• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

"What it requires of it's God, Doctor..."

Status
Not open for further replies.
I try not to step on anyone's toes, but I believe religion is baloney, and has been nothing but trouble for the human race.
 
I worship a guy called Ben. He's smart, funny and incredibly attractive, but he's also a bit of a twat with an annoying tendency towards self-aggrandisement.
 
Oh, Chrisisall...

These do not tend to be fun threads

How do you define "fun"?
:lol:

I guess it's easier for me to say what's not fun, and for me, what's not fun is people - and it happens with allllllllllll sides of this issue, trust me here - not only insulting the beliefs of others, but doing so with smug self-satisfaction and even enjoyment.

It's particularly galling for me because I have seen people do this very thing, and they say, and maybe some even believe, that they aren't being insulting at all. "I didn't say you were an idiot - I was speaking generally," will be the sentiment expressed, or at least that is a sentiment that has been expressed regularly in previous threads of this kind.

But so far, not too bad - a couple of slips here and there, but thus far I haven't rolled my eyes even once. :lol:
 
Last edited:
What "it" requires first - and not necessarily from its God or doctor - is a book of grammar with special emphasis on the proper use of the apostrophe.
 
I too worship at the altar of proper grammar and punctuation, LeBarre. But hey, these things happen to us all - some more than others, admittedly, but it's happened to me enough that I dare not throw stones.
 
^Considering the OP's theme, JustKate, I would have thought that the throwing of stones fits in quite nicely.

If one doesn't seek to correct (where necessary), no one learns (including the teacher - who may be totally up herself).
 
Interesting thread. I'm a Christian, too. I grew up in a more fundamentalist kind of church, but have learned - through painful experiences - to reject it. I guess some would call me more liberal, then, although I believe that Jesus rejects fundamentalism, too.
 
^He does if the Fundies add to the Scriptures. Read his constant clashing with the Pharisees....

I'm a Christian, Evangelical-Free. I'm very conservative (In case you coudn't tell already :lol:), politically and theologically, but I'm certainly no "KJV ONLY!" or "NO DANCING OR CONTEMPORARY MUSIC" legalist type....

Why do I believe in God? It's as simple as this:

Everything that begins to exist has a cause.

The Universe began to exist.

Therefore...the Universe has a cause.

It's common sense, IMHO. If there's a design...there's a designer. If there's a moral law...there's a lawgiver. If there's a miracle...there's a God.
 
^He does if the Fundies add to the Scriptures. Read his constant clashing with the Pharisees....

I'm a Christian, Evangelical-Free. I'm very conservative (In case you coudn't tell already :lol:), politically and theologically, but I'm certainly no "KJV ONLY!" or "NO DANCING OR CONTEMPORARY MUSIC" legalist type....

Why do I believe in God? It's as simple as this:

Everything that begins to exist has a cause.

The Universe began to exist.

Therefore...the Universe has a cause.

It's common sense, IMHO. If there's a design...there's a designer. If there's a moral law...there's a lawgiver. If there's a miracle...there's a God.
COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT, a.k.a. FIRST CAUSE ARGUMENT (I)
(1) If I say something must have a cause, it has a cause.
(2) I say the universe must have a cause.
(3) Therefore, the universe has a cause.
(4) Therefore, God exists.
 
^:lol: C'mon.

My first point is common sense. Would you expect anything--an airplane, for example, to just "happen" to spring up literally out of nowhere? That's magic, not science. No...the airplane had to have been caused by something--creators.

My second point is the conclusion of modern science. The Big Bang Theory asserts that the Universe began through an great expansion, caused by matter and antimatter annihilation. But common sense demands that something like an explosion had to have been caused by something. Otherwise, why did the explosion happen then, and not earlier or later. In fact, why did it happen at all?

And...what was there before the Bang--which did not expand until that particular moment?
 
My second point is the conclusion of modern science. The Big Bang Theory asserts that the Universe began through an great expansion, caused by matter and antimatter annihilation. But common sense demands that something like an explosion had to have been caused by something. Otherwise, why did the explosion happen then, and not earlier or later. In fact, why did it happen at all?

And...what was there before the Bang--which did not expand until that particular moment?
Hee hee

ARGUMENT FROM INFINITE REGRESS, a.k.a. FIRST CAUSE ARGUMENT (II)
(1) Ask atheists what caused the Big Bang.
(2) Regardless of their answer, ask how they know this.
(3) Continue process until the atheist admits he doesn't know the answer to one of your questions.
(4) You win!
(5) Therefore, God exists.
 
Parents and grandparents on my dad's side are chrsitians, myself, brother and sister got taken to church way into our teens but I'm not a christian myself, nor is my brother and sister, although I do believe in God, Jesus and creation and like to combine the theory of evolution, which I don't fully subscribe to, with creation, believing that it may have been God himself who used the Big Bang to create the Universe and that the six days of creation were in fact thousands of years of evolution, like myabe a thousand for each day. Also like to go on the belief that since Adam and Eve there are only less than 10,000 years of recorded history, not millions.

This is my personal belief and as a result I know I'll probably go to hell if I die unexpectedley.

Do you think you're "not Christian" because you believe God used the processes we document as evolution and the Big Bang to create the universe? Who told you that? :(
 
Shazam...if you won't respond rationally, and instead continue to engage in emotional attacks, why should I even bother?

Honestly...you know as well as I do that your "exaggerations" are NOTHING like what I was saying....
 
Parents and grandparents on my dad's side are chrsitians, myself, brother and sister got taken to church way into our teens but I'm not a christian myself, nor is my brother and sister, although I do believe in God, Jesus and creation and like to combine the theory of evolution, which I don't fully subscribe to, with creation, believing that it may have been God himself who used the Big Bang to create the Universe and that the six days of creation were in fact thousands of years of evolution, like myabe a thousand for each day. Also like to go on the belief that since Adam and Eve there are only less than 10,000 years of recorded history, not millions.

This is my personal belief and as a result I know I'll probably go to hell if I die unexpectedley.

Do you think you're "not Christian" because you believe God used the processes we document as evolution and the Big Bang to create the universe? Who told you that? :(

To be fair, there are people who will tell him that, Nerys. Not me and not you, but they are out there. But in case you were wondering, Crewman, lots of us see no conflict between believing in God and also accepting evolution as a scientific fact.
 
Oh, I've had people try to tell me that, myself. The intolerance with which they did it darned near ran me out of the church when I was younger. But then I realized that attitude was their problem, not mine...and certainly not a reason for me to abandon my beliefs.
 
Re: "What it requires of its God, Doctor..."

But for the record, I'm a Christian

I'm a Muslim myself.
And I'm Buddhist. What a spread here!:techman:

What "it" requires first - and not necessarily from its God or doctor - is a book of grammar with special emphasis on the proper use of the apostrophe.
:guffaw:Yes, thanks. Really, I learned something. Its true.;)

lots of us see no conflict between believing in God and also accepting evolution as a scientific fact.
I have no problem with that. But it might be easier for me to say that; my belief states that my beliefs might be wrong.:shifty:
 
Sigh, and we were doing so well at the "civil" and "respect" bit.
Well of course you were. Mine was the first reply to state that God that does not exist.

Also, it's literally impossible for me to respect belief in higher power, God, creationism etc. It works the other way because to religious people, belief is kinda rational and likewise not believing is kinda rational, but to me - an atheist - believing is so unbelievably irrational that to respect it is to basically betray my own position.

You can respect people, even if you find their beliefs irrational. Just the same as respecting customs of other nationalities (or planets, in as in the Trek universe) when traveling or posting online.
 
Re: "What it requires of its God, Doctor..."

Chrisisall...the funny thing about believing in an absolute truth and the fallibility of humanity, as I do, means the knowledge that you may not be hitting it 100%. I do believe strongly in Christ. And I also know I don't have it all together yet, and never quite will in this life. This is why I think that Christians are called to believe passionately, yes, but to act with humility and acknowledge our mistakes quickly when we err.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top