What's makes a STAR TREK show Trek?
Usually, I go by the actual title of the series.

What's makes a STAR TREK show Trek?
Usually, I go by the actual title of the series.
Discovery isn't Trek that's modernized; it's modern expectation for a generic sci-fi show with the label Trek slapped on it. It's sort of gone the full circle. Modern sci-fi has been influenced by years of Trek. And now a Trek show that is modern sci-fi.I'm not sure people would've been so quick to appreciate what Strange New Worlds is doing without Discovery coming first to show off what modernised serialised Trek looks like.
"Spock's Brain" was not a bad episode.
ENT is better (and canon, as opposed to) DIS, PIC, SHO, LOW, and SNW.
TAS is canon.
My controversial Star Trek opinions. That is the thread title, is it not?What are you talking about?
![]()
My controversial Star Trek opinions. That is the thread title, is it not?
My controversial Star Trek opinions. That is the thread title, is it not?
Sorry, I thought I must have stepped into the middle of a conversation without context. And I was saying I think (like some articles on Ex Astris Scientia say) that I opine that those shows are an alternate universe. Edited to rephrase appropriately.I’m well aware of the thread title, thanks.
I was literally trying to understand what you said, but yeah I get it now.
![]()
Well, a some people think it is and a ton of others think it isn't.I'm not sure TAS as canon is controversial?
I'll add my two cents on this. I think TOS is great, and it doesn't need to be treated as holy writ. Moreso, I don't think any Star Trek production should be treated as holy writ or immutable.the some type of holy grail or the gold standard by which all other Trek needs to measured - not so much.
What are you talking about?
![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.