Brutal Strudel said:
To be more complete, I have to say none of these opinions bug me so long as the holder of said opinions is not obnoxious about it. I can remember an afternoon spent at Borders with a young woman I was somewhat interested in. Things were going great until she saw fit to castigate me for looking at The Star Trek Encyclopedia (to her, it was a case of arrested development--she said it was as if she were still a Partridge Family fan because the two shows are roughly equivalent in intellectual heft). Then she bitched me out for loving Philip K. Dick, one of the 20th century's premiere post-modernists as well as an idiosyncratically brilliant SF writer. That got under my skin. Lucky for my brain but not so much my penis, the relationship went nowhere. Funny thing is, she was a talented poet with good taste in mainstream literature.
Likewise, when a Modern Trek Trekkie pisses all over TOS on the board (rather than shrugging and saying "not really my thing"), I get annoyed.
Conversely, when a science fiction luminary like Tom Disch cuts Trek to bits in a book like The Dreams Our Stuff Is Made Of, I find myself almost pleased--it offers me another perspective onto Trek. Likewise with John Clute's lukewarm-to-tepid opinion of it. Ellison, otoh, amuses me simply because no one does a better job of making a show of vitriol than he does.
(I was thrilled to discover Dick loved Trek, though. Not so much to discover he beat his wife on at least one occasion...)