What are your controversial Star Trek opinions?
- Thread starter Amasov
- Start date
This should be canon.
What about the Deneva Parasites being in a war with the Conspiracy bugs?
Another controversial view you seem to have: that Lower Decks is abbreviated LOW and...I'm guessing Short Treks (?) is abbreviated SHO.
SHO = Star Trek: The Next Generation. Obviously.
Last edited:
Ds9, TOs. DIsCO.
https://www.ex-astris-scientia.org/database/series-titles.htm
DS9 = Deep Space Nine
TOS = The Original Series
Dsc = Discovery
The Movies need a bit more information for clarity IMO:
DS9 = Deep Space Nine
TOS = The Original Series
Dsc = Discovery
The Movies need a bit more information for clarity IMO:
- ST01:TMP = "Star Trek: The Motion Picture"
- ST02:TWoK = "Star Trek: The Wrath of Kahn"
- ST11:2k9 = "Star Trek (2009)"
- ST12:ID = "Star Trek: Into Darkness"
- ST13:B = "Star Trek: Beyond"
That if we let the Kelvin-verse die without any more movies, Chris Pine can cross-deck and replace Wesley as James Kirk in SNW.
He'd eat up all the budget sadly. We'd get a whole season set in present day Canada.
Chris wants to be paid millions of dollars to do a couple weeks work.
Paul is willing to be paid, bless his cotton socks, just thousands of dollars to work for 8 months a year.
Chris might work for scale, for a special occasion, if he is feeling generous.
Yah. Don't care. We need a 'Kirk' in SNW who signals James T. Kirk. Wesley ain't that guy- sorry.
They can't afford Christopher Pine, period.
He's too expensive, so unless Christopher Pine is willing to take a serious pay cut, it ain't happening.
He's too expensive, so unless Christopher Pine is willing to take a serious pay cut, it ain't happening.
Vampire Diaries was huge.
Paul even as the way less sexier brother, can pull some of that audience, who buys key chains and novelty monopoly sets, over to this side of the fandom.
Paul even as the way less sexier brother, can pull some of that audience, who buys key chains and novelty monopoly sets, over to this side of the fandom.
Last edited:
I’ve never heard of Vampire Diaries.
They're kept in the Vampire Nightstand.
Although a first-rate series, I believe "Deep Space Nine" is overrated and had failed to reach its potential of being the best Trek show. I barely like Season Six and disliked most of Season Seven. Instead, I would rate it just as good or bad as "Next Generation" and "Voyager". I also believe "Strange New Worlds" is basically a rehash of both "The Original Series" and to a certain degree, "Next Generation", but with a different lead. This is something I do not like.
Similar threads
- Locked
