Only UPN would name their ship/show after a half mad engine of destruction which nearly destroyed the planet Earth after fragging a couple ships and a star base.
Guy Gardener said:
Who is more caustic and depressing, Voyager's Doctor or Gregory House? Who was instantly redeemed and mellowed out becoming beloved by all those around him after a 1/4 season, and who is a bigger jerk after 4 years?
It's morally bankrupt to instantly redeem characters for no reason practically between scenes and between episodes.
Voyager would have been better if the Doctor had gotten worse after parallax instead of sublimenting itself into a non event.
"Do the characters really believe they are not getting home for seventy years? They don’t act like it. They all believe they are getting home in a couple of hours."
On VOYAGER, there are characters they have given up on. They will just say that to you, flat out. I started asking questions about B’Elanna, who she is. I was saying, ‘I’m having a little trouble watching episodes and getting a handle on her, and what she is about.’ The response was, ‘We don’t have an idea. The past doesn’t matter. Just do whatever you want.’ What are you talking about? How can you give up on your own show? How do you give up on your characters? There is such a cynicism about the show within the people that do the show.
JoeZhang said:
oh and his holo-novel should have been a porno featuring the crew, with all the fallout that would have generated.
What!?Brennyren said:
This is how I see it: you can justify the lack of conflict and the lack of any real desperation on Voyager any way you like, but at the end of the day, the question has to be: if there is no conflict amongst the crew, if there is no desperation in Voyager's situation, then what, exactly, is it that distinguishes VOY from every other Star Trek series? And the answer, I think, is "not much."
Because Trek echos theories and ideas started during the cold war. It was controversial to have a Russian, Japanese & Black person all together in harmony on a TV show. Many viewers expected conflict, just as we do now with the fictious Maquis. However, we never got it in any case. Roddenberry made Trek to show that peace and harmony can happen between people of different religious, political and racial back grounds. He wanted Trek to be about over coming adversity thru tolerance and peace. Voyager continues the idea he started by not having internal conflict onboard Voyager.misskim86 said:
Why would a japanese and russian guy fight in the 23th century?
misskim86 said:
Why would a japanese and russian guy fight in the 23th century?
It was controversial to have a Russian, Japanese & Black person all together in harmony on a TV show.
I eat Cheerios.Ezri said:
It was controversial to have a Russian, Japanese & Black person all together in harmony on a TV show.
Silly rabbit tricks are for kids.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.