• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

When did Discovery JUMP the Shark?

Star Trek Discovery Jumped The Shark right from the start with the Spore Drive. Really? Mushrooms can teleport you across the galaxy? I think someone did too many 'Shrooms while writing it.

Warp Drive was an actual scientific concept from JPL (Jet Propulsion Laboratory), who were consultants on the original Star Trek.

Where did the Spore Drive idea come from? They may as well have based it on Sapporo beer from Japan and called it the Sapporo Drive. Although using beer as a fuel for Space Propulsion is an idea called the Hopps Drive.

Then there's the Red Angel suit. Which Manga did that come from? If you put five of them together does it create Voltron?

All in all, I've always thought Discovery was great Science Fiction. Just not good Star Trek. But Star Trek has always had some wiggle room to it.
 
Discovery is a lot like Enterprise for me. Season 2 was where I dropped off for both only to pick it up later on. The reboot helped a lot. Also what the show actually does best is some character moments here and there that's top quality in Season 3 and 4. Actually this is the modern Star Trek writer's strong suit it seems, certainly not the plots and narratives. The latest episode, episode 4 of season 5 had a very satisfying ending because the character moments really delivered like they were supposed to. The new number one is very good at reading people, and that's one way to connect to others and he used his ability to do that. So he actually took in criticism, and applied it. That's top quality stuff so the show hasn't jumped the shark if it can still deliver on something. Sure it's no DS9 or TNG when it was hitting on all cylinders but I'll watch it.
 
Jumping the Shark implies a sudden turn for the worse. As far as I can tell, DIS didn't really do that. Nor did it grow the beard. It simply presented a product that some viewers liked and others didn't care for. And, opinions on which season was best and worst seem to vary quite a bit.

Happy Days jumped the shark. But I don't know of any Trek series that did.
 
I'm just not bothering with them anymore. There's no point. We're in the final season, six episodes left. After this, they'll just move on to the next big thing to hate.

They'll forget about this show and, 10 years from now, they'll forget they even hated it. Just like they forget they hated Star Trek during the B&B Era.

Yeah but they'll find twenty other things to lazily call 'Woke' without further elaboration.
 
Jumping the Shark implies a sudden turn for the worse. As far as I can tell, DIS didn't really do that. Nor did it grow the beard. It simply presented a product that some viewers liked and others didn't care for. And, opinions on which season was best and worst seem to vary quite a bit.

Happy Days jumped the shark. But I don't know of any Trek series that did.

Cause Trek shows get their crappy seasons out of the way at the start.
 
Can we get a definition?

All of the complaints define what makes bad Trek. Some of the complaints suck on their own, but that seems to happen when coupled with The Internet. But the more complaints there are about the same thing, the more likely that what's being complained about actually sucks.

Although I watched the first 2 seasons of Discovery and could not figure out what was supposed to be "Woke" about it.
 
All of the complaints define what makes bad Trek. Some of the complaints suck on their own, but that seems to happen when coupled with The Internet. But the more complaints there are about the same thing, the more likely that what's being complained about actually sucks.

Although I watched the first 2 seasons of Discovery and could not figure out what was supposed to be "Woke" about it.

It is entirely possible to tear Disco a new one without any reference to woke.

You have to understand that this is an echo chamber - one that has made deflection into an art form over the years and bludgeoned any diverse or meaningful debate. The majority of complaints against the show are perfectly valid.
 
Jumping the Shark implies a sudden turn for the worse. As far as I can tell, DIS didn't really do that. Nor did it grow the beard. It simply presented a product that some viewers liked and others didn't care for. And, opinions on which season was best and worst seem to vary quite a bit.

Happy Days jumped the shark. But I don't know of any Trek series that did.
I agree with this - for better or worse, Discovery has been more or less the same since day one. There's no big moment where the show got much better or much worse.
 
If Rayner were around for a DISCO season 6 and 7, I'd be for that. But only if they moved to episodic. Arcs are not this show's strong suit.
I wouldn't be surprised if he moves to SFA as like a field instructor or something. The kids are going to need a professor Xavier, after all.
 
The very first post in this thread seems to take a perverse joy in reiterating the word "cancelled" as often as possible. The toxicity is real, and was there from before the show even premiered amongst a subset of fans. That was the real moment of danger this show faced - and it faced it before it even started. Trolling? No. Intentionally provocative? Yes.

Yep. I haven't lost my love for Star Trek itself due to the modern series - indeed, they have enhanced it - but I have certainly lost pretty much all enjoyment I have from the fandom.

There were many fans against Disco from even before it premiered, often openly expressing their bigotry. It had always been a part of Trek fandom, the sort of people who complained about the kiss in Rejoined and sent hate mail over the mere rumour of a gay character in Voyager, but never had they been so open about it.

Then there is the tribalism, where people can't just talk up the shows they like, but have to go out of their way to try to attack others and even revel in their perceived failures. Again, nothing new to Trek, but just so pervasive these days.

It's no wonder that the franchise has stagnated for so many years. I have loved Trek for decades and I don't want to be part of the fandom. Why would someone new to it want to be?
 
Cause Trek shows get their crappy seasons out of the way at the start.

Aside from TOS... that one did kind of go downhill in S3, but Fonzie hadn't jumped the shark yet.

Although I watched the first 2 seasons of Discovery and could not figure out what was supposed to be "Woke" about it.

It's a term that means different things for different people. For some, mere cast diversity is enough.

Every time you say woke, a gay angel creates another drag queen.

I woke up early this morni... OH CRAP! I just created another one! :lol:

There were many fans against Disco from even before it premiered, often openly expressing their bigotry.

It was kind of inevitable, when you think about it. Homophobia has been pushed back, but it's far from gone.
 
All of the complaints define what makes bad Trek. Some of the complaints suck on their own, but that seems to happen when coupled with The Internet. But the more complaints there are about the same thing, the more likely that what's being complained about actually sucks.
That doesn't answer my question.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top