• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

What are your controversial Star Trek opinions?

This is bizarre to me. John Colicos and Michael Ansara were both great actors, but they just weren't in the same league as Plummer.
Agreed. Watching Colicos in a similar type of leading antagonist role in Anne of the Thousand Days shows he's a great character actor playing the heavy, but he just doesn't hold the space on screen that someone like Plummer could.
 
Am I the only one who finds Worf to be kind of a boring Klingon? I just don't put him on the same level as many other Klingons we've seen over the years. Perhaps it is simply because we've seen him so much -- more, in fact, than any other Trek character -- that he has become a bit worn out. I don't actively dislike the character or anything. And Michael Dorn does a fine job playing the part. I just don't find the character that interesting.
 
Am I the only one who finds Worf to be kind of a boring Klingon? I just don't put him on the same level as many other Klingons we've seen over the years. Perhaps it is simply because we've seen him so much -- more, in fact, than any other Trek character -- that he has become a bit worn out. I don't actively dislike the character or anything. And Michael Dorn does a fine job playing the part. I just don't find the character that interesting.
He's the Klingon other Klingons avoid at parties. :klingon:
 
i wouldn't say boring, but he's a lot more staid than other klingons, outside of a few early-season wirdnesses. probably because of both trying too hard to be a "real" klingon and being stuck between cultures
 
Am I the only one who finds Worf to be kind of a boring Klingon? I just don't put him on the same level as many other Klingons we've seen over the years. Perhaps it is simply because we've seen him so much -- more, in fact, than any other Trek character -- that he has become a bit worn out. I don't actively dislike the character or anything. And Michael Dorn does a fine job playing the part. I just don't find the character that interesting.
I have never really liked Worf
 
Kor is the only Klingon to be a downright awful villain in one episode or film and then a noble hero with a lot of redeeming qualities in his next appearances.

I enjoyed Colicos as the Falstaffian Kor of DS9, but it's always felt to me that "Blood Oath" would've made more sense if it had inverted the personalities it gave to Kor and Koloth. The Koloth of "Tribbles" was like a mannered, effete upper-class English gentleman soldier, while the Koloth of "Blood Oath" was like a solemn, stoic samurai master. I couldn't see any throughline from one to the other. Sometimes I wonder if "Blood Oath"'s writers got Kor and Koloth mixed up.


Am I the only one who finds Worf to be kind of a boring Klingon? I just don't put him on the same level as many other Klingons we've seen over the years. Perhaps it is simply because we've seen him so much -- more, in fact, than any other Trek character -- that he has become a bit worn out. I don't actively dislike the character or anything. And Michael Dorn does a fine job playing the part. I just don't find the character that interesting.

The writers of TNG were too quick to stereotype Worf as the Klingon Warrior and not let him be much else, as little sense as it made for someone raised by the Rozhenkos on Gault and Earth to act so one-dimensionally Klingon. It wasn't until DS9 that he really got to blossom into a more multidimensional character.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top