^ But none of that (the quotes) were clearly explained or used in the finished OT films, particularly the ideas about all that happens when one dies.
But none of it is inconsistent with the OT. The OT establishes nothing which contradicts any of it, and certainly does not establish Christian eschatology anywhere.
And the point was that Lucas' ideas about 'all that happens when one dies' had predated the prequels by twenty years and had nothing to do with the EU. So blather about 'the convoluted Force meanings from the prequels and the now thankfully erased EU' is irrelevant here.
(and there was no such thing as a Force ghost during ANH's production).
"Both Alec Guinness and I came up with the thing of having Ben go on afterward as part of The Force." - Lucas, quoted in Rolling Stone, 1977
Lucas changed his ideas on the Force so much
Nope. He changed his ideas on how many movies there would be. Some seem to see this as a bludgeon to be wielded against other subjects.
that he ended up creating contradictions in the series about its basic nature--the worst example being his revisionist PT midichlorians
Midichlorians contradict precisely nothing from the OT. The revisionism is on your part, as you seem to ignore the fact that ROTJ established high-level Force potential being passed down genetically in a certain bloodline. Midichlorians are merely the details underscoring this phenomenon.
But in addition you make another even more fundamental misrepresentation, as you conflate the nature of the Force itself with the nature of Force sensitivity, in order to fabricate make-believe 'contradiction':
and rating Force ability of users, which was not a part of any definition of the Force in the OT.
Maybe because a 'definition of the Force', as its name suggests, would stick to
defining the Force, as opposed to exploring the Force ability of users?
As you seem unfamiliar with the content of the films:
The Force is defined in ANH (and TESB). The mechanism of differential Force sensitivity, however, is not defined.
In TPM the mechanism of Force sensitivity is defined, but the film neglects to actually define the Force.
Learning about midichlorians in TPM does not define the Force. Midichlorians are not the Force. The definition of the Force as presented in ANH (or TESB) remains intact. Nothing about it is overwritten or removed. TPM can't be contradicting the definition of the Force when it is talking about a different subject.
And this is all before we even get to the fact that variance in innate Force ability is a thing in the OT. It is inescapably baked into the narrative. What do you think it means when it is said that the Force is strong with someone?
You refer to Han using Hell as colloquial speech, but such speech is derived from established ideas, concepts or places, thus Han's use of Hell obviously is based on his thinking Hell is a location.
Bullshit. I use that word, and I don't think it's a location. And again, Han thinking something would not necessarily make it true. At one point he believed the Force did not exist ( in a way that made him look irreligious if anything ).