We all do. That's why the wall is there.
Whose names would you put on the wall?
- Thread starter Arpy
- Start date
Well, you can also believe that the moon landing was fake, Wyoming doesn't exist, the moon is made of cheese, the earth is flat, and all the Morgan Freeman facts are true. I won't judge.So you're saying that it is now confirmed that Starfleet Academy is not canon?!
Birds aren't real.
That white stuff all over statues suggests otherwise.
Cacari ergo sunt. They poop, therefore they are.
I think you're confusing him with Chuck Norris.
Morgan Freeman facts are like Chuck Norris facts, but with less kicking.
But Kathryn Janeway facts rule all. https://www.trekbbs.com/threads/who-needs-chuck-norris-when-youve-got-kathryn-janeway.307281/
Yeah, that was a real nail-biter. There was no way to know how that whole thing was going to turn out. Could have gone either way, could have been the imaginary no-Harry wall.
None of the Chuck Norris facts are true.I think you're confusing him with Chuck Norris.
That was an exhibit, not the actual wall they used on set. The names aren't even in the same order.
I am kind of disappointed with some the names.
Julian Bashir was noted a lieutenant. Did his career in Starfleet end shortly after the end of the Dominion War? Surely, after everything that happened he would have advanced in rank. Even Harry Kim move up the ladder.
Julian Bashir was noted a lieutenant. Did his career in Starfleet end shortly after the end of the Dominion War? Surely, after everything that happened he would have advanced in rank. Even Harry Kim move up the ladder.
I choose to believe Rachel Garrett was removed when they found out she was a sexy Section 31 assassin.
It's obvious from ranks like that which make no sense that the wall is not a record of "final" ranks.
They're probably saving the reveal of what the wall actually means for some poignant teaching moment.
And some of the individuals whose names appeared on the wall would not be remembered at all hundreds of years later.
It's very conceivable. He's only 29 as of Voyager's return home, and he probably gets a 2-rank bump within days, if not hours, of the end of the series. It was clearly stated that he was one of Voyager's best people, so his low rank wasn't due to any deficiency on his part. And, if he averages one promotion after that every 5-6 years (Riker racked up four in a similar span), he's a LCDR by 34, a captain by 45, and he's sticking on Admiral's pips before he reaches age 70. And even if he gets slowed down a bit (such as staying a captain fir a decade or two), retirement age is probably around 90 by the 25th century.
Depends on the specific accomplishments that got their names inscribed there.
Is the rank these people are listed at their final rank, or just the rank at which they first became added to the list, which, as of the 32nd century, is printed on that wall?
Or took another job before being up for promotion.