That's not a prequel, it's a period piece, and a fictional account of an historical event.
Maybe, but I would argue that success of both hinges on what we can and do see, not what we can't (due to conflicts with known information.
That's not a prequel, it's a period piece, and a fictional account of an historical event.
If the super-nova were in Romulan space (which I assume it was) , wouldn't the star bear a more Romulan/Vulcan sounding name than "Hobus?"Hobus
Why? Likely as not, it was a Federation designation, or a universal translator translation.If the super-nova were in Romulan space (which I assume it was) , wouldn't the star bear a more Romulan/Vulcan sounding name than "Hobus?"
"Vobus"? "Robus"?If the super-nova were in Romulan space (which I assume it was) , wouldn't the star bear a more Romulan/Vulcan sounding name than "Hobus?"
What was wrong with the Dominion and when did they make an appearance in ENT?
Barely changing at all?If it was set 50 years after TNG then at least the tech would look appropriate for the time period.
There aren't many ideas circulating in Hollywood or the backwoods of writers through with Gene's vision of scale-sci fi now is all dystopia and basically doom and gloom untalented female leads and dictatorship and tyranny and durr durr evil. By the time Trek reaches the natural end of its life-sci fi will be dead as a genre.
I'm in favor of some sort of Federation break-up, as alway it would depend on how well it's plotted out and written.causes the Federation to break up and then disintegrate. It might even mirror our future
Don't want a dystopia, but also don't want a complete and utter utopia either.now is all dystopia and basically doom and gloom untalented female leads and dictatorship and tyranny and durr durr evil
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.