• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

What are your opinions regarding Star Trek that are, shall we say, unorthodox?

...she is just as uninspiring in person as she is with her acting. Zero charisma. And zero chemistry with any of the other actors. Horrible casting.
I'm so glad to hear this from someone who got close enough. I always thoought she was way behind the rest of the cast on acting ability. All the more credit to her fellow cast members, I guess.
 
Yeah, as much as I enjoy the concept of the character, the execution was less than stellar.

As for Picard/Crusher.... I like to think that thanks to Jack, they became deeply close friends. When he died, it left a wound for both. Even thought Jeun-Luc may have been in love at one point, after that, it feels like them wanting to connect more deeply because of their shared wound in missing Jack. When they finally did try, a few times according to Picard S3, it just never worked because there was never any real romantic love, just a deep platonic love. Which people can often misread for romantic love. Hence why so many men find it difficult to say I love you to friends or family, sometimes even children. They confuse love with romance. I tell my male friends, and some female friends, and my family and my little one that I love them all the time.
 
SHARE YOUR PAIN, AND GAIN STRENGTH FROM IT.
Here's an unorthodox opinion. The Final Frontier, at least half of it, was a good movie. The sharing of pain scene is a very trekkien troupe.

In terms of ranking the title sequences

Prodigy
Voyager
Enterprise (maybe another unorthodox opinion)
Lower Decks
DS9
Strange New Worlds
Picard
Star Trek
Discovery
TNG
Starfleet Academy

I would love for Jeff Russo to do a deconstruction of both Discovery and Starfleet Academy's sequences. Im curious to know the inspiration.
 
Last edited:
Conceptually, it was originally supposed to be more like the 18th or 19th century British navy in space. You know, Horatio Hornblower and all that.
Well, the resemblance to Hornblower specifically was oversold, no matter how often GR or Meyer made it. In the latter case, he admitted to lifting a plot element from the Peck movie; that and imitating the style of some similar sea movies are about it.

There is the general resemblance of evoking the ranging independence of the Age of Sail, and it works for Trek. But the milieu of the ship and service are modern American.
 
Last edited:
Sorry, I’m slowly going thru all the posts. But you are 100% correct.

Tbh, I had lunch with Gates and some Paramont folks back in the day (my company bought a lot of TV ads on Star Trek so they sent me up anytime we had to have a meeting as they knew I was a big fan) and she is just as uninspiring in person as she is with her acting. Zero charisma. And zero chemistry with any of the other actors. Horrible casting.

She was probably high.

1778764531433.png
 
Sorry, I’m slowly going thru all the posts. But you are 100% correct.

Tbh, I had lunch with Gates and some Paramont folks back in the day (my company bought a lot of TV ads on Star Trek so they sent me up anytime we had to have a meeting as they knew I was a big fan) and she is just as uninspiring in person as she is with her acting. Zero charisma. And zero chemistry with any of the other actors. Horrible casting.

McFadden could smash it out of the park when they gave her decent material to work with, which was almost never.
 
I like Pulaski, but am glad she was only around for one season. I think another five seasons and she would’ve been grating pretty quickly.
 
I like Pulaski, but am glad she was only around for one season. I think another five seasons and she would’ve been grating pretty quickly.
I liked her too, even though she was basically a McCoy clone, more or less. There was good character evolution with her over that one season, especially between her and Data. I wouldn't have minded if she came back for a guest shot or two over the seasons or in the movies, but apparently she didn't get along with the rest of the cast much and the feeling was mutual.
 
I liked her too, even though she was basically a McCoy clone, more or less. There was good character evolution with her over that one season, especially between her and Data. I wouldn't have minded if she came back for a guest shot or two over the seasons or in the movies, but apparently she didn't get along with the rest of the cast much and the feeling was mutual.

Always hard to be the new kid.
 
Conceptually, it was originally supposed to be more like the 18th or 19th century British navy in space. You know, Horatio Hornblower and all that.
They always said that, but only the occasional story (like “Balance of Terror” or The Wrath of Khan) felt like it.

Likewise (more so) with the other supposed model of “Wagon Train to the Stars” — whatever Roddenberry said to get the show sold, Trek’s never been that. (Galactica was, both versions.)
 
Likewise (more so) with the other supposed model of “Wagon Train to the Stars” — whatever Roddenberry said to get the show sold, Trek’s never been that. (Galactica was, both versions.)
That wasn't about the literal format of the show but it was TV shorthand for quality writing and of having guest stars whom the stories would revolve around. On Wagon Train you'd meet different people in the train or at a stop for an episode, much the way the Enterprise crew would meet people from different planets and ships, etc.
 
Last edited:
I like Pulaski, but am glad she was only around for one season. I think another five seasons and she would’ve been grating pretty quickly.

The problem with Pulaski (besides being the aforementioned McCoy clone) was that it was completely unbelievable that a 24th century Starfleet doctor would have some kind of problem with thinking that Data was not an actual life form, despite the fact that he’s a Starfleet officer. It made Pulaski look like a bitch right out of the starting gate, and no amount of getting to know Data better was going to fix that, because she was never depicted as being believably repentant for her behavior.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top