A more interesting question is to what extent one's behaviour has been influenced by the ten commandments.
Not so much for me.
Me neither, considering I had to look them up!
A more interesting question is to what extent one's behaviour has been influenced by the ten commandments.
Not so much for me.
Perhaps not directly, but I think they influence me and both of you quite a lot. After all, our societal morals are based very strongly in these tenets, and I'm sure we'd agree that, at least for numbers 6-10 as the OP ordered them, they are generally good moral guidelines.A more interesting question is to what extent one's behaviour has been influenced by the ten commandments.
Not so much for me.
Me neither, considering I had to look them up!
Perhaps not directly, but I think they influence me and both of you quite a lot.
I'm sure we'd agree that, at least for numbers 6-10 as the OP ordered them, they are generally good moral guidelines.
"Thou Shalt Not Murder" is also suspect, not so much in what it covers as in what it doesn't. The difference between "kill" and "murder" is defined by the state in the interests of the state, such that folks who kill in the name of the state - as a soldier, police officer or executioner - aren't deemed to have committed murder. It places human society in the role of God.
Well, they're Judeo-Christian ideas, so much older than Christianity, and they serve as pretty much the foundation of those religions. So in that our society's morality is so strongly based in Judeo-Christian beliefs, our morality is strongly influenced by the ten commandments. At least, that's how I see it. And certainly many cultures have come to similar moral standards -- many of them are obviosly good moral standards, but it's important to recognize that, historically and currently, there are many societies that differ.Perhaps not directly, but I think they influence me and both of you quite a lot.
Christianity, broadly? Sure. The Ten Commandments not so much. Certainly non-Christian cultures have managed to arrive at very similar guidelines independent of The Bible.
I was taking it in the less literal and broader sense. As someone mentioned earlier, it's actually supposed to apply to pretty much anything belonging to "thy neighbor," though I agree the language is patriarchal.I disagree that "Thou Shalt Not Covet Thy Neighbours Wife" is a good moral guideline. My principal objection is that it's patriarchal, it posits the wife as an object belonging to the husband. The same sentiment could easily be conveyed in a less morally questionable - and more broadly applicable - manner.I'm sure we'd agree that, at least for numbers 6-10 as the OP ordered them, they are generally good moral guidelines.
Again, I was just speaking of them as general moral ideals, rather than specifics. I do agree with you on these points."Thou Shalt Not Murder" is also suspect, not so much in what it covers as in what it doesn't. The difference between "kill" and "murder" is defined by the state in the interests of the state, such that folks who kill in the name of the state - as a soldier, police officer or executioner - aren't deemed to have committed murder. It places human society in the role of God.
"Thou Shalt Not Murder" is also suspect, not so much in what it covers as in what it doesn't. The difference between "kill" and "murder" is defined by the state in the interests of the state, such that folks who kill in the name of the state - as a soldier, police officer or executioner - aren't deemed to have committed murder. It places human society in the role of God.
In its oldest sense, murder was separated from killing (slaying) by secrecy: a publicly admitted killing was a slaying, while a secretly conducted killing was murder.
Regarding the Bible itself, the English meaning of the Hebrew word is unclear; all killing may be proscribed, or only murder, depending on the translation.
I think most people know that, we are just having a bit of fun with the literal meaning.The second commandment isn't well-communicated in this thread. I don't think God really cares if you draw a picture of him. (Well, the Muslims might disagree.)
The second commandment is intended to forbid the worship of false idols.
This thread made me think about "speaking God's name in vain", I didn't even registered things like "God damnit", "for God's sake", as that. Maybe because in English they are considered quite mild swearing (you'll hear it in movies, tv programs, etc), while in Italian swearing involving God's name (bestemmie, "blasphemies") is considered extremely offensive, because the literal meaning is much more violent, e.g. join God's name to something considered filthy or disgusting (pig, dog, shit, hangman, etc), or sexual expressions for the Virgin Mary (bitch, slut, faggot, etc). That's serious culture stuff. But don't go around saying that in Italy.![]()
I think most people know that, we are just having a bit of fun with the literal meaning.The second commandment isn't well-communicated in this thread. I don't think God really cares if you draw a picture of him. (Well, the Muslims might disagree.)
The second commandment is intended to forbid the worship of false idols.
This thread made me think about "speaking God's name in vain", I didn't even registered things like "God damnit", "for God's sake", as that. Maybe because in English they are considered quite mild swearing (you'll hear it in movies, tv programs, etc), while in Italian swearing involving God's name (bestemmie, "blasphemies") is considered extremely offensive, because the literal meaning is much more violent, e.g. join God's name to something considered filthy or disgusting (pig, dog, shit, hangman, etc), or sexual expressions for the Virgin Mary (bitch, slut, faggot, etc). That's serious culture stuff. But don't go around saying that in Italy.![]()
Well, I've heard "La Madonna" in Italy, so they'll use Mary's name in vain (based on the popular interpretation of "in vain".
BTW, I do interpret the meaning of the third commandment very different from most people here. I tend to think the Puritans are the ones who changed it to mean no blasphemous curses.
Oh, blasphemies are widely used indeed (even the very vulgar ones), they are just considered very offensive, so it's better to avoid them in public if you are not sure about the people you are talking with. We had people in television fired on the spot and publicly vilified for blasphemies.Well, I've heard "La Madonna" in Italy, so they'll use Mary's name in vain (based on the popular interpretation of "in vain".
Good news, everyone! I'm only 70% damned!
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.