DSC is set in the Far Future. A non-prequel show gotta be set just after PIC.Technically any series now made that is set anywhere between the 22nd and 31st century is a prequel
DSC is set in the Far Future. A non-prequel show gotta be set just after PIC.Technically any series now made that is set anywhere between the 22nd and 31st century is a prequel
Well the Star Trek franchise by default is set in "the far future ". Depends on your definition of far. But putting that side., Discovery being set in the 32 century for most if it's run, makes a show before then a prequel. It's a matter of perspective though. What about a show that's takes place during the burn.? Is that a prequel? ( to Discovery) .100 years after PIC? 50 years after? What are those then ? The clean definition is that everything before 32 century ( the furthest "main "setting for the franchise ) is a prequel. if someone new to Trek wanted to see it in chronological order , they would see Discovery 3-5 last.DSC is set in the Far Future. A non-prequel show gotta be set just after PIC.
Those were the Very Short Treks.Oh, and no more of those short treks. With the exception of 'Holograms all the way down' I was literally cringing as I watched them.
And frequently the mystery falls flat, like the 10-C aliens.Mystery box storylines. It’s more that they take a whole season when that’s not necessary than anything else. The story just drags on and on for no reason.
And frequently the mystery falls flat, like the 10-C aliens.
Discovery at the start tried way too hard to be shocking and unexpected, and we ended up with Voq/Tyler "surprise" and the Lorca twist... and of course, Michael as the Red Angel after the misdirection that it would be her mother. Then the cause of the galaxy-ravaging Burn? An innocent child. It's Vince Russo booking Star Trek... and the three of you who get that will understand.
Compare with Prodigy, which tried none of those things and just told a compelling story and was utterly amazing.
Too many cooks and chaos, especially early on.And frequently the mystery falls flat, like the 10-C aliens.
Discovery at the start tried way too hard to be shocking and unexpected, and we ended up with Voq/Tyler "surprise" and the Lorca twist... and of course, Michael as the Red Angel after the misdirection that it would be her mother. Then the cause of the galaxy-ravaging Burn? An innocent child. It's Vince Russo booking Star Trek... and the three of you who get that will understand.
Maybe?Compare with Prodigy, which tried none of those things and just told a compelling story and was utterly amazing.
Even Vince Russo with a filter isn’t so bad. Meaning quality of the story all falls on management, since they have the final say on whatever ends up on screen.And frequently the mystery falls flat, like the 10-C aliens.
Discovery at the start tried way too hard to be shocking and unexpected, and we ended up with Voq/Tyler "surprise" and the Lorca twist... and of course, Michael as the Red Angel after the misdirection that it would be her mother. Then the cause of the galaxy-ravaging Burn? An innocent child. It's Vince Russo booking Star Trek... and the three of you who get that will understand.
That's one of my favourite episodes of TNG!Someone is trapped in a harsh world with an enemy or bad-tempered alien, and the only way to make contact with the big ship to call for a rescue is to climb a mountain together and use a communication device at the top.
Musicals.
DSC is set in the Far Future. A non-prequel show gotta be set just after PIC.
That's funny, it was one of my favorite episodes of DS9!That's one of my favourite episodes of TNG!
Time travel stories that are over in a few days. Nothing consequence happens to the characters that time travel, and the future they return to never changes in a major way. Basically, it’s never a prolonged stay, and its never a messy experience.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.