• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

What is YOUR flying car?

Oh my, no. I only want one instance: this one. That way, before brain death, that data could be immediately backed up for restoration. I want me around, not just my likeness.
It would be you, but also you who split off from the original you. Also when you get down to it, we can't fully know that whatever it is that we consider to be "us" survives when you go to sleep. You could die when you sleep, then a perfect copy with your memories wakes up in the morning.

Sweet dreams.
 
Oh my, no. I only want one instance: this one. That way, before brain death, that data could be immediately backed up for restoration. I want me around, not just my likeness.
It would be you, but also you who split off from the original you. Also when you get down to it, we can't fully know that whatever it is that we consider to be "us" survives when you go to sleep. You could die when you sleep, then a perfect copy with your memories wakes up in the morning.

Sweet dreams.

Feh. I know I'm me when I go to sleep and wake up. The sacred party goat tells me when it whispers my lullabies.
 
Oh my, no. I only want one instance: this one. That way, before brain death, that data could be immediately backed up for restoration. I want me around, not just my likeness.
It would be you, but also you who split off from the original you. Also when you get down to it, we can't fully know that whatever it is that we consider to be "us" survives when you go to sleep. You could die when you sleep, then a perfect copy with your memories wakes up in the morning.

Sweet dreams.

 
Oh my, no. I only want one instance: this one. That way, before brain death, that data could be immediately backed up for restoration. I want me around, not just my likeness.
It would be you, but also you who split off from the original you. Also when you get down to it, we can't fully know that whatever it is that we consider to be "us" survives when you go to sleep. You could die when you sleep, then a perfect copy with your memories wakes up in the morning.

Sweet dreams.


Don't bring reality and facts into this.
 
That's crazy, tsq. You don't wear black boots with black spots.
 
I was actually speaking more philosophically. What's the difference between a continuous existence and one that only thinks it has a continuous existence to the mind?
 
I was actually speaking more philosophically. What's the difference between a continuous existence and one that only thinks it has a continuous existence to the mind?

I know. I was just teasing. That GIF is just such a happy opposite of reality and facts. :)

I agree it's a good question, it just does't apply sleep. While wakefulness certainly isn't continuous, there are plenty of other functions of the brain that are. And even without all the fancy equipment to look at a sleeping brain, I think dreams offer pretty good evidence of continuity as they're usually in some way (however bizarrely, peripherally, or tangentially) related to recent waking thoughts and experiences, and we retain some memory of them.
 
I was actually speaking more philosophically. What's the difference between a continuous existence and one that only thinks it has a continuous existence to the mind?

I know. I was just teasing. That GIF is just such a happy opposite of reality and facts. :)

I agree it's a good question, it just does't apply sleep. While wakefulness certainly isn't continuous, there are plenty of other functions of the brain that are. And even without all the fancy equipment to look at a sleeping brain, I think dreams offer pretty good evidence of continuity as they're usually in some way (however bizarrely, peripherally, or tangentially) related to recent waking thoughts and experiences, and we retain some memory of them.
It still isn't 100%, there are periods where you lose consciousness and don't even dream.


I also want A.I., which would probably exist by the time we figured out how to perfectly simulate a person's brain. Something on the level of Samantha in Her would be great.
 
^Yes!
It still isn't 100%, there are periods where you lose consciousness and don't even dream.
Well, yeah, but like I said before, there is plenty else that your brain is doing that is continual throughout any stage of consciousness, including sleep, so the continuity problem just doesn't apply. You're functioning at varying levels of consciousness throughout waking and sleeping, but functional continuity is broken all the time...even when awake you can be in states where you're only minimally conscious of your surroundings, like daydreaming, or selectively conscious, for example due to inattention blindness. The continuity problem doesn't apply to those situations, so why should it apply to sleep? If you're basing continuity solely on stream of consciousness (which doesn't make sense, given how the brain works), then maybe I could see an argument for anesthesia-induced unconsciousness...I mean, that at least feels like your brain has been completely off, with you counting down in the operating room one instant and waking up in recovery the next, with not even a sense of time passing. But with sleep? No way. Functional continuity is irrelevant to the continuity problem, because the continuity problem is about the continuity of the mind, not just one aspect of it.
 
My personal Flying Car is space travel and colonization. When I was sitting there watching Neil Armstrong plant that flag, I never would have believed we'd have accomplished so little in the next half century.

Also, Asimov-style Robot friends.

My "flying car" is world peace. In the mid to late 80s (this would be from when I was 10 - 14 or so), I was convinced that by the year 2000, we would have a peaceful planet
I've been waiting for that since the 60s. Make love, not war. Yeah, right.

I'm waiting for someone to be able to digitally insert a younger Sean Connery as Bond, overwriting George Lazenby in On Her Majesty's Secret Service.
I want to see new movies with Humphrey Bogart. :mallory:

I was actually speaking more philosophically. What's the difference between a continuous existence and one that only thinks it has a continuous existence to the mind?
The difference is that I don't want to take any chances. :rommie: The solution to the continuity issue is simply maintaining continuity-- i.e., gradual upgrades.
 
I was actually speaking more philosophically. What's the difference between a continuous existence and one that only thinks it has a continuous existence to the mind?
The difference is that I don't want to take any chances. :rommie: The solution to the continuity issue is simply maintaining continuity-- i.e., gradual upgrades.

That's what you'd have to do. I read a book where people used a warp network that could backup your body and memories. Since it was the most common form of travel, if something happened you just pop out at your most recent destination. It does mention that it is confusing if you forget to backup yourself.

You could possibly have multiple running versions of yourself at the same time. I'd finally have a fair fight in Halo.

I see one flaw in your logic, if you could have multiple versions of yourself could the same not also be true of your opponents?
I prefer it old school and play against people in the room. Having a Lan Me Party seems like a decent time.
 
I would prefer to have the Hoverboards than the flying cars to be honest, although I suppose they probably utilise the same technology so if you have one you can have the other.
This!! Hoverboards serve not much use but would be beyond incredibly fun.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top