What are your controversial Star Trek opinions?

While well written that doesn't explain the ATV driving scene. It's a poor explanation that this supposedly principled man was so disillusioned that he kills a pre-warp civilization and violate General Order One/The Prime Directive.

I appreciate that Picard never gave up but let's not pretend that he deserved some great accolade. The point of the evolved humanity was to give to the society and better oneself and humanity. If Picard was dissatisfied then walking away would be appropriate as he had already given his all.

 

Sometimes, so do I.

I'm glad someone got the joke.

 

Paramount had $150 million to spend on a movie. Almost anyone in the industry could have done a fine directorial job.

 

I... umm... what the... uhhh...

(scratches head)

This AI generated stuff just gets weirder and weirder. I feel like this was a weird mash up of TOS, a Gerry Anderson series like U.F.O. or SPACE: 1999, and 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY mixed with music from an old NES game.

I feel like my brain was just removed from my skull, thrown into a washer, then rinsed, put back into my head, and then someone just shakes me senselessly until I actually blink again.

I don't know if I have the words.

 

Oh I agree there is no excuse for the awful writing of NEM and Picard's wierd out-of-character behaviour in the movies. At least in FC it makes some sort of sense for his character as we have seen Die Hard Picard before but in INS just because this pre-warp alien race lives on a planet with regenerative powers doesn't make them exempt from the Prime Directive and if the same events were taking place in the days of TNG he would have broken the bad news himself and then let the rest of Starfleet deal with it. I feel like they wanted to make Picard more of a rebellious character in the Movies to draw a wider audience and satisfy more movie goers but it's totally out of character for Picard and this direction ended doing more damage to the franchise than good. Kirk was the captain that bent the rules for the best interests of all parties involved. Picard used wisdom and emotional intelligence to find alternative solutions to problems. Two very different captains.

 

I liked TOS at 13 because I could kind of believe lies about adulthood as something I hadn't experienced. Picard annoyed and bored me because lies about getting old contradict my experience.

 

Am I alone in just chalking up Picard's behaviour in some of the Next Generation films to a midlife crisis?

 

Nope. You're not the only one.

His family dying, the Enterprise-D being destroyed, and meeting Kirk all sparked something. Coping with loss and taking advice from a historical figure did something weird to him. Fighting the Borg again only encouraged it.

Data's death finally snapped him out of it... and snapped him into something else.

So, basically, Picard had one thing or another going on with him from 2371 all the way up to 2399. I think there's some double-meaning when Picard says, "I haven't been living, I've been waiting to die." He spent part of that time reckless, as if he had a death-wish (the mid-life crisis), and then spent the rest of it moping. "The dreams are lovely. It's the waking up I'm beginning to regret."

 

Makes sense. Think of all the failed romances and personal endeavors Picard attempted during his seven years on the Enterprise-D. As stated above his brother and nephew dying violent deaths. Melancholy over past losses in his life. Action Hero Picard is a version of the thing that happens to many men when they feel like their goals in life are unobtained and out of reach. Change who you appear to be on the outside to make up for the person you're not within.

So for a few years Picard becomes Rambo Jean-Luc who likes to wear tank tops.

 

Hence why the scholastic renaissance man suddenly got really, really into driving dune buggies.

 

Yes I love all these points, Mid-Life crisis Picard dealing with loss and disillusioned with Starfleet explains SOME of what happened in the TNG movies. The rest is obviously poor writing and NEM suffered from a director with no knowledge or passion for the source material. I think Picard is somewhat redeemed though in Picard Season 3. He got the son he didn't know about but wanted all the same, and I think Terry was trying his best to bring him back towards the man he was in his prime, on the E-D, and I think overall it was successful. Whether you like the fan service or find it a bit cringe, there's no denying that by the final couple of episodes Picard has made peace with himself and finally seen the value again in the support and admiration of his peers and the lower decks alike. And they couldn't end his story without saving the world one more time, so they had to throw in the Borg curveball for good measure. The character of Picard finally got the happy ending he deserved.

 

That Picard worked for his happy ending is admirable but hardly deserved.

 

Why is it not deserved? I would argue he worked very hard on himself over the 3 seasons of PIC.

 

I thought Picard got his vibe back over the course of the first season, he was the Academy commandant and pretty on top of things in Season 2.

 

This may be a controversial opinion in general (not just Trek) but I do not operate with the attitude that characters deserve any particular outcome. To me, and this comes from studying mythology, older stories, and some personal preferences, but characters go on a journey and if the outcome is a happy one then great. If the outcome is less happy and the story is well done also great.

So I struggle with "deserve" in a character context. They don't deserve anything except a satisfactory ending to the story, happy or sad.

 

OK. I see that I took "deserve" in a different context.

 

Actually, the rest is 95% actor ego demanding these action hero aspects and 5% the writing having to bend over backwards to accommodate it.

 

In Nemesis he meets himself at 30.

In Insurrection a magic planet made him feel like he was 30, and if he had stayed there a little longer, he would have been 30 inside and out.

A midlife crisis is generally figurative, but what we got here is a literal juxtapisition with his youth, that is either trying to murder Picard or consume Picard.

 

It works pretty well with the Picard we saw in Tapestry too - you know perfectly the Picard who gets into a scrap with Nausicans is the same kind of nut jub who would go joy riding.

Tapestry actually was about season 5 so just as Picard was becoming more action/"fun"/less reserved so I think the Picard who wouldn't act like he did in Nem is more season 1 and 2 Picard - a Picard who was still broken due to the events on the Stargazer and so adopted this uber reserved and uptight persona to protect himself.

By Season 5 he has been assimilated, had Q fuck with him multiple times, started hanging around with Guinan again which can only have been good for getting that stick out of his arse, had become a key part of the Klingon political environment (and took a stabbing for it too) so he has likely come to recognise that whilst going in all guns blazing isn't the answer to his problems, he also can't solve everything with a patronising speech.

Come Nem and his First Officer of 20ish years is leaving him, Worf left years ago, Wesley showed up to the wedding and wouldn't shut up when instructed too - I can see how he got a bit of the old "one last hurrah" into his mind about going to the planet and going for a ride.

 

The real-life behind-the-scenes reason for this is that, when it came time to make the TNG movies, Patrick Stewart had much more influence and story input than he did during the run of the TV series. What may have been a request to the writers on TNG became a demand in order to agree to doing another movie. And the whole thing might be an example of why it's not always a great idea to give an actor authority on story decisions for their character. For example, it was Brent Spiner's idea to kill Data in Nemesis, and not only did it not go over well but it took 3 seasons of Picard to dig their way out from that decision.

Reportedly, Stewart pushed for the movies to feature a version of Picard that was more an action hero, instead of the cerebral speech-maker from the TV series. He wanted Picard to be the one that was in the middle of fights, carrying a phaser, and the driver of the action within the stories. That's why Generations, First Contact, Insurrection, and Nemesis all feature "final fights" where Stewart is face-to-face with the villains, or Picard driving a Starfleet dune buggy in the desert, or Picard having the love story with the Baku woman.

In their review for Picard season 3, Mike and Rich over at Red Letter Media made the argument that Matalas not only tries to retcon some of the choices made in seasons 1 and 2, but also attempts to correct some of the decisions made during the movies as well.