So Cochrane is the physicist, engineer, test pilot, inventor, mathematician, everything?
He worked the equations governing subspace, discovered the "space warp", designed a warp engine to enable FTL travel, and then did the piloting, too?
He did the whole damn thing? Or what?
Yeah, this struck me as silly in
First Contact as well.
The truth is, the more
Star Trek has filled in its backstory on screen the less plausible that "future history" has become.
Events which every viewer could imagine having occurred in the way that seems most believable to each of them - based on a particular viewer's knowledge and biases about history, science, human nature, etc - wind up being dramatized in very specific ways. There's a lot less room for imagination and interpretation.
The limitations and requirements of dramatizing a story in two hours in a movie, or in an hour or so of television, militate particularly against any truly plausible portrayal of technological and scientific developments.
At what moment did the Internet as we know it come into existence? What single individual invented it (no Al Gore jokes)? What about the electrification of America? The "invention" of the supersonic jet fighter?
Remarkably, every time we see the invention or discovery of any important piece of future tech in
Star Trek - warp drive, the transporter, their computer systems - it turns out to be the nearly sole effort of one man, working in effective isolation with an assistant or two. That's primarily because a teleplay or movie is going to be about a few central, dramatic characters, not because anyone has carefully thought out how such advances are developed from seminal discoveries to working systems in the real world.