG is matte paintings and digital compositing.

What is perhaps the most annoying is that the OT didn't need a special edition and the PT does. But then Lucas never fixed the most blatant errors in the OT for the special edition. But a lot of the issues are unfixable. Jar Jar Binks is fixable by redubbing him in another language (the fan edit I saw used the Hindi language track for Jar Jar). He becomes exponentially less annoying and you don't even have to change the dialog, just subtitle him.
 
So pretty much all of the failings I lay at Lucas's feet for the bad execution of what could have been a great story. I enjoy the films (except for the droid factory scene in AOTC), but they fall short of where they could have been.
This, in general, is my overall summation of my feelings. They are not the worst thing ever. They just are not that could for what they could have been.
 
My greatest wish for Star Wars IX, is that it turns out Han and Leia actually have a hoard of children. We just haven’t seen or heard of them, because they all decided to be Space Accountants or something.

Hell. Have one named Jacen, who’s training to be a lawyer. Throw a bone to the fans of the old EU.
 
Last edited:
I’ve never hated them. I grew up with them. The only thing I didn’t like was the love story in II. It felt rushed and didn’t feel organic.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top