No, he was injured in a battle some time ago. There's an audio flashback in the episode, "The Void."
You don't see any influence from Ken Burns' Civil War series on Prelude to Axanar? The transitions from the talking head interviews to narrative descriptions of the conflicts are really similar.You've.... never seen a Ken Burns documentary, have you?
I mean, even the intro to Prelude to Axanar is styled after a PBS documentary intro.
I mean, even the intro to Prelude to Axanar is styled after a PBS documentary intro.
Yeah, I'm not sure about Ken Burns per se (been a while but I feel like he's way heavier on the narration stuff) but there's definitely a lot of History channel war documentaries it reminds me of.
This fan work nails the Ken Burns-style documentary than Axanar:
[yt]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oGQ1tJP_26A[/yt]
And this:
[yt]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xk9pP9-_1NA[/yt]
My main issue with WEAT is that Kirk is once again sidelined and doesn't make any decisive, difficult decisions.
My main issue with WEAT is that Kirk is once again sidelined and doesn't make any decisive, difficult decisions.
I had a bit of trouble with the Excelsior moments- Voyager Flashback redux? But I found the overall story and its execution- quite moving.
I usually agree with Ryan, so I'm surprised I came away with a different view of Kirk here. He leaned on the older, savage, tired Sulu- Hard- almost broke him- leveraging all that had come before (prior Trek adventures). I don't know that we always have to see Kirk as Alpha in every scene.
A corollary- I recently read Ellison's set of visions for City on the Edge of Forever. I believe it was stronger in the original (save for the over-the top expensive moments). Kirk doesn't always have to do the saving.
If one looks back over the eps & movies (perhaps when the Shat man was too preoccupied to tinker with the scripts) - often it's Spock that kinda sets 'em up for Kirk to knock down.
TMP- Kirk is a spectator on an amusement ride... Undiscovered Country - Spock (Sherlock?) nearly solves everything.
I think (and this is me) it was clear the production succeeded when I was yelling at the screen, yelling at Kirk (Not Cawley, Kirk) - "Do ... something!" And the moment comes where he just ... can't. The writers didn't package everything up into a sugary sweet ending. The crew thought she was amazing- we thought she was amazing- and then she's just... gone.
Keep in mind that in the "Lolani" ep of Star Trek Continues Kirk is effectively shut out of the win-win as well. He also is also kinda along for the ride in "The White Iris"- and doesn't work very hard to figure out how or why they're trapped (or talk about an escape plan!) in "Divided we Stand".
Maybe season 4 and 5 Kirk is more circumspect?
^^ Ryan-
I'm going to meet you in the middle. I completely get your point of view.
Perhaps, had the writers chosen to jettison the Excelsior stuff, there could have been more substance behind what came across to some as Kirk's passivity.
The opening Romulan battle seemed so rushed- I felt no sense of drama or danger there- just an exercise to get our characters and plot device where each needed to be.
Had the battle been longer- Had Kirk done something tactically amazing- then - (from a good and believable! story perspective) the pressure would be off for him to save the ship again-
Here's where the perennially underutilized doctor could have been added to the story- Jim knows he just can't shoot a bad guy and have the situation resolved. McCoy has to say it out loud :
"A good young lady's gonna die now Jim- there's no outmaneuvering it."
Obviously there's a scene with that paraphrase.
There goes the Excelsior framing device (and possibly the Scott/Alana "gift" scenes as well) - but such a scene might have gotten you where you need to be. Spock would have made it quite clear there was no win for Alana, Bones would have enabled Kirk to reluctantly accept it.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.