• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

"Where Silence Has Lease": Nagilum's observations

One thing that did surprise me is that Data specifically stated the "hole in space" has never been encountered before. Yes it has and Kirk found a giant amoeba inside.
 
The Ferengi stopped being credible enemies of the Federation after the first episode they were featured in.

And the Romulans were re-introduced at the end of Season 1, possibly to replace the Ferengi as "main antagonists"

I can see your point, but on the other side they still seemed to try using the Ferengi as at least one of the main antagonists in Season 2, considering that Q especially mentioned them in "Q, Who" and their appearance in "Peak Performance".
 
I can't lie, Nagilum's end statement always felt like something out of an unused script/bit with Q that they dusted off for that scene.

Seriously, read that end assessment in De Lancie's voice at his smuggest and (other the than the remark about common ground) it feels completely natural for Q.
 
I can't lie, Nagilum's end statement always felt like something out of an unused script/bit with Q that they dusted off for that scene.

Seriously, read that end assessment in De Lancie's voice at his smuggest and (other the than the remark about common ground) it feels completely natural for Q.

I'm highly fond of Earl Boen's voice work. The spirit of that message may have been properly conveyed by John de Lancie, but the delivery of the former actor is inimitable.
 
In any event, this has always been one of my favorite episodes. Excellent creep factor, great premise, great performances. And it kicked off the TNG season 2 theme of how dangerous space really is. (At least, I feel that was the theme. Few seasons in the franchise really capture that feel like this one did.)

Excellent music that would reappear in Booby Trap ->

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
The comparison that comes up (and was hinted at in this episode) is that of scientists performing tests on laboratory animals...tests that occasionally result in the death of a subject.
Well that's a handy rationalization I don't completely buy
For Nagilum, the (presumably human) scientists or both?
For Nagilum. There's really nothing that can be remotely compared to scientific about what it's doing. It's not trying to prove some sort of scientific hypothesis, or discover a new way of understanding a scientific notion or what have you, wherein lives of subjects happened to be lost in the effort (which even in itself is debatably ethical)

This creature is merely trying to decide whether the crew are beings worth valuing, by subjecting them to its scrutiny & torment. A certain amount of experimentation might be forgivable, like the original mazelike tests, but saying it should destroy half of them, to see how that goes, is abhorrent.

I think we'd all agree that any scientist who took a newly discovered life form & experimented on it, cruelly enough to destroy it in multitudes of ways, simply out of curiosity, is a horrible scientist & disgusting being, akin to like Mengele. It might as well be a kid pulling the wings of insects
 
I have no problem with a totally alien being not having human ethical standards, ones which actual humans violate as mentioned.
Nagilum even does not really understand much about other creatures being capable of dying. Killing off half the crew to study that was not a surprise, he/she/it can create physical objects (or close enough to physical that for all intents and purposes they are real) which fold space to test Riker and Worf. Nagilum created a warbird indistinguishable from real just to see their reaction.
Nagilum seems comfortable with objects but lacks an understanding of biological ones. For all we know the Enterprise encounter might have been his first contact with limited biologicals and the desire to test and learn about them drives the episode. At the end he does let them go but showing up to chat with Picard indicates he was not done, he just altered the experiment, sort of like Q's neverending trial.
 
Last edited:
I have no problem with a totally alien being not having human ethical standards, ones which actual humans violate as mentioned.
Nagilum even does not really understand much about other creatures being capable of dying. Killing off half the crew to study that was not a surprise, he/she/it can create physical objects (or close enough to physical that for all intents and purposes they are real) which fold space to test Riker and Worf. Nagilum created a warbird indistinguishable from real just to see their reaction.
Nagilum seems comfortable with objects but lacks an understanding of biological ones. For all we know the Enterprise encounter might have been his first contact with limited biologicals and the desire to test and learn about them drives the episode. At the end he foes let them go but showing up to chat with Picard indicates he was not done, he just altered the experiment, sort of like Q's neverending trial.

Had the same impression and considering that
the Metrons, Nacene, Iconians and the Q Continuum was mentioned in Discovery Season 4's latest episode in regard to the DMA and they also brought back a rather obscure species (the Akaali) from ENT, i think there is a really good chance we'll see Nagilum continue it's experiment in Discovery and/or his conclusion.
 
I have no problem with a totally alien being not having human ethical standards, ones which actual humans violate as mentioned.
Neither do I honestly. I'm not a fan, obviously, but it should be expected that they'd come across that out there. The main issue is that it's a hypocrite at the end, passing judgements on the crew as if it's somehow above those traits it condemns others for

If I were Picard, I'd have been like... "Quick to judge, rash & aggressive? Dude! 5 minutes ago you were headlong into snuffing us out for a book report. Don't understand us? Fine. Don't like or approve of us? Cool. Want us to bugger off? Great. Just spare me your empty platitudes, dick."
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top