V
Vale
Guest
I'd agree that Beyond was the best Abramsverse movie. Both 2009 and Into Darkness are varying degrees of unholy mess.
Don't care for any of them. The Xindi reference in Beyond alone is enough to put it near the bottom.I'd agree that Beyond was the best Abramsverse movie. Both 2009 and Into Darkness are varying degrees of unholy mess.
Don't care for any of them. The Xindi reference in Beyond alone is enough to put it near the bottom.
That was the problem for me in the 1st 2 movies involving Urban who felt like a walking talking highlight reel of Deforest Kelley's best mannerisms from TOS, something I thought was pushing parody. Urban, I thought, excelled when he didn't ape off of De Kelley and found dimensions in his character in BEYOND, unfortunately the worst movie from that trilogy. As for Quinto, and Pine, I thought they were very different versions of the Kirk and Spock I loved; where I wasn't much of a fan of Pine's character but I have a special place of love for Quinto's Spock, a character who wrestled with his emotions throughout the 2 JJ Abrams movies. Still felt the next chapter should've explored the obstacles on New Vulcan, for me, a missed opportunity.In what way did Rian Johnson Star Wars include a Star Trek elements?
I enjoyed ST '09 when it first came out, but the sequels were putrid and highlighted some of the flaws from '09. They should have cast method actors for both Kirk and Spock (but especially Kirk). Karl Urban was dead on as McCoy.
Don't care for any of them. The Xindi reference in Beyond alone is enough to put it near the bottom.
I found the Xindi story arc to be a weak and campy story arc.What's wrong with the Xindi?
"The Xindi", Season 2's finale, sold it as they wanted ENT Season 3 to be this Serious Post-9/11 Hard-Hitting Sci-Fi Series... and then it wasn't. Except when it was and they had Archer practicing Dick Cheney style torture tactics to prove he "has what it takes". It rubbed me the wrong way. And the Xindi looked like the creators saw Farscape and decided "We want aliens who look like those!" but they didn't quite pull it off.I found the Xindi story arc to be a weak and campy story arc.
I found the Xindi story arc to be a weak and campy story arc.
I can't agree with you about season 2 being worse than season 3. No doubt season 2 was often weak and directionless, but it did have some redeeming Andorian episodes, and it was no where's near as disjointed and chaotic as season 3."The Xindi", Season 2's finale, sold it as they wanted ENT Season 3 to be this Serious Post-9/11 Hard-Hitting Sci-Fi Series... and then it wasn't. Except when it was and they had Archer practicing Dick Cheney style torture tactics to prove he "has what it takes". It rubbed me the wrong way. And the Xindi looked like the creators saw Farscape and decided "We want aliens who look like those!" but they didn't quite pull it off.
Sure, ENT Season 3 was better than ENT Season 2, there's no denying that... but everything was better than ENT S2, so that's not saying a lot.
This is the answer you seek:And? Just referencing the Xindi vaguely in Beyond as a former enemy doesn't really do anything negative to the plot. Just like in TOS when they referenced a made-up dictator or medical disease didn't harm the story. Except, this time, the uberfans might have some context in their world building.
As much as I like Andorians Enterprise did them no favors.
Yes, and I didn't like it.What!? Like 90% of Andorian appearances and lore is from Enterprise![]()
And, it was well done... It made Andorians relevant.What!? Like 90% of Andorian appearances and lore is from Enterprise![]()
Fourth would be FC.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.